Comparison of Oral Versus Vaginal Misoprostol for Induction of Labour at Term
Background: To compare the efficacy and safety of oral versus vaginal administration of Misoprostol for induction of labour at term. Methods: In this interventional study primigravida were assigned in two groups; A and B, using non-probability convenient sampling technique. Group-A (n=50) had Misop...
Main Author: | Zoqeen Akhtar |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Rawalpindi Medical University
2010-12-01
|
Series: | Journal of Rawalpindi Medical College |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.journalrmc.com/index.php/JRMC/article/view/667 |
Similar Items
-
Comparison of Oral Versus Vaginal Misoprostol for Induction of Labour at Term
by: Zoqeen Akhtar
Published: (2010-12-01) -
Misoprostol vaginal insert versus misoprostol vaginal tablets for the induction of labour: a cohort study
by: Daniele Bolla, et al.
Published: (2018-05-01) -
Oral misoprostol versus dinoprostone vaginal tablets for labor induction
by: Khaled Ibrahim Abu El aish, et al.
Published: (2013-06-01) -
Sublingual misoprostol versus dinoprostone gel in labour induction
by: Juveria Jahangir, et al.
Published: (2020-01-01) -
Comparative Study of Oral and Vaginal Misoprostol for Induction of Labour, Maternal and Foetal Outcome
by: Kambhampati Komala, et al.
Published: (2013-12-01)