Influence of application of Hottel’s zonal model and six-flux model of thermal radiation on numerical simulations results of pulverized coal fired furnace

Difference of results of numerical simulation of pulverized coal fired furnace when mathematical models contain various radiation models has been described in paper. Two sets of numerical simulations of pulverized coal fired furnace of 210 MWe power boiler have been performed. One numerical simu...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Crnomarkovic Nenad D., Sijercic Miroslav A., Belosevic Srđan V., Tucakovic Dragan R., Zivanovic Titoslav V.
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: VINCA Institute of Nuclear Sciences 2012-01-01
Series:Thermal Science
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.doiserbia.nb.rs/img/doi/0354-9836/2012/0354-98361100126C.pdf
id doaj-6c4919d31b194df798faab0f3a2ccb3b
record_format Article
spelling doaj-6c4919d31b194df798faab0f3a2ccb3b2021-01-02T04:58:31ZengVINCA Institute of Nuclear SciencesThermal Science0354-98362012-01-0116127128210.2298/TSCI110627126CInfluence of application of Hottel’s zonal model and six-flux model of thermal radiation on numerical simulations results of pulverized coal fired furnaceCrnomarkovic Nenad D.Sijercic Miroslav A.Belosevic Srđan V.Tucakovic Dragan R.Zivanovic Titoslav V.Difference of results of numerical simulation of pulverized coal fired furnace when mathematical models contain various radiation models has been described in paper. Two sets of numerical simulations of pulverized coal fired furnace of 210 MWe power boiler have been performed. One numerical simulation has contained Hottel’s zonal model, whereas the other numerical simulation has contained six-flux model. Other details of numerical simulations have been identical. The influence of radiation models has been examined through comparison of selected variables (gas-phase temperature, oxygen concentration, and absorbed radiative heat rate of surface zones of rear and right furnace walls), selected global parameters of furnace operation (total absorbed heat rate by all furnace walls and furnace exit gas-phase temperature). Computation time has been compared as well. Spatially distributed variables have been compared through maximal local differences and mean differences. Maximal local difference of gas-phase temperature has been 8.44%. Maximal local difference of absorbed radiative heat rate of the surface zones has been almost 80.0%. Difference of global parameters of furnace operation has been expressed in percents of value obtained by mathematical model containing Hottel’s zonal model and has not been bigger than 7.0%. Computation time for calculation of 1000 iterations has been approximately the same. Comparison with other radiation models is necessary for assessment of differences.http://www.doiserbia.nb.rs/img/doi/0354-9836/2012/0354-98361100126C.pdfnumerical simulationpulverized coalthermal radiationsixflux modelHottel’s zonal model
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Crnomarkovic Nenad D.
Sijercic Miroslav A.
Belosevic Srđan V.
Tucakovic Dragan R.
Zivanovic Titoslav V.
spellingShingle Crnomarkovic Nenad D.
Sijercic Miroslav A.
Belosevic Srđan V.
Tucakovic Dragan R.
Zivanovic Titoslav V.
Influence of application of Hottel’s zonal model and six-flux model of thermal radiation on numerical simulations results of pulverized coal fired furnace
Thermal Science
numerical simulation
pulverized coal
thermal radiation
sixflux model
Hottel’s zonal model
author_facet Crnomarkovic Nenad D.
Sijercic Miroslav A.
Belosevic Srđan V.
Tucakovic Dragan R.
Zivanovic Titoslav V.
author_sort Crnomarkovic Nenad D.
title Influence of application of Hottel’s zonal model and six-flux model of thermal radiation on numerical simulations results of pulverized coal fired furnace
title_short Influence of application of Hottel’s zonal model and six-flux model of thermal radiation on numerical simulations results of pulverized coal fired furnace
title_full Influence of application of Hottel’s zonal model and six-flux model of thermal radiation on numerical simulations results of pulverized coal fired furnace
title_fullStr Influence of application of Hottel’s zonal model and six-flux model of thermal radiation on numerical simulations results of pulverized coal fired furnace
title_full_unstemmed Influence of application of Hottel’s zonal model and six-flux model of thermal radiation on numerical simulations results of pulverized coal fired furnace
title_sort influence of application of hottel’s zonal model and six-flux model of thermal radiation on numerical simulations results of pulverized coal fired furnace
publisher VINCA Institute of Nuclear Sciences
series Thermal Science
issn 0354-9836
publishDate 2012-01-01
description Difference of results of numerical simulation of pulverized coal fired furnace when mathematical models contain various radiation models has been described in paper. Two sets of numerical simulations of pulverized coal fired furnace of 210 MWe power boiler have been performed. One numerical simulation has contained Hottel’s zonal model, whereas the other numerical simulation has contained six-flux model. Other details of numerical simulations have been identical. The influence of radiation models has been examined through comparison of selected variables (gas-phase temperature, oxygen concentration, and absorbed radiative heat rate of surface zones of rear and right furnace walls), selected global parameters of furnace operation (total absorbed heat rate by all furnace walls and furnace exit gas-phase temperature). Computation time has been compared as well. Spatially distributed variables have been compared through maximal local differences and mean differences. Maximal local difference of gas-phase temperature has been 8.44%. Maximal local difference of absorbed radiative heat rate of the surface zones has been almost 80.0%. Difference of global parameters of furnace operation has been expressed in percents of value obtained by mathematical model containing Hottel’s zonal model and has not been bigger than 7.0%. Computation time for calculation of 1000 iterations has been approximately the same. Comparison with other radiation models is necessary for assessment of differences.
topic numerical simulation
pulverized coal
thermal radiation
sixflux model
Hottel’s zonal model
url http://www.doiserbia.nb.rs/img/doi/0354-9836/2012/0354-98361100126C.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT crnomarkovicnenadd influenceofapplicationofhottelszonalmodelandsixfluxmodelofthermalradiationonnumericalsimulationsresultsofpulverizedcoalfiredfurnace
AT sijercicmiroslava influenceofapplicationofhottelszonalmodelandsixfluxmodelofthermalradiationonnumericalsimulationsresultsofpulverizedcoalfiredfurnace
AT belosevicsrđanv influenceofapplicationofhottelszonalmodelandsixfluxmodelofthermalradiationonnumericalsimulationsresultsofpulverizedcoalfiredfurnace
AT tucakovicdraganr influenceofapplicationofhottelszonalmodelandsixfluxmodelofthermalradiationonnumericalsimulationsresultsofpulverizedcoalfiredfurnace
AT zivanovictitoslavv influenceofapplicationofhottelszonalmodelandsixfluxmodelofthermalradiationonnumericalsimulationsresultsofpulverizedcoalfiredfurnace
_version_ 1724360037191647232