Organizations as real and ephemeral

Abstract Currently a dilemma within organization studies seems to be represented by, on the one hand, proponents who argue for a retro-wave, to go back to the original ideas of organization studies, the core tasks of enterprises and importance of the relevance of organization studies to practitioner...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Bente Elkjaer
Format: Article
Language:deu
Published: SpringerOpen 2017-04-01
Series:Zeitschrift für Weiterbildungsforschung - Report
Subjects:
Online Access:http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s40955-017-0086-0
id doaj-6c77e132ade54eb8984d7507cea0712d
record_format Article
spelling doaj-6c77e132ade54eb8984d7507cea0712d2020-11-25T00:47:06ZdeuSpringerOpenZeitschrift für Weiterbildungsforschung - Report2364-00142364-00222017-04-01401536810.1007/s40955-017-0086-0Organizations as real and ephemeralBente Elkjaer0Department of Education, Aarhus UniversityAbstract Currently a dilemma within organization studies seems to be represented by, on the one hand, proponents who argue for a retro-wave, to go back to the original ideas of organization studies, the core tasks of enterprises and importance of the relevance of organization studies to practitioners. On the other hand, another contemporary movement may be observed within organization studies, which is to defend the use of general theories of the social sciences. This latter trend is represented through the language of organizations as processes and practices, sometimes termed the ‘process-’ and ‘practice-turn’. Although I tend to subscribe to the latter position, I aim to illustrate the value of bridging the dilemma of a canon of history and tradition and the inclusion of more general social science theories within organization studies. I also argue that it is beneficial to hold the eye both on organizations as entities and to understand persons’ interactions around work as pivotal for education and learning related to enterprises. We both need the canon and organizations as continuously emerging; organizations as units and the interactions of its persons. I make the argument standing on the shoulders of pragmatist philosophy (particularly the works by John Dewey) and the basic understanding that present experiences are always both grounded in history and tradition (the canon) and dynamically oriented towards the future (emergent).http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s40955-017-0086-0Organizational learningOrganization studiesFunctionalismEmergencePractice-turnPragmatism
collection DOAJ
language deu
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Bente Elkjaer
spellingShingle Bente Elkjaer
Organizations as real and ephemeral
Zeitschrift für Weiterbildungsforschung - Report
Organizational learning
Organization studies
Functionalism
Emergence
Practice-turn
Pragmatism
author_facet Bente Elkjaer
author_sort Bente Elkjaer
title Organizations as real and ephemeral
title_short Organizations as real and ephemeral
title_full Organizations as real and ephemeral
title_fullStr Organizations as real and ephemeral
title_full_unstemmed Organizations as real and ephemeral
title_sort organizations as real and ephemeral
publisher SpringerOpen
series Zeitschrift für Weiterbildungsforschung - Report
issn 2364-0014
2364-0022
publishDate 2017-04-01
description Abstract Currently a dilemma within organization studies seems to be represented by, on the one hand, proponents who argue for a retro-wave, to go back to the original ideas of organization studies, the core tasks of enterprises and importance of the relevance of organization studies to practitioners. On the other hand, another contemporary movement may be observed within organization studies, which is to defend the use of general theories of the social sciences. This latter trend is represented through the language of organizations as processes and practices, sometimes termed the ‘process-’ and ‘practice-turn’. Although I tend to subscribe to the latter position, I aim to illustrate the value of bridging the dilemma of a canon of history and tradition and the inclusion of more general social science theories within organization studies. I also argue that it is beneficial to hold the eye both on organizations as entities and to understand persons’ interactions around work as pivotal for education and learning related to enterprises. We both need the canon and organizations as continuously emerging; organizations as units and the interactions of its persons. I make the argument standing on the shoulders of pragmatist philosophy (particularly the works by John Dewey) and the basic understanding that present experiences are always both grounded in history and tradition (the canon) and dynamically oriented towards the future (emergent).
topic Organizational learning
Organization studies
Functionalism
Emergence
Practice-turn
Pragmatism
url http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s40955-017-0086-0
work_keys_str_mv AT benteelkjaer organizationsasrealandephemeral
_version_ 1725261940883718144