Utility of anaerobic bottles for the diagnosis of bloodstream infections

Abstract Background Obligate anaerobes usually account for less than 10% of bacteria recovered from blood cultures (BC). The relevance of routine use of the anaerobic bottle is under debate. The aim of this study was to evaluate the utility of anaerobic bottles for the diagnosis of bloodstream infec...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: M. Lafaurie, E. d’Anglejan, J. L. Donay, D. Glotz, E. Sarfati, M. Mimoun, M. Legrand, E. Oksenhendler, M. Bagot, S. Valade, B. Bercot, J. M. Molina
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2020-02-01
Series:BMC Infectious Diseases
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s12879-020-4854-x
id doaj-6c8d8cb7b7fa4e94a4a1255e55fdaee2
record_format Article
spelling doaj-6c8d8cb7b7fa4e94a4a1255e55fdaee22021-02-14T12:07:38ZengBMCBMC Infectious Diseases1471-23342020-02-012011610.1186/s12879-020-4854-xUtility of anaerobic bottles for the diagnosis of bloodstream infectionsM. Lafaurie0E. d’Anglejan1J. L. Donay2D. Glotz3E. Sarfati4M. Mimoun5M. Legrand6E. Oksenhendler7M. Bagot8S. Valade9B. Bercot10J. M. Molina11Department of Infectious Diseases, Saint-Louis Hospital, Paris, University of Paris Diderot Paris 7, Sorbonne Paris Cité, INSERM U941Department of Infectious Diseases, Saint-Louis Hospital, Paris, University of Paris Diderot Paris 7, Sorbonne Paris Cité, INSERM U941Laboratory of Microbiology, Saint-Louis HospitalNephrology Unit, Saint-Louis HospitalDepartment of Digestive and Emergency Surgery, Saint-Louis HospitalDepartment of Plastic Surgery, Saint-Louis HospitalDepartment of Anesthesiology, Critical Care and Burn Unit, St-Louis hospital, University Paris DiderotDepartment of Clinical Immunopathology, Saint-Louis HospitalDermatology Department, Saint-Louis HospitalIntensive Care Unit, Saint-Louis HospitalLaboratory of Microbiology, Saint-Louis HospitalDepartment of Infectious Diseases, Saint-Louis Hospital, Paris, University of Paris Diderot Paris 7, Sorbonne Paris Cité, INSERM U941Abstract Background Obligate anaerobes usually account for less than 10% of bacteria recovered from blood cultures (BC). The relevance of routine use of the anaerobic bottle is under debate. The aim of this study was to evaluate the utility of anaerobic bottles for the diagnosis of bloodstream infections (BSI). Methods We conducted a 6-month, retrospective, monocentric study in a tertiary hospital. All positive BC were grouped into a single episode of bacteremia when drawn within 7 consecutive days. Bacteremia were classified into contaminants and BSI. Charts of patients with BSI due to obligate anaerobes were studied. Results A total of 19,739 blood cultures were collected, 2341 of which (11.9%) were positive. Anaerobic bottles were positive in 1528 (65.3%) of all positive BC but were positive alone (aerobic bottles negative) in 369 (15.8%). Overall 1081 episodes of bacteremia were identified, of which 209 (19.3%) had positive anaerobic bottles alone. The majority 126/209 (60.3%) were contaminants and 83 (39.7%) were BSI. BSI due to facultative anaerobes, obligate aerobes and obligate anaerobes were identified in 67 (80.7%), 3 (3.6%) and 13 (15.7%) of these 83 episodes, respectively. BSI due to obligate anaerobic bacteria were reported in 9 patients with gastro-intestinal disease, in 3 with febrile neutropenia and in 1 burned patient. Conclusions Anaerobic bottles contributed to the diagnosis of a significant number of episodes of bacteremia. Isolated bacteria were mostly contaminants and non-obligate anaerobic pathogens. Rare BSI due to obligate anaerobes were reported mainly in patients with gastro-intestinal disorders and during febrile neutropenia.https://doi.org/10.1186/s12879-020-4854-xBlood cultureBacteremiaAnaerobic
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author M. Lafaurie
E. d’Anglejan
J. L. Donay
