DNH 109: A fragmentary hominin near-proximal ulna from Drimolen, South Africa

We describe a fragmentary, yet significant, diminutive proximal ulna (DNH 109) from the Lower Pleistocene deposits of Drimolen, Republic of South Africa. On the basis of observable morphology and available comparative metrics, DNH 109 is definitively hominin and is the smallest African Plio-Pleistoc...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Andrew Gallagher, Colin Menter
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Academy of Science of South Africa 2011-05-01
Series:South African Journal of Science
Subjects:
Online Access:http://192.168.0.115/index.php/sajs/article/view/9849
id doaj-6c1b116edaec4c7dbc969ffaca800c4a
record_format Article
spelling doaj-6c1b116edaec4c7dbc969ffaca800c4a2021-04-03T15:46:29ZengAcademy of Science of South AfricaSouth African Journal of Science1996-74892011-05-011075/6DNH 109: A fragmentary hominin near-proximal ulna from Drimolen, South AfricaAndrew Gallagher0Colin Menter1Department of Anthropology and Development Studies, University of JohannesburgDepartment of Anthropology and Development Studies, University of JohannesburgWe describe a fragmentary, yet significant, diminutive proximal ulna (DNH 109) from the Lower Pleistocene deposits of Drimolen, Republic of South Africa. On the basis of observable morphology and available comparative metrics, DNH 109 is definitively hominin and is the smallest African Plio-Pleistocene australopith ulna yet recovered. Mediolateral and anteroposterior dimensions of the proximal diaphysis immediately distal to the m. brachialis sulcus in DNH 109 yield an elliptical area (Ï€/4 *m-l*a-p) that is smaller than the A.L. 333-38 Australopithecus afarensis subadult from Hadar. Given the unusually broad mediolateral/anteroposterior diaphyseal proportions distal to the brachialis sulcus, the osseous development of the medial and lateral borders of the sulcus, and the overall size of the specimen relative to comparative infant, juvenile, subadult and adult comparative hominid ulnae (Gorilla, Pan and Homo), it is probable that DNH 109 samples an australopith of probable juvenile age at death. As a result of the fragmentary state of preservation and absence of association with taxonomically diagnostic craniodental remains, DNH 109 cannot be provisionally assigned to any particular hominin genus (Paranthropus or Homo) at present. Nonetheless, DNH 109 increases our known sample of available Plio-Pleistocene subadult early hominin postcrania.http://192.168.0.115/index.php/sajs/article/view/9849DrimolenP. robustusPlio-Pleistocene homininsproximal ulnapostcranial
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Andrew Gallagher
Colin Menter
spellingShingle Andrew Gallagher
Colin Menter
DNH 109: A fragmentary hominin near-proximal ulna from Drimolen, South Africa
South African Journal of Science
Drimolen
P. robustus
Plio-Pleistocene hominins
proximal ulna
postcranial
author_facet Andrew Gallagher
Colin Menter
author_sort Andrew Gallagher
title DNH 109: A fragmentary hominin near-proximal ulna from Drimolen, South Africa
title_short DNH 109: A fragmentary hominin near-proximal ulna from Drimolen, South Africa
title_full DNH 109: A fragmentary hominin near-proximal ulna from Drimolen, South Africa
title_fullStr DNH 109: A fragmentary hominin near-proximal ulna from Drimolen, South Africa
title_full_unstemmed DNH 109: A fragmentary hominin near-proximal ulna from Drimolen, South Africa
title_sort dnh 109: a fragmentary hominin near-proximal ulna from drimolen, south africa
publisher Academy of Science of South Africa
series South African Journal of Science
issn 1996-7489
publishDate 2011-05-01
description We describe a fragmentary, yet significant, diminutive proximal ulna (DNH 109) from the Lower Pleistocene deposits of Drimolen, Republic of South Africa. On the basis of observable morphology and available comparative metrics, DNH 109 is definitively hominin and is the smallest African Plio-Pleistocene australopith ulna yet recovered. Mediolateral and anteroposterior dimensions of the proximal diaphysis immediately distal to the m. brachialis sulcus in DNH 109 yield an elliptical area (Ï€/4 *m-l*a-p) that is smaller than the A.L. 333-38 Australopithecus afarensis subadult from Hadar. Given the unusually broad mediolateral/anteroposterior diaphyseal proportions distal to the brachialis sulcus, the osseous development of the medial and lateral borders of the sulcus, and the overall size of the specimen relative to comparative infant, juvenile, subadult and adult comparative hominid ulnae (Gorilla, Pan and Homo), it is probable that DNH 109 samples an australopith of probable juvenile age at death. As a result of the fragmentary state of preservation and absence of association with taxonomically diagnostic craniodental remains, DNH 109 cannot be provisionally assigned to any particular hominin genus (Paranthropus or Homo) at present. Nonetheless, DNH 109 increases our known sample of available Plio-Pleistocene subadult early hominin postcrania.
topic Drimolen
P. robustus
Plio-Pleistocene hominins
proximal ulna
postcranial
url http://192.168.0.115/index.php/sajs/article/view/9849
work_keys_str_mv AT andrewgallagher dnh109afragmentaryhomininnearproximalulnafromdrimolensouthafrica
AT colinmenter dnh109afragmentaryhomininnearproximalulnafromdrimolensouthafrica
_version_ 1721543919018180608