Differences in Nanostructure and Hydrophobicity of Cicada (Cryptotympana atrata) Forewing Surface with the Distribution of Precipitation
Although the cicada wing has a variety of functions and the nanostructure and surface properties of many species have been extensively investigated, there are no reports investigating diversity of nanostructures and wetting properties within a single species collected at locations with different rai...
Main Authors: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Hindawi Limited
2018-01-01
|
Series: | Applied Bionics and Biomechanics |
Online Access: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2018/5305847 |
id |
doaj-6c8e6ff82c7246c39ed66feb83dd0eda |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-6c8e6ff82c7246c39ed66feb83dd0eda2021-07-02T06:41:47ZengHindawi LimitedApplied Bionics and Biomechanics1176-23221754-21032018-01-01201810.1155/2018/53058475305847Differences in Nanostructure and Hydrophobicity of Cicada (Cryptotympana atrata) Forewing Surface with the Distribution of PrecipitationMingxia Sun0Jiajing Zhang1Gregory S. Watson2Jolanta A. Watson3Dong Han4Aiping Liang5Key Laboratory of Systematic and Evolution, Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beichen West Road 1-5, Chaoyang District, Beijing 100101, ChinaZhongguancun Middle School, Kexueyuannan Road 14, Haidian District, Beijing 100080, ChinaFaculty of Science, Health, Education and Engineering, University of the Sunshine Coast, Fraser Coast Campus, Hervey Bay, QLD 4655, AustraliaFaculty of Science, Health, Education and Engineering, University of the Sunshine Coast, Fraser Coast Campus, Hervey Bay, QLD 4655, AustraliaNational Center for Nanoscience and Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, No. 11, Beiyitiao Zhongguancun, Haidian District, Beijing 100190, ChinaKey Laboratory of Systematic and Evolution, Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beichen West Road 1-5, Chaoyang District, Beijing 100101, ChinaAlthough the cicada wing has a variety of functions and the nanostructure and surface properties of many species have been extensively investigated, there are no reports investigating diversity of nanostructures and wetting properties within a single species collected at locations with different rainfall conditions. In this study, the hydrophobicity and nanostructure dimensions of the forewing surface of Cryptotympana atrata were measured, based on specimens collected from 12 distributions with varying precipitation averages in China and Japan. The relationships among hydrophobicity, nanostructures, and precipitation were analyzed, and the adaption of hydrophobic nanostructures under different wet environments is discussed. The precipitation of locations in the years the samples of C. atrata were collected only has an effect on the diameter and spacing of wing surface nanostructure, and the multiple years of precipitation may have an influence on the basic diameter and spacing, as well as the height of protrusions. The rougher the wing surface, the stronger the hydrophobicity which was observed from samples taken where the rainfall conditions of the collection years are high. To our knowledge, this is one special example providing evidence of hydrophobic nanostructures found on a biological surface of a single species which shows adaption for specific wet environments.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2018/5305847 |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Mingxia Sun Jiajing Zhang Gregory S. Watson Jolanta A. Watson Dong Han Aiping Liang |
spellingShingle |
Mingxia Sun Jiajing Zhang Gregory S. Watson Jolanta A. Watson Dong Han Aiping Liang Differences in Nanostructure and Hydrophobicity of Cicada (Cryptotympana atrata) Forewing Surface with the Distribution of Precipitation Applied Bionics and Biomechanics |
author_facet |
Mingxia Sun Jiajing Zhang Gregory S. Watson Jolanta A. Watson Dong Han Aiping Liang |
author_sort |
Mingxia Sun |
title |
Differences in Nanostructure and Hydrophobicity of Cicada (Cryptotympana atrata) Forewing Surface with the Distribution of Precipitation |
title_short |
Differences in Nanostructure and Hydrophobicity of Cicada (Cryptotympana atrata) Forewing Surface with the Distribution of Precipitation |
title_full |
Differences in Nanostructure and Hydrophobicity of Cicada (Cryptotympana atrata) Forewing Surface with the Distribution of Precipitation |
title_fullStr |
Differences in Nanostructure and Hydrophobicity of Cicada (Cryptotympana atrata) Forewing Surface with the Distribution of Precipitation |
title_full_unstemmed |
Differences in Nanostructure and Hydrophobicity of Cicada (Cryptotympana atrata) Forewing Surface with the Distribution of Precipitation |
title_sort |
differences in nanostructure and hydrophobicity of cicada (cryptotympana atrata) forewing surface with the distribution of precipitation |
publisher |
Hindawi Limited |
series |
Applied Bionics and Biomechanics |
issn |
1176-2322 1754-2103 |
publishDate |
2018-01-01 |
description |
Although the cicada wing has a variety of functions and the nanostructure and surface properties of many species have been extensively investigated, there are no reports investigating diversity of nanostructures and wetting properties within a single species collected at locations with different rainfall conditions. In this study, the hydrophobicity and nanostructure dimensions of the forewing surface of Cryptotympana atrata were measured, based on specimens collected from 12 distributions with varying precipitation averages in China and Japan. The relationships among hydrophobicity, nanostructures, and precipitation were analyzed, and the adaption of hydrophobic nanostructures under different wet environments is discussed. The precipitation of locations in the years the samples of C. atrata were collected only has an effect on the diameter and spacing of wing surface nanostructure, and the multiple years of precipitation may have an influence on the basic diameter and spacing, as well as the height of protrusions. The rougher the wing surface, the stronger the hydrophobicity which was observed from samples taken where the rainfall conditions of the collection years are high. To our knowledge, this is one special example providing evidence of hydrophobic nanostructures found on a biological surface of a single species which shows adaption for specific wet environments. |
url |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2018/5305847 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT mingxiasun differencesinnanostructureandhydrophobicityofcicadacryptotympanaatrataforewingsurfacewiththedistributionofprecipitation AT jiajingzhang differencesinnanostructureandhydrophobicityofcicadacryptotympanaatrataforewingsurfacewiththedistributionofprecipitation AT gregoryswatson differencesinnanostructureandhydrophobicityofcicadacryptotympanaatrataforewingsurfacewiththedistributionofprecipitation AT jolantaawatson differencesinnanostructureandhydrophobicityofcicadacryptotympanaatrataforewingsurfacewiththedistributionofprecipitation AT donghan differencesinnanostructureandhydrophobicityofcicadacryptotympanaatrataforewingsurfacewiththedistributionofprecipitation AT aipingliang differencesinnanostructureandhydrophobicityofcicadacryptotympanaatrataforewingsurfacewiththedistributionofprecipitation |
_version_ |
1721336920637702144 |