D. Glotz
E. Sarfati
M. Mimoun
M. Legrand
E. Oksenhendler
M. Bagot
S. Valade
B. Bercot
J. M. Molina
spellingShingle M. Lafaurie
E. d’Anglejan
J. L. Donay
D. Glotz
E. Sarfati
M. Mimoun
M. Legrand
E. Oksenhendler
M. Bagot
S. Valade
B. Bercot
J. M. Molina
Utility of anaerobic bottles for the diagnosis of bloodstream infections
BMC Infectious Diseases
Blood culture
Bacteremia
Anaerobic
author_facet M. Lafaurie
E. d’Anglejan
J. L. Donay
D. Glotz
E. Sarfati
M. Mimoun
M. Legrand
E. Oksenhendler
M. Bagot
S. Valade
B. Bercot
J. M. Molina
author_sort M. Lafaurie
title Utility of anaerobic bottles for the diagnosis of bloodstream infections
title_short Utility of anaerobic bottles for the diagnosis of bloodstream infections
title_full Utility of anaerobic bottles for the diagnosis of bloodstream infections
title_fullStr Utility of anaerobic bottles for the diagnosis of bloodstream infections
title_full_unstemmed Utility of anaerobic bottles for the diagnosis of bloodstream infections
title_sort utility of anaerobic bottles for the diagnosis of bloodstream infections
publisher BMC
series BMC Infectious Diseases
issn 1471-2334
publishDate 2020-02-01
description Abstract Background Obligate anaerobes usually account for less than 10% of bacteria recovered from blood cultures (BC). The relevance of routine use of the anaerobic bottle is under debate. The aim of this study was to evaluate the utility of anaerobic bottles for the diagnosis of bloodstream infections (BSI). Methods We conducted a 6-month, retrospective, monocentric study in a tertiary hospital. All positive BC were grouped into a single episode of bacteremia when drawn within 7 consecutive days. Bacteremia were classified into contaminants and BSI. Charts of patients with BSI due to obligate anaerobes were studied. Results A total of 19,739 blood cultures were collected, 2341 of which (11.9%) were positive. Anaerobic bottles were positive in 1528 (65.3%) of all positive BC but were positive alone (aerobic bottles negative) in 369 (15.8%). Overall 1081 episodes of bacteremia were identified, of which 209 (19.3%) had positive anaerobic bottles alone. The majority 126/209 (60.3%) were contaminants and 83 (39.7%) were BSI. BSI due to facultative anaerobes, obligate aerobes and obligate anaerobes were identified in 67 (80.7%), 3 (3.6%) and 13 (15.7%) of these 83 episodes, respectively. BSI due to obligate anaerobic bacteria were reported in 9 patients with gastro-intestinal disease, in 3 with febrile neutropenia and in 1 burned patient. Conclusions Anaerobic bottles contributed to the diagnosis of a significant number of episodes of bacteremia. Isolated bacteria were mostly contaminants and non-obligate anaerobic pathogens. Rare BSI due to obligate anaerobes were reported mainly in patients with gastro-intestinal disorders and during febrile neutropenia.
topic Blood culture
Bacteremia
Anaerobic
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s12879-020-4854-x
work_keys_str_mv AT mlafaurie utilityofanaerobicbottlesforthediagnosisofbloodstreaminfections
AT edanglejan utilityofanaerobicbottlesforthediagnosisofbloodstreaminfections
AT jldonay utilityofanaerobicbottlesforthediagnosisofbloodstreaminfections
AT dglotz utilityofanaerobicbottlesforthediagnosisofbloodstreaminfections
AT esarfati utilityofanaerobicbottlesforthediagnosisofbloodstreaminfections
AT mmimoun utilityofanaerobicbottlesforthediagnosisofbloodstreaminfections
AT mlegrand utilityofanaerobicbottlesforthediagnosisofbloodstreaminfections
AT eoksenhendler utilityofanaerobicbottlesforthediagnosisofbloodstreaminfections
AT mbagot utilityofanaerobicbottlesforthediagnosisofbloodstreaminfections
AT svalade utilityofanaerobicbottlesforthediagnosisofbloodstreaminfections
AT bbercot utilityofanaerobicbottlesforthediagnosisofbloodstreaminfections
AT jmmolina utilityofanaerobicbottlesforthediagnosisofbloodstreaminfections
_version_ 1724270991592390656