Reform of Russian Education System: Expert Opinion and parent’s atti-tude to it

The data of polls on ongoing reforms in education is carefully analyzed. It is shown that the number of the experts who are positively perceiving reforms, steadily decreases on the “top managers – teachers” axis. About a half of university professors and school teachers belong to transformations wat...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: G. A. Kliucharev (Klyucharev)
Format: Article
Language:Russian
Published: Russian Academy of Sciences, Federal Center of Theoretical and Applied Sociology 2014-09-01
Series:Социологический журнал
Online Access:http://jour.fnisc.ru/upload/journals/1/articles/513/submission/proof/513-61-2360-1-10-20150330.pdf
id doaj-6c80fc0f0ec5423da6ff8ecde32b2683
record_format Article
spelling doaj-6c80fc0f0ec5423da6ff8ecde32b26832020-11-25T03:27:01ZrusRussian Academy of Sciences, Federal Center of Theoretical and Applied SociologyСоциологический журнал1562-24952014-09-01203708510.19181/socjour.2014.3.513513Reform of Russian Education System: Expert Opinion and parent’s atti-tude to itG. A. Kliucharev (Klyucharev)0Institute of Sociology of the Russian Academy of SciencesThe data of polls on ongoing reforms in education is carefully analyzed. It is shown that the number of the experts who are positively perceiving reforms, steadily decreases on the “top managers – teachers” axis. About a half of university professors and school teachers belong to transformations watchfully and consider them mostly premature. However, the available data of monitoring “Reforms in Russian Education”, conducted by the Federal Research Sociological Center under the leadership of Dr. Frantz Sheregi in 2009 and 2012 (total sample N = 5530) testify that not all planned actions manage to be realized up to the end. The reasons of failures in many respects are explained by lack of interest in modernization of education from various public forces, misunderstanding or ignorance from their party of expected advantages and benefits which will bring, at their appropriate execution, reforms. As a result — the regional authorities do not provide sufficient support of transformations. The exception is made only by “the highest commanders” and heads who owing to the situation are rather well motivated on reforms.The conclusion is that low productivity of held events is explained by, at least, two essential factors is drawn. First, this absence or a wrong social and economic assessment of efficiency of education in the relations with a labor market. The education system remains true only to itself and doesn't want to be guided by other players. Secondly, it is a lack of personal interest of ordinary actors of reforms — teachers, tutors, chiefs of the bottom and average level.http://jour.fnisc.ru/upload/journals/1/articles/513/submission/proof/513-61-2360-1-10-20150330.pdf
collection DOAJ
language Russian
format Article
sources DOAJ
author G. A. Kliucharev (Klyucharev)
spellingShingle G. A. Kliucharev (Klyucharev)
Reform of Russian Education System: Expert Opinion and parent’s atti-tude to it
Социологический журнал
author_facet G. A. Kliucharev (Klyucharev)
author_sort G. A. Kliucharev (Klyucharev)
title Reform of Russian Education System: Expert Opinion and parent’s atti-tude to it
title_short Reform of Russian Education System: Expert Opinion and parent’s atti-tude to it
title_full Reform of Russian Education System: Expert Opinion and parent’s atti-tude to it
title_fullStr Reform of Russian Education System: Expert Opinion and parent’s atti-tude to it
title_full_unstemmed Reform of Russian Education System: Expert Opinion and parent’s atti-tude to it
title_sort reform of russian education system: expert opinion and parent’s atti-tude to it
publisher Russian Academy of Sciences, Federal Center of Theoretical and Applied Sociology
series Социологический журнал
issn 1562-2495
publishDate 2014-09-01
description The data of polls on ongoing reforms in education is carefully analyzed. It is shown that the number of the experts who are positively perceiving reforms, steadily decreases on the “top managers – teachers” axis. About a half of university professors and school teachers belong to transformations watchfully and consider them mostly premature. However, the available data of monitoring “Reforms in Russian Education”, conducted by the Federal Research Sociological Center under the leadership of Dr. Frantz Sheregi in 2009 and 2012 (total sample N = 5530) testify that not all planned actions manage to be realized up to the end. The reasons of failures in many respects are explained by lack of interest in modernization of education from various public forces, misunderstanding or ignorance from their party of expected advantages and benefits which will bring, at their appropriate execution, reforms. As a result — the regional authorities do not provide sufficient support of transformations. The exception is made only by “the highest commanders” and heads who owing to the situation are rather well motivated on reforms.The conclusion is that low productivity of held events is explained by, at least, two essential factors is drawn. First, this absence or a wrong social and economic assessment of efficiency of education in the relations with a labor market. The education system remains true only to itself and doesn't want to be guided by other players. Secondly, it is a lack of personal interest of ordinary actors of reforms — teachers, tutors, chiefs of the bottom and average level.
url http://jour.fnisc.ru/upload/journals/1/articles/513/submission/proof/513-61-2360-1-10-20150330.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT gakliucharevklyucharev reformofrussianeducationsystemexpertopinionandparentsattitudetoit
_version_ 1724589986431369216