Modelos de maturidade em gerenciamento de projetos: uma análise comparativa
Maturity in project management has become a critical factor for organizations that develop projects and want to stand out in the marketplace in which they operate. In this context, the literature shows several models for assessing organizational maturity in project management, f...
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | Portuguese |
Published: |
Universidade Nove de Julho
2016-01-01
|
Series: | Exacta |
Online Access: | http://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=81047687010 |
id |
doaj-6bdb887b87114849b609407635a75985 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-6bdb887b87114849b609407635a759852020-11-24T21:39:53ZporUniversidade Nove de JulhoExacta1678-54281983-93082016-01-01143467476Modelos de maturidade em gerenciamento de projetos: uma análise comparativaRafael Rodrigues da SilvaEnilson Medeiros dos SantosMaturity in project management has become a critical factor for organizations that develop projects and want to stand out in the marketplace in which they operate. In this context, the literature shows several models for assessing organizational maturity in project management, furnishing paths for allowing the institutionalization of project management to progressively achieve superior levels of excellence. This paper attempts to comparatively analyze four of these models on the basis of an analytical matrix elaborated through a mixed methodological procedure. A theoretical investigation on the core structure of the models was combined with an in-depth review of previous studies, including conceptual and empirical types. The analytical matrix used in this paper is derived from the implicit structure of the models and from documented information regarding theoretical and empirical analysis of their application in field situations. Our conclusions indicate that the Prado-MMGP and PMMM models obtained a better evaluation than the other models considered in the study; nevertheless, they also indicate the need for further comparative analyses, especially concerning the improvement of the analytical matrix.http://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=81047687010 |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
Portuguese |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Rafael Rodrigues da Silva Enilson Medeiros dos Santos |
spellingShingle |
Rafael Rodrigues da Silva Enilson Medeiros dos Santos Modelos de maturidade em gerenciamento de projetos: uma análise comparativa Exacta |
author_facet |
Rafael Rodrigues da Silva Enilson Medeiros dos Santos |
author_sort |
Rafael Rodrigues da Silva |
title |
Modelos de maturidade em gerenciamento de projetos: uma análise comparativa |
title_short |
Modelos de maturidade em gerenciamento de projetos: uma análise comparativa |
title_full |
Modelos de maturidade em gerenciamento de projetos: uma análise comparativa |
title_fullStr |
Modelos de maturidade em gerenciamento de projetos: uma análise comparativa |
title_full_unstemmed |
Modelos de maturidade em gerenciamento de projetos: uma análise comparativa |
title_sort |
modelos de maturidade em gerenciamento de projetos: uma análise comparativa |
publisher |
Universidade Nove de Julho |
series |
Exacta |
issn |
1678-5428 1983-9308 |
publishDate |
2016-01-01 |
description |
Maturity in project management has become a critical factor for organizations that develop projects and want to stand out in the marketplace in which they operate. In this context, the literature shows several models for assessing organizational maturity in project management, furnishing paths for allowing the institutionalization of project management to progressively achieve superior levels of excellence. This paper attempts to comparatively analyze four of these models on the basis of an analytical matrix elaborated through a mixed methodological procedure. A theoretical investigation on the core structure of the models was combined with an in-depth review of previous studies, including conceptual and empirical types. The analytical matrix used in this paper is derived from the implicit structure of the models and from documented information regarding theoretical and empirical analysis of their application in field situations. Our conclusions indicate that the Prado-MMGP and PMMM models obtained a better evaluation than the other models considered in the study; nevertheless, they also indicate the need for further comparative analyses, especially concerning the improvement of the analytical matrix. |
url |
http://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=81047687010 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT rafaelrodriguesdasilva modelosdematuridadeemgerenciamentodeprojetosumaanalisecomparativa AT enilsonmedeirosdossantos modelosdematuridadeemgerenciamentodeprojetosumaanalisecomparativa |
_version_ |
1725928642322628608 |