Performance Evaluation of Keyword Extraction Methods and Visualization for Student Online Comments
Topic keyword extraction (as a typical task in information retrieval) refers to extracting the core keywords from document topics. In an online environment, students often post comments in subject forums. The automatic and accurate extraction of keywords from these comments are beneficial to lecture...
Main Authors: | , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
MDPI AG
2020-11-01
|
Series: | Symmetry |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.mdpi.com/2073-8994/12/11/1923 |
id |
doaj-6c55b20cf78745a59fb0de8e6cbf8906 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-6c55b20cf78745a59fb0de8e6cbf89062020-11-25T04:10:36ZengMDPI AGSymmetry2073-89942020-11-01121923192310.3390/sym12111923Performance Evaluation of Keyword Extraction Methods and Visualization for Student Online CommentsFeng Liu0Xiaodi Huang1Weidong Huang2Sophia Xiaoxia Duan3School of Computing and Mathematics, Charles Sturt University, Albury 2640, AustraliaSchool of Computing and Mathematics, Charles Sturt University, Albury 2640, AustraliaFaculty of Transdisciplinary Innovation, University of Technology Sydney, Sydney 2007, AustraliaSchool of Accounting, Information Systems and Supply Chain, RMIT University, Melbourne 3000, AustraliaTopic keyword extraction (as a typical task in information retrieval) refers to extracting the core keywords from document topics. In an online environment, students often post comments in subject forums. The automatic and accurate extraction of keywords from these comments are beneficial to lecturers (particular when it comes to repeatedly delivered subjects). In this paper, we compare the performance of traditional machine learning algorithms and two deep learning methods in extracting topic keywords from student comments posted in subject forums. For this purpose, we collected student comment data from a period of two years, manually tagging part of the raw data for our experiments. Based on this dataset, we comprehensively compared the five typical algorithms of naïve Bayes, logistic regression, support vector machine, convolutional neural networks, and Long Short-Term Memory with Attention (Att-LSTM). The performances were measured by the four evaluation metrics. We further examined the keywords by visualization. From the results of our experiment and visualization, we conclude that the Att-LSTM method is the best approach for topic keyword extraction from student comments. Further, the results from the algorithms and visualization are symmetry, to some degree. In particular, the extracted topics from the comments posted at the same stages of different teaching sessions are, almost, reflection symmetry.https://www.mdpi.com/2073-8994/12/11/1923student commentsmetricsmachine learningtopic keywords extractionNaïve BayesLogR |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Feng Liu Xiaodi Huang Weidong Huang Sophia Xiaoxia Duan |
spellingShingle |
Feng Liu Xiaodi Huang Weidong Huang Sophia Xiaoxia Duan Performance Evaluation of Keyword Extraction Methods and Visualization for Student Online Comments Symmetry student comments metrics machine learning topic keywords extraction Naïve Bayes LogR |
author_facet |
Feng Liu Xiaodi Huang Weidong Huang Sophia Xiaoxia Duan |
author_sort |
Feng Liu |
title |
Performance Evaluation of Keyword Extraction Methods and Visualization for Student Online Comments |
title_short |
Performance Evaluation of Keyword Extraction Methods and Visualization for Student Online Comments |
title_full |
Performance Evaluation of Keyword Extraction Methods and Visualization for Student Online Comments |
title_fullStr |
Performance Evaluation of Keyword Extraction Methods and Visualization for Student Online Comments |
title_full_unstemmed |
Performance Evaluation of Keyword Extraction Methods and Visualization for Student Online Comments |
title_sort |
performance evaluation of keyword extraction methods and visualization for student online comments |
publisher |
MDPI AG |
series |
Symmetry |
issn |
2073-8994 |
publishDate |
2020-11-01 |
description |
Topic keyword extraction (as a typical task in information retrieval) refers to extracting the core keywords from document topics. In an online environment, students often post comments in subject forums. The automatic and accurate extraction of keywords from these comments are beneficial to lecturers (particular when it comes to repeatedly delivered subjects). In this paper, we compare the performance of traditional machine learning algorithms and two deep learning methods in extracting topic keywords from student comments posted in subject forums. For this purpose, we collected student comment data from a period of two years, manually tagging part of the raw data for our experiments. Based on this dataset, we comprehensively compared the five typical algorithms of naïve Bayes, logistic regression, support vector machine, convolutional neural networks, and Long Short-Term Memory with Attention (Att-LSTM). The performances were measured by the four evaluation metrics. We further examined the keywords by visualization. From the results of our experiment and visualization, we conclude that the Att-LSTM method is the best approach for topic keyword extraction from student comments. Further, the results from the algorithms and visualization are symmetry, to some degree. In particular, the extracted topics from the comments posted at the same stages of different teaching sessions are, almost, reflection symmetry. |
topic |
student comments metrics machine learning topic keywords extraction Naïve Bayes LogR |
url |
https://www.mdpi.com/2073-8994/12/11/1923 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT fengliu performanceevaluationofkeywordextractionmethodsandvisualizationforstudentonlinecomments AT xiaodihuang performanceevaluationofkeywordextractionmethodsandvisualizationforstudentonlinecomments AT weidonghuang performanceevaluationofkeywordextractionmethodsandvisualizationforstudentonlinecomments AT sophiaxiaoxiaduan performanceevaluationofkeywordextractionmethodsandvisualizationforstudentonlinecomments |
_version_ |
1724419951633104896 |