Postavení územního systému ekologické stability v zelené infrastruktuře

Although the concept of Green Infrastructure (GI) has been promoted in the EU since 2010, its interpretation within the professional public remains inconsistent. One group sees it as the opportunity for human settlements to create a “green backbone” base to help improve water management and mitigate...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Darek Lacina
Format: Article
Language:slk
Published: Institute of Landscape Ecology of the Slovak Academy of Sciences 2018-03-01
Series:Životné prostredie
Subjects:
Online Access:http://147.213.211.222/sites/default/files/2018_1_019_022_Lacina.pdf
id doaj-6c1c316cd2d445ecb75a7aa79751e166
record_format Article
spelling doaj-6c1c316cd2d445ecb75a7aa79751e1662020-11-24T23:01:28ZslkInstitute of Landscape Ecology of the Slovak Academy of SciencesŽivotné prostredie0044-48632585-78002018-03-015211922Postavení územního systému ekologické stability v zelené infrastruktuřeDarek Lacina0Ústav plánování krajiny Zahradnické fakulty Mendelovy univerzity v Brně, Valtická 337, 691 44 Lednice, Česká republika; Ústav inženýrských staveb, tvorby a ochrany krajiny Lesnické a dřevařské fakulty Mendelovy univerzity v Brně, Zemědělská 3, 613 00 Brno, Česká republikaAlthough the concept of Green Infrastructure (GI) has been promoted in the EU since 2010, its interpretation within the professional public remains inconsistent. One group sees it as the opportunity for human settlements to create a “green backbone” base to help improve water management and mitigate the effects of ongoing climate change. Others, however, perceive GI in the narrower sense first instituted by the European Commission as a means of significantly improving the status of natural and nature-friendly ecosystems and the use of ecosystem services. In principle, agreement can be found in determining the mutual relationship between the Territorial Systems of Ecological Stability (TSES) and GI. Resolution is of utmost importance to the Czech Republic because TSES is clearly defined in Czech legislation and has quite clear methodology rules. We know precisely what we want from TSES and the tools we can use to achieve these goals. TSES is undoubtedly a subset of GI with very specific requirements for its form. This relationship is clearly demonstrated in our Šardice cadastral area example.http://147.213.211.222/sites/default/files/2018_1_019_022_Lacina.pdfEuropean CommissionCzech Chamber of Architectsecosystem servicespolyfunctionalitylanscapeecological networkŠardiceTSESGreen Infrastructure
collection DOAJ
language slk
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Darek Lacina
spellingShingle Darek Lacina
Postavení územního systému ekologické stability v zelené infrastruktuře
Životné prostredie
European Commission
Czech Chamber of Architects
ecosystem services
polyfunctionality
lanscape
ecological network
Šardice
TSES
Green Infrastructure
author_facet Darek Lacina
author_sort Darek Lacina
title Postavení územního systému ekologické stability v zelené infrastruktuře
title_short Postavení územního systému ekologické stability v zelené infrastruktuře
title_full Postavení územního systému ekologické stability v zelené infrastruktuře
title_fullStr Postavení územního systému ekologické stability v zelené infrastruktuře
title_full_unstemmed Postavení územního systému ekologické stability v zelené infrastruktuře
title_sort postavení územního systému ekologické stability v zelené infrastruktuře
publisher Institute of Landscape Ecology of the Slovak Academy of Sciences
series Životné prostredie
issn 0044-4863
2585-7800
publishDate 2018-03-01
description Although the concept of Green Infrastructure (GI) has been promoted in the EU since 2010, its interpretation within the professional public remains inconsistent. One group sees it as the opportunity for human settlements to create a “green backbone” base to help improve water management and mitigate the effects of ongoing climate change. Others, however, perceive GI in the narrower sense first instituted by the European Commission as a means of significantly improving the status of natural and nature-friendly ecosystems and the use of ecosystem services. In principle, agreement can be found in determining the mutual relationship between the Territorial Systems of Ecological Stability (TSES) and GI. Resolution is of utmost importance to the Czech Republic because TSES is clearly defined in Czech legislation and has quite clear methodology rules. We know precisely what we want from TSES and the tools we can use to achieve these goals. TSES is undoubtedly a subset of GI with very specific requirements for its form. This relationship is clearly demonstrated in our Šardice cadastral area example.
topic European Commission
Czech Chamber of Architects
ecosystem services
polyfunctionality
lanscape
ecological network
Šardice
TSES
Green Infrastructure
url http://147.213.211.222/sites/default/files/2018_1_019_022_Lacina.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT dareklacina postaveniuzemnihosystemuekologickestabilityvzeleneinfrastrukture
_version_ 1725639403351572480