Low field magnetic resonance imaging of the equine distal interphalangeal joint: Comparison between weight-bearing and non-weight-bearing conditions.
This descriptive study aimed to compare the magnetic resonance appearance of the distal interphalangeal joint articular cartilage between standing weight-bearing and non-weight-bearing conditions. Ten forefeet of live horses were scanned in a standing low-field magnetic resonance system (0.27 T). Af...
Main Authors: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
2019-01-01
|
Series: | PLoS ONE |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0211101 |
id |
doaj-6c2f628f7f70428bb070df34b7528a2f |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-6c2f628f7f70428bb070df34b7528a2f2021-03-03T20:56:00ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032019-01-01141e021110110.1371/journal.pone.0211101Low field magnetic resonance imaging of the equine distal interphalangeal joint: Comparison between weight-bearing and non-weight-bearing conditions.Laurence EvrardFabrice AudigiéLélia BertoniSandrine JacquetJean-Marie DenoixValeria BusoniThis descriptive study aimed to compare the magnetic resonance appearance of the distal interphalangeal joint articular cartilage between standing weight-bearing and non-weight-bearing conditions. Ten forefeet of live horses were scanned in a standing low-field magnetic resonance system (0.27 T). After euthanasia for reasons unrelated to the study, the non-weight-bearing isolated feet were scanned in a vertical positioning reproducing limb orientation in live horses. The same acquisition settings as during the weight-bearing examination were used. Thickness and cross-sectional area of the distal interphalangeal articular cartilage and joint space were measured on tridimensional T1-weighted gradient echo high resolution frontal and sagittal images at predetermined landmarks in both conditions and were compared using a linear mixed-effects model. Frontal images were randomized and submitted to 9 blinded readers with 3 different experience levels for identification of weight-bearing versus non-weight-bearing acquisitions based on cartilage appearance. Weight-bearing limbs had significantly thinner distal interphalangeal cartilage (p = 0.0001) than non-weight-bearing limbs. This change was greater in the distal phalanx cartilage than that of the middle phalanx. Blinded readers correctly identified 83% (range 65 to 95%) of the images as weight-bearing or non-weight-bearing acquisitions, with significantly different results observed among the different readers (p < 0.001) and groups (p < 0.001). These results indicate that distal interphalangeal articular cartilage and particularly cartilage of the distal phalanx thins when weight-bearing compared to the non-weight-bearing standing postmortem conditions and suggest that cartilage abnormalities may be more difficult to identify on weight-bearing standing magnetic resonance imaging.https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0211101 |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Laurence Evrard Fabrice Audigié Lélia Bertoni Sandrine Jacquet Jean-Marie Denoix Valeria Busoni |
spellingShingle |
Laurence Evrard Fabrice Audigié Lélia Bertoni Sandrine Jacquet Jean-Marie Denoix Valeria Busoni Low field magnetic resonance imaging of the equine distal interphalangeal joint: Comparison between weight-bearing and non-weight-bearing conditions. PLoS ONE |
author_facet |
Laurence Evrard Fabrice Audigié Lélia Bertoni Sandrine Jacquet Jean-Marie Denoix Valeria Busoni |
author_sort |
Laurence Evrard |
title |
Low field magnetic resonance imaging of the equine distal interphalangeal joint: Comparison between weight-bearing and non-weight-bearing conditions. |
title_short |
Low field magnetic resonance imaging of the equine distal interphalangeal joint: Comparison between weight-bearing and non-weight-bearing conditions. |
title_full |
Low field magnetic resonance imaging of the equine distal interphalangeal joint: Comparison between weight-bearing and non-weight-bearing conditions. |
title_fullStr |
Low field magnetic resonance imaging of the equine distal interphalangeal joint: Comparison between weight-bearing and non-weight-bearing conditions. |
title_full_unstemmed |
Low field magnetic resonance imaging of the equine distal interphalangeal joint: Comparison between weight-bearing and non-weight-bearing conditions. |
title_sort |
low field magnetic resonance imaging of the equine distal interphalangeal joint: comparison between weight-bearing and non-weight-bearing conditions. |
publisher |
Public Library of Science (PLoS) |
series |
PLoS ONE |
issn |
1932-6203 |
publishDate |
2019-01-01 |
description |
This descriptive study aimed to compare the magnetic resonance appearance of the distal interphalangeal joint articular cartilage between standing weight-bearing and non-weight-bearing conditions. Ten forefeet of live horses were scanned in a standing low-field magnetic resonance system (0.27 T). After euthanasia for reasons unrelated to the study, the non-weight-bearing isolated feet were scanned in a vertical positioning reproducing limb orientation in live horses. The same acquisition settings as during the weight-bearing examination were used. Thickness and cross-sectional area of the distal interphalangeal articular cartilage and joint space were measured on tridimensional T1-weighted gradient echo high resolution frontal and sagittal images at predetermined landmarks in both conditions and were compared using a linear mixed-effects model. Frontal images were randomized and submitted to 9 blinded readers with 3 different experience levels for identification of weight-bearing versus non-weight-bearing acquisitions based on cartilage appearance. Weight-bearing limbs had significantly thinner distal interphalangeal cartilage (p = 0.0001) than non-weight-bearing limbs. This change was greater in the distal phalanx cartilage than that of the middle phalanx. Blinded readers correctly identified 83% (range 65 to 95%) of the images as weight-bearing or non-weight-bearing acquisitions, with significantly different results observed among the different readers (p < 0.001) and groups (p < 0.001). These results indicate that distal interphalangeal articular cartilage and particularly cartilage of the distal phalanx thins when weight-bearing compared to the non-weight-bearing standing postmortem conditions and suggest that cartilage abnormalities may be more difficult to identify on weight-bearing standing magnetic resonance imaging. |
url |
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0211101 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT laurenceevrard lowfieldmagneticresonanceimagingoftheequinedistalinterphalangealjointcomparisonbetweenweightbearingandnonweightbearingconditions AT fabriceaudigie lowfieldmagneticresonanceimagingoftheequinedistalinterphalangealjointcomparisonbetweenweightbearingandnonweightbearingconditions AT leliabertoni lowfieldmagneticresonanceimagingoftheequinedistalinterphalangealjointcomparisonbetweenweightbearingandnonweightbearingconditions AT sandrinejacquet lowfieldmagneticresonanceimagingoftheequinedistalinterphalangealjointcomparisonbetweenweightbearingandnonweightbearingconditions AT jeanmariedenoix lowfieldmagneticresonanceimagingoftheequinedistalinterphalangealjointcomparisonbetweenweightbearingandnonweightbearingconditions AT valeriabusoni lowfieldmagneticresonanceimagingoftheequinedistalinterphalangealjointcomparisonbetweenweightbearingandnonweightbearingconditions |
_version_ |
1714819772099592192 |