Utility of anaerobic bottles for the diagnosis of bloodstream infections
Abstract Background Obligate anaerobes usually account for less than 10% of bacteria recovered from blood cultures (BC). The relevance of routine use of the anaerobic bottle is under debate. The aim of this study was to evaluate the utility of anaerobic bottles for the diagnosis of bloodstream infec...
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
BMC
2020-02-01
|
Series: | BMC Infectious Diseases |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1186/s12879-020-4854-x |
id |
doaj-6c8d8cb7b7fa4e94a4a1255e55fdaee2 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-6c8d8cb7b7fa4e94a4a1255e55fdaee22021-02-14T12:07:38ZengBMCBMC Infectious Diseases1471-23342020-02-012011610.1186/s12879-020-4854-xUtility of anaerobic bottles for the diagnosis of bloodstream infectionsM. Lafaurie0E. d’Anglejan1J. L. Donay2D. Glotz3E. Sarfati4M. Mimoun5M. Legrand6E. Oksenhendler7M. Bagot8S. Valade9B. Bercot10J. M. Molina11Department of Infectious Diseases, Saint-Louis Hospital, Paris, University of Paris Diderot Paris 7, Sorbonne Paris Cité, INSERM U941Department of Infectious Diseases, Saint-Louis Hospital, Paris, University of Paris Diderot Paris 7, Sorbonne Paris Cité, INSERM U941Laboratory of Microbiology, Saint-Louis HospitalNephrology Unit, Saint-Louis HospitalDepartment of Digestive and Emergency Surgery, Saint-Louis HospitalDepartment of Plastic Surgery, Saint-Louis HospitalDepartment of Anesthesiology, Critical Care and Burn Unit, St-Louis hospital, University Paris DiderotDepartment of Clinical Immunopathology, Saint-Louis HospitalDermatology Department, Saint-Louis HospitalIntensive Care Unit, Saint-Louis HospitalLaboratory of Microbiology, Saint-Louis HospitalDepartment of Infectious Diseases, Saint-Louis Hospital, Paris, University of Paris Diderot Paris 7, Sorbonne Paris Cité, INSERM U941Abstract Background Obligate anaerobes usually account for less than 10% of bacteria recovered from blood cultures (BC). The relevance of routine use of the anaerobic bottle is under debate. The aim of this study was to evaluate the utility of anaerobic bottles for the diagnosis of bloodstream infections (BSI). Methods We conducted a 6-month, retrospective, monocentric study in a tertiary hospital. All positive BC were grouped into a single episode of bacteremia when drawn within 7 consecutive days. Bacteremia were classified into contaminants and BSI. Charts of patients with BSI due to obligate anaerobes were studied. Results A total of 19,739 blood cultures were collected, 2341 of which (11.9%) were positive. Anaerobic bottles were positive in 1528 (65.3%) of all positive BC but were positive alone (aerobic bottles negative) in 369 (15.8%). Overall 1081 episodes of bacteremia were identified, of which 209 (19.3%) had positive anaerobic bottles alone. The majority 126/209 (60.3%) were contaminants and 83 (39.7%) were BSI. BSI due to facultative anaerobes, obligate aerobes and obligate anaerobes were identified in 67 (80.7%), 3 (3.6%) and 13 (15.7%) of these 83 episodes, respectively. BSI due to obligate anaerobic bacteria were reported in 9 patients with gastro-intestinal disease, in 3 with febrile neutropenia and in 1 burned patient. Conclusions Anaerobic bottles contributed to the diagnosis of a significant number of episodes of bacteremia. Isolated bacteria were mostly contaminants and non-obligate anaerobic pathogens. Rare BSI due to obligate anaerobes were reported mainly in patients with gastro-intestinal disorders and during febrile neutropenia.https://doi.org/10.1186/s12879-020-4854-xBlood cultureBacteremiaAnaerobic |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
M. Lafaurie E. d’Anglejan J. L. Donay D. Glotz E. Sarfati M. Mimoun M. Legrand E. Oksenhendler M. Bagot S. Valade B. Bercot J. M. Molina |
spellingShingle |
