Communication Model for Built Heritage Assets Going from Knowing to Identification

Abstract The Communication Model of Built Heritage Assets (COBA) refers to several scientific theories in the realm of learning and cognition. The idea of the COBA-Model is to support and stimulate a more professional heritage communication and a more efficient use of existing resources. Thus, the i...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Matthias Ripp, Susanne Hauer
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SpringerOpen 2017-12-01
Series:Built Heritage
Subjects:
Online Access:http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/BF03545653
id doaj-6c490dba74f24fae845c4bbfd1349b71
record_format Article
spelling doaj-6c490dba74f24fae845c4bbfd1349b712020-11-25T02:49:29ZengSpringerOpenBuilt Heritage2096-30412662-68022017-12-011411010.1186/BF03545653Communication Model for Built Heritage Assets Going from Knowing to IdentificationMatthias Ripp0Susanne Hauer1World Heritage CoordinationWorld Heritage CoordinationAbstract The Communication Model of Built Heritage Assets (COBA) refers to several scientific theories in the realm of learning and cognition. The idea of the COBA-Model is to support and stimulate a more professional heritage communication and a more efficient use of existing resources. Thus, the identification of citizens with their Built Heritage Asset should be increased in order to get their support in allocating more resources to and preserving cultural heritage. It shall also improve the visitor experiences and in doing so enhance the impacts and benefits from different learning situations. At the first level, the identification process only touches the social identity. Over the course of the next stages the citizen will become more actively involved. Finally, at the expert level at stage five, the expert multiplier is enabled not only to communicate the heritage asset and its values, its characteristics and context but to make adequate decisions. Additionally, these stages should help to broaden the horizon of heritage practitioners and stimulate new ideas as well as unconventional ways of heritage communication.http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/BF03545653heritagecommunicationinterpretation
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Matthias Ripp
Susanne Hauer
spellingShingle Matthias Ripp
Susanne Hauer
Communication Model for Built Heritage Assets Going from Knowing to Identification
Built Heritage
heritage
communication
interpretation
author_facet Matthias Ripp
Susanne Hauer
author_sort Matthias Ripp
title Communication Model for Built Heritage Assets Going from Knowing to Identification
title_short Communication Model for Built Heritage Assets Going from Knowing to Identification
title_full Communication Model for Built Heritage Assets Going from Knowing to Identification
title_fullStr Communication Model for Built Heritage Assets Going from Knowing to Identification
title_full_unstemmed Communication Model for Built Heritage Assets Going from Knowing to Identification
title_sort communication model for built heritage assets going from knowing to identification
publisher SpringerOpen
series Built Heritage
issn 2096-3041
2662-6802
publishDate 2017-12-01
description Abstract The Communication Model of Built Heritage Assets (COBA) refers to several scientific theories in the realm of learning and cognition. The idea of the COBA-Model is to support and stimulate a more professional heritage communication and a more efficient use of existing resources. Thus, the identification of citizens with their Built Heritage Asset should be increased in order to get their support in allocating more resources to and preserving cultural heritage. It shall also improve the visitor experiences and in doing so enhance the impacts and benefits from different learning situations. At the first level, the identification process only touches the social identity. Over the course of the next stages the citizen will become more actively involved. Finally, at the expert level at stage five, the expert multiplier is enabled not only to communicate the heritage asset and its values, its characteristics and context but to make adequate decisions. Additionally, these stages should help to broaden the horizon of heritage practitioners and stimulate new ideas as well as unconventional ways of heritage communication.
topic heritage
communication
interpretation
url http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/BF03545653
work_keys_str_mv AT matthiasripp communicationmodelforbuiltheritageassetsgoingfromknowingtoidentification
AT susannehauer communicationmodelforbuiltheritageassetsgoingfromknowingtoidentification
_version_ 1724743156009795584