Modelos de maturidade em gerenciamento de projetos: uma análise comparativa

Maturity in project management has become a critical factor for organizations that develop projects and want to stand out in the marketplace in which they operate. In this context, the literature shows several models for assessing organizational maturity in project management, f...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Rafael Rodrigues da Silva, Enilson Medeiros dos Santos
Format: Article
Language:Portuguese
Published: Universidade Nove de Julho 2016-01-01
Series:Exacta
Online Access:http://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=81047687010
id doaj-6bdb887b87114849b609407635a75985
record_format Article
spelling doaj-6bdb887b87114849b609407635a759852020-11-24T21:39:53ZporUniversidade Nove de JulhoExacta1678-54281983-93082016-01-01143467476Modelos de maturidade em gerenciamento de projetos: uma análise comparativaRafael Rodrigues da SilvaEnilson Medeiros dos SantosMaturity in project management has become a critical factor for organizations that develop projects and want to stand out in the marketplace in which they operate. In this context, the literature shows several models for assessing organizational maturity in project management, furnishing paths for allowing the institutionalization of project management to progressively achieve superior levels of excellence. This paper attempts to comparatively analyze four of these models on the basis of an analytical matrix elaborated through a mixed methodological procedure. A theoretical investigation on the core structure of the models was combined with an in-depth review of previous studies, including conceptual and empirical types. The analytical matrix used in this paper is derived from the implicit structure of the models and from documented information regarding theoretical and empirical analysis of their application in field situations. Our conclusions indicate that the Prado-MMGP and PMMM models obtained a better evaluation than the other models considered in the study; nevertheless, they also indicate the need for further comparative analyses, especially concerning the improvement of the analytical matrix.http://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=81047687010
collection DOAJ
language Portuguese
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Rafael Rodrigues da Silva
Enilson Medeiros dos Santos
spellingShingle Rafael Rodrigues da Silva
Enilson Medeiros dos Santos
Modelos de maturidade em gerenciamento de projetos: uma análise comparativa
Exacta
author_facet Rafael Rodrigues da Silva
Enilson Medeiros dos Santos
author_sort Rafael Rodrigues da Silva
title Modelos de maturidade em gerenciamento de projetos: uma análise comparativa
title_short Modelos de maturidade em gerenciamento de projetos: uma análise comparativa
title_full Modelos de maturidade em gerenciamento de projetos: uma análise comparativa
title_fullStr Modelos de maturidade em gerenciamento de projetos: uma análise comparativa
title_full_unstemmed Modelos de maturidade em gerenciamento de projetos: uma análise comparativa
title_sort modelos de maturidade em gerenciamento de projetos: uma análise comparativa
publisher Universidade Nove de Julho
series Exacta
issn 1678-5428
1983-9308
publishDate 2016-01-01
description Maturity in project management has become a critical factor for organizations that develop projects and want to stand out in the marketplace in which they operate. In this context, the literature shows several models for assessing organizational maturity in project management, furnishing paths for allowing the institutionalization of project management to progressively achieve superior levels of excellence. This paper attempts to comparatively analyze four of these models on the basis of an analytical matrix elaborated through a mixed methodological procedure. A theoretical investigation on the core structure of the models was combined with an in-depth review of previous studies, including conceptual and empirical types. The analytical matrix used in this paper is derived from the implicit structure of the models and from documented information regarding theoretical and empirical analysis of their application in field situations. Our conclusions indicate that the Prado-MMGP and PMMM models obtained a better evaluation than the other models considered in the study; nevertheless, they also indicate the need for further comparative analyses, especially concerning the improvement of the analytical matrix.
url http://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=81047687010
work_keys_str_mv AT rafaelrodriguesdasilva modelosdematuridadeemgerenciamentodeprojetosumaanalisecomparativa
AT enilsonmedeirosdossantos modelosdematuridadeemgerenciamentodeprojetosumaanalisecomparativa
_version_ 1725928642322628608