Comparison of visual acuity, refractive outcomes, and satisfaction between LASIK performed with a microkeratome and a femto laser

Sharif Hashmani,1 Nauman Hashmani,1 Hina Rajani,2 Priyanka Ramesh,2 Junaid Ahmed Soomro,2 Syed Rashid Hussain Shah,2 Jaish Kumar,2 Sayed Mustafa Mahmood Shah2 1Department of Ophthalmology, Hashmanis Hospital, Karachi, Pakistan; 2Dow Medical College, Karachi, Pakistan Purpose: To compare refractive...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Hashmani S, Hashmani N, Rajani H, Ramesh P, Soomro JA, Hussain Shah SR, Kumar J, Mahmood Shah SM
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Dove Medical Press 2017-05-01
Series:Clinical Ophthalmology
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.dovepress.com/comparison-of-visual-acuity-refractive-outcomes-and-satisfaction-betwe-peer-reviewed-article-OPTH
id doaj-6be930a5308c41329bdbe0724e7aa94a
record_format Article
spelling doaj-6be930a5308c41329bdbe0724e7aa94a2020-11-24T23:40:21ZengDove Medical PressClinical Ophthalmology1177-54832017-05-01Volume 111009101432999Comparison of visual acuity, refractive outcomes, and satisfaction between LASIK performed with a microkeratome and a femto laserHashmani SHashmani NRajani HRamesh PSoomro JAHussain Shah SRKumar JMahmood Shah SMSharif Hashmani,1 Nauman Hashmani,1 Hina Rajani,2 Priyanka Ramesh,2 Junaid Ahmed Soomro,2 Syed Rashid Hussain Shah,2 Jaish Kumar,2 Sayed Mustafa Mahmood Shah2 1Department of Ophthalmology, Hashmanis Hospital, Karachi, Pakistan; 2Dow Medical College, Karachi, Pakistan Purpose: To compare refractive outcomes, visual acuities, and satisfaction of patients between those treated with laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) using a Hansatome microkeratome (HM) and femto-assisted laser (FAL).Methods: This was a retrospective analysis of 1,366 eyes in 687 patients who underwent LASIK with an HM (n=1,137) and an FAL (n=229) at the two centers of Hashmanis Hospital, Karachi, Pakistan. Refractive outcomes, including sphere, cylinder, and spherical equivalent in diopters (D), and visual acuities were assessed both preoperatively and at 1 month follow-up. Patient satisfaction was gauged by contacting the patient at the time of chart review.Results: The postoperative median sphere, cylinder, and spherical equivalent values for those treated with FAL were 0.3±0.7 (-5.5–1.8), -0.5±0.6 (-5.0–1.0), and 0.0±0.7 (-6.0–1.6), respectively. For the HM arm, they were 0.0±1.28 (-10.8–6.8), -0.5±0.5 (-4.5–1.5), and -0.3±1.3 (-11.6–6.8), respectively. All preoperative values were statistically insignificant between the groups, while postoperative values were significant with P-values <0.001. Predictability and efficacy index was higher for the FAL (92.1%, 1.00) than the HM group (82.2%, 0.84). Similarly, patient satisfaction was slightly higher for those treated with FAL (93.3%) than HM (91.4%).Conclusion: Our large retrospective analysis of eyes that have undergone LASIK using HM and FAL shows superior refractive outcomes in the latter, with special regard to procedural efficacy and predictability. Keywords: laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis, femtosecond, microkeratome, cornea, refractive surgeryhttps://www.dovepress.com/comparison-of-visual-acuity-refractive-outcomes-and-satisfaction-betwe-peer-reviewed-article-OPTHLASIKFemtosecondMicrokeratomeCorneaRefractive surgery
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Hashmani S
Hashmani N
Rajani H
Ramesh P
Soomro JA
Hussain Shah SR
Kumar J
Mahmood Shah SM
spellingShingle Hashmani S
Hashmani N
Rajani H
Ramesh P
Soomro JA
Hussain Shah SR
Kumar J
Mahmood Shah SM
Comparison of visual acuity, refractive outcomes, and satisfaction between LASIK performed with a microkeratome and a femto laser
Clinical Ophthalmology
LASIK
Femtosecond
Microkeratome
Cornea
Refractive surgery
author_facet Hashmani S
Hashmani N
Rajani H
Ramesh P
Soomro JA
Hussain Shah SR
Kumar J
Mahmood Shah SM
author_sort Hashmani S
title Comparison of visual acuity, refractive outcomes, and satisfaction between LASIK performed with a microkeratome and a femto laser
