Memories of the conquest of Navarre around 1612 and 1712. Navarrese identity before the controversy of Amayur (1921-1931)

The use of the past with a present mind is common purpose, and as show the case of the conquest of Navarre from 1512, has generated controversy regarding the identity of Navarre. From the division between nationalism in the twentieth century, this article discusses some reflections made on the first...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Alfredo Floristán Imízcoz
Format: Article
Language:Spanish
Published: Universidad de Navarra 2012-12-01
Series:Memoria y Civilización
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.unav.edu/publicaciones/revistas/index.php/myc/article/view/1712
id doaj-6c894aa9407547359df0c96764b5dfe1
record_format Article
spelling doaj-6c894aa9407547359df0c96764b5dfe12020-11-24T21:56:58ZspaUniversidad de NavarraMemoria y Civilización1139-01072254-63672012-12-011511291428Memories of the conquest of Navarre around 1612 and 1712. Navarrese identity before the controversy of Amayur (1921-1931)Alfredo Floristán ImízcozThe use of the past with a present mind is common purpose, and as show the case of the conquest of Navarre from 1512, has generated controversy regarding the identity of Navarre. From the division between nationalism in the twentieth century, this article discusses some reflections made on the first and second centenaries of this events, showing two positions: "navarrista" and those who asks annexation to France, as distant background in the use of the past with present purposes.https://www.unav.edu/publicaciones/revistas/index.php/myc/article/view/1712conquista de navarrahistoriografíacentenariosidentidadprudencio sandovalandré favynfrancisco alesónjohannes daniel schoepflin
collection DOAJ
language Spanish
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Alfredo Floristán Imízcoz
spellingShingle Alfredo Floristán Imízcoz
Memories of the conquest of Navarre around 1612 and 1712. Navarrese identity before the controversy of Amayur (1921-1931)
Memoria y Civilización
conquista de navarra
historiografía
centenarios
identidad
prudencio sandoval
andré favyn
francisco alesón
johannes daniel schoepflin
author_facet Alfredo Floristán Imízcoz
author_sort Alfredo Floristán Imízcoz
title Memories of the conquest of Navarre around 1612 and 1712. Navarrese identity before the controversy of Amayur (1921-1931)
title_short Memories of the conquest of Navarre around 1612 and 1712. Navarrese identity before the controversy of Amayur (1921-1931)
title_full Memories of the conquest of Navarre around 1612 and 1712. Navarrese identity before the controversy of Amayur (1921-1931)
title_fullStr Memories of the conquest of Navarre around 1612 and 1712. Navarrese identity before the controversy of Amayur (1921-1931)
title_full_unstemmed Memories of the conquest of Navarre around 1612 and 1712. Navarrese identity before the controversy of Amayur (1921-1931)
title_sort memories of the conquest of navarre around 1612 and 1712. navarrese identity before the controversy of amayur (1921-1931)
publisher Universidad de Navarra
series Memoria y Civilización
issn 1139-0107
2254-6367
publishDate 2012-12-01
description The use of the past with a present mind is common purpose, and as show the case of the conquest of Navarre from 1512, has generated controversy regarding the identity of Navarre. From the division between nationalism in the twentieth century, this article discusses some reflections made on the first and second centenaries of this events, showing two positions: "navarrista" and those who asks annexation to France, as distant background in the use of the past with present purposes.
topic conquista de navarra
historiografía
centenarios
identidad
prudencio sandoval
andré favyn
francisco alesón
johannes daniel schoepflin
url https://www.unav.edu/publicaciones/revistas/index.php/myc/article/view/1712
work_keys_str_mv AT alfredofloristanimizcoz memoriesoftheconquestofnavarrearound1612and1712navarreseidentitybeforethecontroversyofamayur19211931
_version_ 1725856157449322496