Acarbose-metformin is more effective in glycemic variability control than repaglinide-metformin in T2DM patients inadequately controlled with metformin: a retrospective cohort study

Background Acarbose and repaglinide are widely used either by themselves or in combination with other medications. However, their efficacy in diabetes control has not been compared when used in combination with metformin. Methods The present study aimed to compare their effects on glycemic variabili...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Guoli Du, Wanrun Xie, Yinxia Su, Yao Ma, Xiaoming Gao, Sheng Jiang, Huazheng Liang
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: PeerJ Inc. 2020-10-01
Series:PeerJ
Subjects:
Online Access:https://peerj.com/articles/9905.pdf
id doaj-6bedb3d41d71478188893dca7788b811
record_format Article
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Guoli Du
Wanrun Xie
Yinxia Su
Yao Ma
Xiaoming Gao
Sheng Jiang
Huazheng Liang
spellingShingle Guoli Du
Wanrun Xie
Yinxia Su
Yao Ma
Xiaoming Gao
Sheng Jiang
Huazheng Liang
Acarbose-metformin is more effective in glycemic variability control than repaglinide-metformin in T2DM patients inadequately controlled with metformin: a retrospective cohort study
PeerJ
Diabetes mellitus
Metformin
Acarbose
Repaglinide
Glucose variability
author_facet Guoli Du
Wanrun Xie
Yinxia Su
Yao Ma
Xiaoming Gao
Sheng Jiang
Huazheng Liang
author_sort Guoli Du
title Acarbose-metformin is more effective in glycemic variability control than repaglinide-metformin in T2DM patients inadequately controlled with metformin: a retrospective cohort study
title_short Acarbose-metformin is more effective in glycemic variability control than repaglinide-metformin in T2DM patients inadequately controlled with metformin: a retrospective cohort study
title_full Acarbose-metformin is more effective in glycemic variability control than repaglinide-metformin in T2DM patients inadequately controlled with metformin: a retrospective cohort study
title_fullStr Acarbose-metformin is more effective in glycemic variability control than repaglinide-metformin in T2DM patients inadequately controlled with metformin: a retrospective cohort study
title_full_unstemmed Acarbose-metformin is more effective in glycemic variability control than repaglinide-metformin in T2DM patients inadequately controlled with metformin: a retrospective cohort study
title_sort acarbose-metformin is more effective in glycemic variability control than repaglinide-metformin in t2dm patients inadequately controlled with metformin: a retrospective cohort study
publisher PeerJ Inc.
series PeerJ
issn 2167-8359
publishDate 2020-10-01
description Background Acarbose and repaglinide are widely used either by themselves or in combination with other medications. However, their efficacy in diabetes control has not been compared when used in combination with metformin. Methods The present study aimed to compare their effects on glycemic variability (GV) control when taken with metformin for type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) inadequately controlled with metformin alone. In this retrospective cohort study, T2DM patients who were treated with either acarbose-metformin or repaglinide-metformin combination were recruited. Either acarbose 100 mg or repaglinide 2 mg triple daily was taken for the subsequent 12 weeks in combination with metformin. Demographic data, biochemical data and 7-point glycemic self-monitoring conducted with capillary blood (SMBG) data were reviewed after one week and 12 weeks. The primary outcome including glucose control and changes in GV as well as other factors affecting GV and the incidence of hypoglycemia were also analyzed. Results Of the 305 T2DM patients enrolled, data from 273 subjects, 136 in the acarbose-metformin group (M+A) and 137 in the repaglinide-metformin group (M+R) were analyzed. Both regimens improved glycemic control at 12 weeks post commencement of new medications. GV, expressed as the mean amplitude of plasma glycemic excursions (MAGE, 5.0 ± 2.6 vs. 2.8 ± 1.6 mmol/L, p < 0.001 in M+A; 5.1 ± 2.5 vs. 2.9 ± 1.3 mmol/L, p < 0.001 in M+R), standard deviation of blood glucose (SDBG, 3.6 ± 1.3 vs. 2.0 ± 0.9 mmol/L, p < 0.001 in M+A; 3.7 ± 1.3 vs. 2.4 ± 1.3 p < 0.001 in M+R), coefficient of variation of blood glucose (CVBG, (0.30 ± 0.09 vs. 0.21 ± 0.1, p < 0.001 in M+A; 0.31 ± 0.09 vs. 0.24 ± 0.12, p < 0.001 in M+R), postprandial amplitude of glycemic excursions (PPGE, 5.2 ± 2.6 vs. 2.8 ± 1.6 mmol/L, p < 0.001 in M+A; 5.3 ± 2.5 vs. 2.9 ± 1.3 mmol/L, p < 0.001 in M+R) or largest amplitude of glycemic excursions (LAGE, 9.8 ± 3.6 vs. 5.4 ± 2.4 mmol/L, p < 0.001 in M+A; 10.1 ± 3.4 vs. 6.3 ± 3.2 mmol/L, p < 0.001 in M+R) decreased significantly after the addition of acarbose or repaglinide (p < 0.05 respectively). Compared with repaglinide-metformin, acarbose-metformin was more effective in GV control at 12 weeks post commencement of new medications (p < 0.05). This study indicates that both acarbose-metformin and repaglinide-metformin combinations could effectively reduce GV and the acarbose-metformin combination seems to be more effective than the repaglinide-metformin combination. However, this conclusion should be confirmed by future large-scaled and more comprehensive studies due to the limitations of the present study.