M. Lafaurie E. d’Anglejan J. L. Donay D. Glotz E. Sarfati M. Mimoun M. Legrand E. Oksenhendler M. Bagot S. Valade B. Bercot J. M. Molina Utility of anaerobic bottles for the diagnosis of bloodstream infections BMC Infectious Diseases Blood culture Bacteremia Anaerobic |
author_facet |
M. Lafaurie E. d’Anglejan J. L. Donay D. Glotz E. Sarfati M. Mimoun M. Legrand E. Oksenhendler M. Bagot S. Valade B. Bercot J. M. Molina |
author_sort |
M. Lafaurie |
title |
Utility of anaerobic bottles for the diagnosis of bloodstream infections |
title_short |
Utility of anaerobic bottles for the diagnosis of bloodstream infections |
title_full |
Utility of anaerobic bottles for the diagnosis of bloodstream infections |
title_fullStr |
Utility of anaerobic bottles for the diagnosis of bloodstream infections |
title_full_unstemmed |
Utility of anaerobic bottles for the diagnosis of bloodstream infections |
title_sort |
utility of anaerobic bottles for the diagnosis of bloodstream infections |
publisher |
BMC |
series |
BMC Infectious Diseases |
issn |
1471-2334 |
publishDate |
2020-02-01 |
description |
Abstract Background Obligate anaerobes usually account for less than 10% of bacteria recovered from blood cultures (BC). The relevance of routine use of the anaerobic bottle is under debate. The aim of this study was to evaluate the utility of anaerobic bottles for the diagnosis of bloodstream infections (BSI). Methods We conducted a 6-month, retrospective, monocentric study in a tertiary hospital. All positive BC were grouped into a single episode of bacteremia when drawn within 7 consecutive days. Bacteremia were classified into contaminants and BSI. Charts of patients with BSI due to obligate anaerobes were studied. Results A total of 19,739 blood cultures were collected, 2341 of which (11.9%) were positive. Anaerobic bottles were positive in 1528 (65.3%) of all positive BC but were positive alone (aerobic bottles negative) in 369 (15.8%). Overall 1081 episodes of bacteremia were identified, of which 209 (19.3%) had positive anaerobic bottles alone. The majority 126/209 (60.3%) were contaminants and 83 (39.7%) were BSI. BSI due to facultative anaerobes, obligate aerobes and obligate anaerobes were identified in 67 (80.7%), 3 (3.6%) and 13 (15.7%) of these 83 episodes, respectively. BSI due to obligate anaerobic bacteria were reported in 9 patients with gastro-intestinal disease, in 3 with febrile neutropenia and in 1 burned patient. Conclusions Anaerobic bottles contributed to the diagnosis of a significant number of episodes of bacteremia. Isolated bacteria were mostly contaminants and non-obligate anaerobic pathogens. Rare BSI due to obligate anaerobes were reported mainly in patients with gastro-intestinal disorders and during febrile neutropenia. |
topic |
Blood culture Bacteremia Anaerobic |
url |
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12879-020-4854-x |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT mlafaurie utilityofanaerobicbottlesforthediagnosisofbloodstreaminfections AT edanglejan utilityofanaerobicbottlesforthediagnosisofbloodstreaminfections AT jldonay utilityofanaerobicbottlesforthediagnosisofbloodstreaminfections AT dglotz utilityofanaerobicbottlesforthediagnosisofbloodstreaminfections AT esarfati utilityofanaerobicbottlesforthediagnosisofbloodstreaminfections AT mmimoun utilityofanaerobicbottlesforthediagnosisofbloodstreaminfections AT mlegrand utilityofanaerobicbottlesforthediagnosisofbloodstreaminfections AT eoksenhendler utilityofanaerobicbottlesforthediagnosisofbloodstreaminfections AT mbagot utilityofanaerobicbottlesforthediagnosisofbloodstreaminfections AT svalade utilityofanaerobicbottlesforthediagnosisofbloodstreaminfections AT bbercot utilityofanaerobicbottlesforthediagnosisofbloodstreaminfections AT jmmolina utilityofanaerobicbottlesforthediagnosisofbloodstreaminfections |
_version_ |
1724270991592390656 |