Who Drives Green Innovation? A Game Theoretical Analysis of a Closed-Loop Supply Chain under Different Power Structures

As awareness of environmental protection increases worldwide, enterprises have been building their supply chains in ways that conserve natural resources and minimize the creation of pollutants. One of the practical ways to make supply chains more sustainable is for enterprises to utilize green innov...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Dooho Lee
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2020-03-01
Series:International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/7/2274
id doaj-6c37c67806b54d6abe36b8014da3e2cb
record_format Article
spelling doaj-6c37c67806b54d6abe36b8014da3e2cb2020-11-25T02:44:16ZengMDPI AGInternational Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health1661-78271660-46012020-03-01172274227410.3390/ijerph17072274Who Drives Green Innovation? A Game Theoretical Analysis of a Closed-Loop Supply Chain under Different Power StructuresDooho Lee0Division of Software, Media, and Industrial Engineering, Kangwon National University, 346 Joongang-ro, Samcheok-si, Gangwon-do 29513, KoreaAs awareness of environmental protection increases worldwide, enterprises have been building their supply chains in ways that conserve natural resources and minimize the creation of pollutants. One of the practical ways to make supply chains more sustainable is for enterprises to utilize green innovation strategies and to increase resource reuse. In this work, we focus on a closed-loop supply chain (CLSC) consisting of a manufacturer, a retailer, and a collector. In the investigated CLSC, the manufacturer and the retailer drive the green innovation strategy either individually or simultaneously to boost market demand. In the reverse flow of the CLSC, the collector is responsible for collecting consumers’ used products and transferring them to the manufacturer for remanufacturing. By combining two types of the market leadership and three types of green innovation strategies, we establish six different Stackelberg game models and solve them analytically. Through an extensive comparative analysis, we show who should have market leadership and who should drive the green innovation strategy in the CLSC. Various numerical examples are also given to support our major findings. One of our key findings suggests that the supply chain members must participate in green innovation activities at the same time to achieve a win-win scenario in the CLSC.https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/7/2274recyclinggreen innovation effortpower structureclosed-loop supply chaingame theory
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Dooho Lee
spellingShingle Dooho Lee
Who Drives Green Innovation? A Game Theoretical Analysis of a Closed-Loop Supply Chain under Different Power Structures
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
recycling
green innovation effort
power structure
closed-loop supply chain
game theory
author_facet Dooho Lee
author_sort Dooho Lee
title Who Drives Green Innovation? A Game Theoretical Analysis of a Closed-Loop Supply Chain under Different Power Structures
title_short Who Drives Green Innovation? A Game Theoretical Analysis of a Closed-Loop Supply Chain under Different Power Structures
title_full Who Drives Green Innovation? A Game Theoretical Analysis of a Closed-Loop Supply Chain under Different Power Structures
title_fullStr Who Drives Green Innovation? A Game Theoretical Analysis of a Closed-Loop Supply Chain under Different Power Structures
title_full_unstemmed Who Drives Green Innovation? A Game Theoretical Analysis of a Closed-Loop Supply Chain under Different Power Structures
title_sort who drives green innovation? a game theoretical analysis of a closed-loop supply chain under different power structures
publisher MDPI AG
series International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
issn 1661-7827
1660-4601
publishDate 2020-03-01
description As awareness of environmental protection increases worldwide, enterprises have been building their supply chains in ways that conserve natural resources and minimize the creation of pollutants. One of the practical ways to make supply chains more sustainable is for enterprises to utilize green innovation strategies and to increase resource reuse. In this work, we focus on a closed-loop supply chain (CLSC) consisting of a manufacturer, a retailer, and a collector. In the investigated CLSC, the manufacturer and the retailer drive the green innovation strategy either individually or simultaneously to boost market demand. In the reverse flow of the CLSC, the collector is responsible for collecting consumers’ used products and transferring them to the manufacturer for remanufacturing. By combining two types of the market leadership and three types of green innovation strategies, we establish six different Stackelberg game models and solve them analytically. Through an extensive comparative analysis, we show who should have market leadership and who should drive the green innovation strategy in the CLSC. Various numerical examples are also given to support our major findings. One of our key findings suggests that the supply chain members must participate in green innovation activities at the same time to achieve a win-win scenario in the CLSC.
topic recycling
green innovation effort
power structure
closed-loop supply chain
game theory
url https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/7/2274
work_keys_str_mv AT dooholee whodrivesgreeninnovationagametheoreticalanalysisofaclosedloopsupplychainunderdifferentpowerstructures
_version_ 1724766692593106944