Phylogenetic analysis of skull shape evolution in marmotine squirrels using landmarks and thin-plate splines

<strong>Abstract</strong> Several studies have shown that the recently developed techniques of geometric morphometrics are extremely powerful descriptive tools. And yet, one potential use of the resulting descriptions, phylogenetic analysis, has generally been neglected....

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Donald Swiderski, Miriam Zelditch, W. Fink
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Associazione Teriologica Italiana 2000-06-01
Series:Hystrix, the Italian Journal of Mammalogy
Online Access:http://www.italian-journal-of-mammalogy.it/article/view/4136
id doaj-6c916828d48b401a9b341e463a493daa
record_format Article
spelling doaj-6c916828d48b401a9b341e463a493daa2020-11-25T03:40:04ZengAssociazione Teriologica ItalianaHystrix, the Italian Journal of Mammalogy0394-19141825-52722000-06-0111110.4404/hystrix-11.1-4136Phylogenetic analysis of skull shape evolution in marmotine squirrels using landmarks and thin-plate splinesDonald SwiderskiMiriam ZelditchW. Fink<strong>Abstract</strong> Several studies have shown that the recently developed techniques of geometric morphometrics are extremely powerful descriptive tools. And yet, one potential use of the resulting descriptions, phylogenetic analysis, has generally been neglected. This neglect is understandable because prominent systematists as well as prominent morphometricians have objected to the use of morphometric data in phylogenetic systematics. We agree that some methods of morphometric analysis produce results that cannot be used in phylogenetic systematics, and that some methods of incorporating morphometric results into statements about character transformation are not appropriate. However, we do not agree that these objections to specific techniques support a blanket rejection of the use of morphometric data in systematic studies. In this paper, we review the principles of phylogenetic systematics and show that they are equally applicable to qualitative descriptions of triangles and to quantitative descriptions (shape coordinates of the apex) of those same shapes. Then we show how these principles would he applied to complex shapes like skulls of marmotine squirrels, and that the resulting analysis leads to legitimate hypotheses about marmotine phylogeny and the evolution of skull shape in these animals. http://www.italian-journal-of-mammalogy.it/article/view/4136
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Donald Swiderski
Miriam Zelditch
W. Fink
spellingShingle Donald Swiderski
Miriam Zelditch
W. Fink
Phylogenetic analysis of skull shape evolution in marmotine squirrels using landmarks and thin-plate splines
Hystrix, the Italian Journal of Mammalogy
author_facet Donald Swiderski
Miriam Zelditch
W. Fink
author_sort Donald Swiderski
title Phylogenetic analysis of skull shape evolution in marmotine squirrels using landmarks and thin-plate splines
title_short Phylogenetic analysis of skull shape evolution in marmotine squirrels using landmarks and thin-plate splines
title_full Phylogenetic analysis of skull shape evolution in marmotine squirrels using landmarks and thin-plate splines
title_fullStr Phylogenetic analysis of skull shape evolution in marmotine squirrels using landmarks and thin-plate splines
title_full_unstemmed Phylogenetic analysis of skull shape evolution in marmotine squirrels using landmarks and thin-plate splines
title_sort phylogenetic analysis of skull shape evolution in marmotine squirrels using landmarks and thin-plate splines
publisher Associazione Teriologica Italiana
series Hystrix, the Italian Journal of Mammalogy
issn 0394-1914
1825-5272
publishDate 2000-06-01
description <strong>Abstract</strong> Several studies have shown that the recently developed techniques of geometric morphometrics are extremely powerful descriptive tools. And yet, one potential use of the resulting descriptions, phylogenetic analysis, has generally been neglected. This neglect is understandable because prominent systematists as well as prominent morphometricians have objected to the use of morphometric data in phylogenetic systematics. We agree that some methods of morphometric analysis produce results that cannot be used in phylogenetic systematics, and that some methods of incorporating morphometric results into statements about character transformation are not appropriate. However, we do not agree that these objections to specific techniques support a blanket rejection of the use of morphometric data in systematic studies. In this paper, we review the principles of phylogenetic systematics and show that they are equally applicable to qualitative descriptions of triangles and to quantitative descriptions (shape coordinates of the apex) of those same shapes. Then we show how these principles would he applied to complex shapes like skulls of marmotine squirrels, and that the resulting analysis leads to legitimate hypotheses about marmotine phylogeny and the evolution of skull shape in these animals.
url http://www.italian-journal-of-mammalogy.it/article/view/4136
work_keys_str_mv AT donaldswiderski phylogeneticanalysisofskullshapeevolutioninmarmotinesquirrelsusinglandmarksandthinplatesplines
AT miriamzelditch phylogeneticanalysisofskullshapeevolutioninmarmotinesquirrelsusinglandmarksandthinplatesplines
AT wfink phylogeneticanalysisofskullshapeevolutioninmarmotinesquirrelsusinglandmarksandthinplatesplines
_version_ 1724536658943016960