topic Diabetes mellitus
Metformin
Acarbose
Repaglinide
Glucose variability
url https://peerj.com/articles/9905.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT guolidu acarbosemetforminismoreeffectiveinglycemicvariabilitycontrolthanrepaglinidemetforminint2dmpatientsinadequatelycontrolledwithmetforminaretrospectivecohortstudy
AT wanrunxie acarbosemetforminismoreeffectiveinglycemicvariabilitycontrolthanrepaglinidemetforminint2dmpatientsinadequatelycontrolledwithmetforminaretrospectivecohortstudy
AT yinxiasu acarbosemetforminismoreeffectiveinglycemicvariabilitycontrolthanrepaglinidemetforminint2dmpatientsinadequatelycontrolledwithmetforminaretrospectivecohortstudy
AT yaoma acarbosemetforminismoreeffectiveinglycemicvariabilitycontrolthanrepaglinidemetforminint2dmpatientsinadequatelycontrolledwithmetforminaretrospectivecohortstudy
AT xiaominggao acarbosemetforminismoreeffectiveinglycemicvariabilitycontrolthanrepaglinidemetforminint2dmpatientsinadequatelycontrolledwithmetforminaretrospectivecohortstudy
AT shengjiang acarbosemetforminismoreeffectiveinglycemicvariabilitycontrolthanrepaglinidemetforminint2dmpatientsinadequatelycontrolledwithmetforminaretrospectivecohortstudy
AT huazhengliang acarbosemetforminismoreeffectiveinglycemicvariabilitycontrolthanrepaglinidemetforminint2dmpatientsinadequatelycontrolledwithmetforminaretrospectivecohortstudy
_version_ 1724531613454303232
spelling doaj-6bedb3d41d71478188893dca7788b8112020-11-25T03:41:07ZengPeerJ Inc.PeerJ2167-83592020-10-018e990510.7717/peerj.9905Acarbose-metformin is more effective in glycemic variability control than repaglinide-metformin in T2DM patients inadequately controlled with metformin: a retrospective cohort studyGuoli Du0Wanrun Xie1Yinxia Su2Yao Ma3Xiaoming Gao4Sheng Jiang5Huazheng Liang6Department of Endocrinology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University, Urumuqi, Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region, ChinaDepartment of Endocrinology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University, Urumuqi, Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region, ChinaHealth Management Center, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University, Urumuqi, Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region, ChinaDepartment of Endocrinology, The Second Mercy Hospital of Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region, Urumuqi, Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region, ChinaDepartment of Cardiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University, Urumuqi, Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region, ChinaDepartment of Endocrinology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University, Urumuqi, Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region, ChinaDepartment of Neurology, Translational Research Institute of Brain and Brain-like Intelligence, Shanghai Fourth People’s Hospital Affiliated toTongji University, Shanghai, ChinaBackground Acarbose and repaglinide are widely used either by themselves or in combination with other medications. However, their efficacy in diabetes control has not been compared when used in combination with metformin. Methods The present study aimed to compare their effects on glycemic variability (GV) control when taken with metformin for type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) inadequately controlled with metformin alone. In this retrospective cohort study, T2DM patients who were treated with either acarbose-metformin or repaglinide-metformin combination were recruited. Either acarbose 100 mg or repaglinide 2 mg triple daily was taken for the subsequent 12 weeks in combination with metformin. Demographic data, biochemical data and 7-point glycemic self-monitoring conducted with capillary blood (SMBG) data were reviewed after one week and 12 weeks. The primary outcome including glucose control and changes in GV as well as other factors affecting GV and the incidence of hypoglycemia were also analyzed. Results Of the 305 T2DM patients enrolled, data from 273 subjects, 136 in the acarbose-metformin group (M+A) and 137 in the repaglinide-metformin group (M+R) were analyzed. Both regimens improved glycemic control at 12 weeks post commencement of new medications. GV, expressed as the mean amplitude of plasma glycemic excursions (MAGE, 5.0 ± 2.6 vs. 2.8 ± 1.6 mmol/L, p < 0.001 in M+A; 5.1 ± 2.5 vs. 2.9 ± 1.3 mmol/L, p < 0.001 in M+R), standard deviation of blood glucose (SDBG, 3.6 ± 1.3 vs. 2.0 ± 0.9 mmol/L, p < 0.001 in M+A; 3.7 ± 1.3 vs. 2.4 ± 1.3 p < 0.001 in M+R), coefficient of variation of blood glucose (CVBG, (0.30 ± 0.09 vs. 0.21 ± 0.1, p < 0.001 in M+A; 0.31 ± 0.09 vs. 0.24 ± 0.12, p < 0.001 in M+R), postprandial amplitude of glycemic excursions (PPGE, 5.2 ± 2.6 vs. 2.8 ± 1.6 mmol/L, p < 0.001 in M+A; 5.3 ± 2.5 vs. 2.9 ± 1.3 mmol/L, p < 0.001 in M+R) or largest amplitude of glycemic excursions (LAGE, 9.8 ± 3.6 vs. 5.4 ± 2.4 mmol/L, p < 0.001 in M+A; 10.1 ± 3.4 vs. 6.3 ± 3.2 mmol/L, p < 0.001 in M+R) decreased significantly after the addition of acarbose or repaglinide (p < 0.05 respectively). Compared with repaglinide-metformin, acarbose-metformin was more effective in GV control at 12 weeks post commencement of new medications (p < 0.05). This study indicates that both acarbose-metformin and repaglinide-metformin combinations could effectively reduce GV and the acarbose-metformin combination seems to be more effective than the repaglinide-metformin combination. However, this conclusion should be confirmed by future large-scaled and more comprehensive studies due to the limitations of the present study.https://peerj.com/articles/9905.pdfDiabetes mellitusMetforminAcarboseRepaglinideGlucose variability