title_short Comparison of visual acuity, refractive outcomes, and satisfaction between LASIK performed with a microkeratome and a femto laser
title_full Comparison of visual acuity, refractive outcomes, and satisfaction between LASIK performed with a microkeratome and a femto laser
title_fullStr Comparison of visual acuity, refractive outcomes, and satisfaction between LASIK performed with a microkeratome and a femto laser
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of visual acuity, refractive outcomes, and satisfaction between LASIK performed with a microkeratome and a femto laser
title_sort comparison of visual acuity, refractive outcomes, and satisfaction between lasik performed with a microkeratome and a femto laser
publisher Dove Medical Press
series Clinical Ophthalmology
issn 1177-5483
publishDate 2017-05-01
description Sharif Hashmani,1 Nauman Hashmani,1 Hina Rajani,2 Priyanka Ramesh,2 Junaid Ahmed Soomro,2 Syed Rashid Hussain Shah,2 Jaish Kumar,2 Sayed Mustafa Mahmood Shah2 1Department of Ophthalmology, Hashmanis Hospital, Karachi, Pakistan; 2Dow Medical College, Karachi, Pakistan Purpose: To compare refractive outcomes, visual acuities, and satisfaction of patients between those treated with laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) using a Hansatome microkeratome (HM) and femto-assisted laser (FAL).Methods: This was a retrospective analysis of 1,366 eyes in 687 patients who underwent LASIK with an HM (n=1,137) and an FAL (n=229) at the two centers of Hashmanis Hospital, Karachi, Pakistan. Refractive outcomes, including sphere, cylinder, and spherical equivalent in diopters (D), and visual acuities were assessed both preoperatively and at 1 month follow-up. Patient satisfaction was gauged by contacting the patient at the time of chart review.Results: The postoperative median sphere, cylinder, and spherical equivalent values for those treated with FAL were 0.3±0.7 (-5.5–1.8), -0.5±0.6 (-5.0–1.0), and 0.0±0.7 (-6.0–1.6), respectively. For the HM arm, they were 0.0±1.28 (-10.8–6.8), -0.5±0.5 (-4.5–1.5), and -0.3±1.3 (-11.6–6.8), respectively. All preoperative values were statistically insignificant between the groups, while postoperative values were significant with P-values <0.001. Predictability and efficacy index was higher for the FAL (92.1%, 1.00) than the HM group (82.2%, 0.84). Similarly, patient satisfaction was slightly higher for those treated with FAL (93.3%) than HM (91.4%).Conclusion: Our large retrospective analysis of eyes that have undergone LASIK using HM and FAL shows superior refractive outcomes in the latter, with special regard to procedural efficacy and predictability. Keywords: laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis, femtosecond, microkeratome, cornea, refractive surgery
topic LASIK
Femtosecond
Microkeratome
Cornea
Refractive surgery
url https://www.dovepress.com/comparison-of-visual-acuity-refractive-outcomes-and-satisfaction-betwe-peer-reviewed-article-OPTH
work_keys_str_mv AT hashmanis comparisonofvisualacuityrefractiveoutcomesandsatisfactionbetweenlasikperformedwithamicrokeratomeandafemtolaser
AT hashmanin comparisonofvisualacuityrefractiveoutcomesandsatisfactionbetweenlasikperformedwithamicrokeratomeandafemtolaser
AT rajanih comparisonofvisualacuityrefractiveoutcomesandsatisfactionbetweenlasikperformedwithamicrokeratomeandafemtolaser
AT rameshp comparisonofvisualacuityrefractiveoutcomesandsatisfactionbetweenlasikperformedwithamicrokeratomeandafemtolaser
AT soomroja comparisonofvisualacuityrefractiveoutcomesandsatisfactionbetweenlasikperformedwithamicrokeratomeandafemtolaser
AT hussainshahsr comparisonofvisualacuityrefractiveoutcomesandsatisfactionbetweenlasikperformedwithamicrokeratomeandafemtolaser
AT kumarj comparisonofvisualacuityrefractiveoutcomesandsatisfactionbetweenlasikperformedwithamicrokeratomeandafemtolaser
AT mahmoodshahsm comparisonofvisualacuityrefractiveoutcomesandsatisfactionbetweenlasikperformedwithamicrokeratomeandafemtolaser
_version_ 1725509889917190144