Differences in Nanostructure and Hydrophobicity of Cicada (Cryptotympana atrata) Forewing Surface with the Distribution of Precipitation

Although the cicada wing has a variety of functions and the nanostructure and surface properties of many species have been extensively investigated, there are no reports investigating diversity of nanostructures and wetting properties within a single species collected at locations with different rai...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Mingxia Sun, Jiajing Zhang, Gregory S. Watson, Jolanta A. Watson, Dong Han, Aiping Liang
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Hindawi Limited 2018-01-01
Series:Applied Bionics and Biomechanics
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2018/5305847
id doaj-6c8e6ff82c7246c39ed66feb83dd0eda
record_format Article
spelling doaj-6c8e6ff82c7246c39ed66feb83dd0eda2021-07-02T06:41:47ZengHindawi LimitedApplied Bionics and Biomechanics1176-23221754-21032018-01-01201810.1155/2018/53058475305847Differences in Nanostructure and Hydrophobicity of Cicada (Cryptotympana atrata) Forewing Surface with the Distribution of PrecipitationMingxia Sun0Jiajing Zhang1Gregory S. Watson2Jolanta A. Watson3Dong Han4Aiping Liang5Key Laboratory of Systematic and Evolution, Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beichen West Road 1-5, Chaoyang District, Beijing 100101, ChinaZhongguancun Middle School, Kexueyuannan Road 14, Haidian District, Beijing 100080, ChinaFaculty of Science, Health, Education and Engineering, University of the Sunshine Coast, Fraser Coast Campus, Hervey Bay, QLD 4655, AustraliaFaculty of Science, Health, Education and Engineering, University of the Sunshine Coast, Fraser Coast Campus, Hervey Bay, QLD 4655, AustraliaNational Center for Nanoscience and Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, No. 11, Beiyitiao Zhongguancun, Haidian District, Beijing 100190, ChinaKey Laboratory of Systematic and Evolution, Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beichen West Road 1-5, Chaoyang District, Beijing 100101, ChinaAlthough the cicada wing has a variety of functions and the nanostructure and surface properties of many species have been extensively investigated, there are no reports investigating diversity of nanostructures and wetting properties within a single species collected at locations with different rainfall conditions. In this study, the hydrophobicity and nanostructure dimensions of the forewing surface of Cryptotympana atrata were measured, based on specimens collected from 12 distributions with varying precipitation averages in China and Japan. The relationships among hydrophobicity, nanostructures, and precipitation were analyzed, and the adaption of hydrophobic nanostructures under different wet environments is discussed. The precipitation of locations in the years the samples of C. atrata were collected only has an effect on the diameter and spacing of wing surface nanostructure, and the multiple years of precipitation may have an influence on the basic diameter and spacing, as well as the height of protrusions. The rougher the wing surface, the stronger the hydrophobicity which was observed from samples taken where the rainfall conditions of the collection years are high. To our knowledge, this is one special example providing evidence of hydrophobic nanostructures found on a biological surface of a single species which shows adaption for specific wet environments.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2018/5305847
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Mingxia Sun
Jiajing Zhang
Gregory S. Watson
Jolanta A. Watson
Dong Han
Aiping Liang
spellingShingle Mingxia Sun
Jiajing Zhang
Gregory S. Watson
Jolanta A. Watson
Dong Han
Aiping Liang
Differences in Nanostructure and Hydrophobicity of Cicada (Cryptotympana atrata) Forewing Surface with the Distribution of Precipitation
Applied Bionics and Biomechanics
author_facet Mingxia Sun
Jiajing Zhang
Gregory S. Watson
Jolanta A. Watson
Dong Han
Aiping Liang
author_sort Mingxia Sun
title Differences in Nanostructure and Hydrophobicity of Cicada (Cryptotympana atrata) Forewing Surface with the Distribution of Precipitation
title_short Differences in Nanostructure and Hydrophobicity of Cicada (Cryptotympana atrata) Forewing Surface with the Distribution of Precipitation
title_full Differences in Nanostructure and Hydrophobicity of Cicada (Cryptotympana atrata) Forewing Surface with the Distribution of Precipitation
title_fullStr Differences in Nanostructure and Hydrophobicity of Cicada (Cryptotympana atrata) Forewing Surface with the Distribution of Precipitation
title_full_unstemmed Differences in Nanostructure and Hydrophobicity of Cicada (Cryptotympana atrata) Forewing Surface with the Distribution of Precipitation
title_sort differences in nanostructure and hydrophobicity of cicada (cryptotympana atrata) forewing surface with the distribution of precipitation
publisher Hindawi Limited
series Applied Bionics and Biomechanics
issn 1176-2322
1754-2103
publishDate 2018-01-01
description Although the cicada wing has a variety of functions and the nanostructure and surface properties of many species have been extensively investigated, there are no reports investigating diversity of nanostructures and wetting properties within a single species collected at locations with different rainfall conditions. In this study, the hydrophobicity and nanostructure dimensions of the forewing surface of Cryptotympana atrata were measured, based on specimens collected from 12 distributions with varying precipitation averages in China and Japan. The relationships among hydrophobicity, nanostructures, and precipitation were analyzed, and the adaption of hydrophobic nanostructures under different wet environments is discussed. The precipitation of locations in the years the samples of C. atrata were collected only has an effect on the diameter and spacing of wing surface nanostructure, and the multiple years of precipitation may have an influence on the basic diameter and spacing, as well as the height of protrusions. The rougher the wing surface, the stronger the hydrophobicity which was observed from samples taken where the rainfall conditions of the collection years are high. To our knowledge, this is one special example providing evidence of hydrophobic nanostructures found on a biological surface of a single species which shows adaption for specific wet environments.
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2018/5305847
work_keys_str_mv AT mingxiasun differencesinnanostructureandhydrophobicityofcicadacryptotympanaatrataforewingsurfacewiththedistributionofprecipitation
AT jiajingzhang differencesinnanostructureandhydrophobicityofcicadacryptotympanaatrataforewingsurfacewiththedistributionofprecipitation
AT gregoryswatson differencesinnanostructureandhydrophobicityofcicadacryptotympanaatrataforewingsurfacewiththedistributionofprecipitation
AT jolantaawatson differencesinnanostructureandhydrophobicityofcicadacryptotympanaatrataforewingsurfacewiththedistributionofprecipitation
AT donghan differencesinnanostructureandhydrophobicityofcicadacryptotympanaatrataforewingsurfacewiththedistributionofprecipitation
AT aipingliang differencesinnanostructureandhydrophobicityofcicadacryptotympanaatrataforewingsurfacewiththedistributionofprecipitation
_version_ 1721336920637702144