Comparison of finishing and polishing systems for residual resin removal after debonding

OBJECTIVE : The aim of this study was to evaluate (1) the effectiveness of one-step polishers on the surface morphology of enamel using scanning electron microscope (SEM) and compare their effects with conventional systems for residual adhesive removal; and (2) the time spent to remove resin remnant...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Çaöry Ulusoy
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: University of São Paulo 2009-06-01
Series:Journal of Applied Oral Science
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1678-77572009000300015
id doaj-6bd6a52997054329ae41a5df197611a7
record_format Article
spelling doaj-6bd6a52997054329ae41a5df197611a72020-11-24T23:50:01ZengUniversity of São PauloJournal of Applied Oral Science1678-77571678-77652009-06-0117320921510.1590/S1678-77572009000300015Comparison of finishing and polishing systems for residual resin removal after debondingÇaöry UlusoyOBJECTIVE : The aim of this study was to evaluate (1) the effectiveness of one-step polishers on the surface morphology of enamel using scanning electron microscope (SEM) and compare their effects with conventional systems for residual adhesive removal; and (2) the time spent to remove resin remnants. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Metal brackets were bonded to the buccal surface of 80 freshly extracted human premolar teeth and received the same resin-removal methods to evaluate the time spent to remove resin remnants (n=10). The brackets were debonded and residual adhesive was removed using different systems. Fourty-five premolars, including the control group with intact enamel (n=5), were examined by SEM. RESULTS: 30-blade tungsten carbide burs were the least time-consuming procedure. The best system in SEM study was the PoGo micro-polishers followed by Super-Snap Rainbow system. CONCLUSIONS: The effect of polishing systems on residual resin removal was dependent on the characteristics of the instruments in each system.http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1678-77572009000300015Scanning electron microscopyOrthodontic bracket debondingDental polishing
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Çaöry Ulusoy
spellingShingle Çaöry Ulusoy
Comparison of finishing and polishing systems for residual resin removal after debonding
Journal of Applied Oral Science
Scanning electron microscopy
Orthodontic bracket debonding
Dental polishing
author_facet Çaöry Ulusoy
author_sort Çaöry Ulusoy
title Comparison of finishing and polishing systems for residual resin removal after debonding
title_short Comparison of finishing and polishing systems for residual resin removal after debonding
title_full Comparison of finishing and polishing systems for residual resin removal after debonding
title_fullStr Comparison of finishing and polishing systems for residual resin removal after debonding
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of finishing and polishing systems for residual resin removal after debonding
title_sort comparison of finishing and polishing systems for residual resin removal after debonding
publisher University of São Paulo
series Journal of Applied Oral Science
issn 1678-7757
1678-7765
publishDate 2009-06-01
description OBJECTIVE : The aim of this study was to evaluate (1) the effectiveness of one-step polishers on the surface morphology of enamel using scanning electron microscope (SEM) and compare their effects with conventional systems for residual adhesive removal; and (2) the time spent to remove resin remnants. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Metal brackets were bonded to the buccal surface of 80 freshly extracted human premolar teeth and received the same resin-removal methods to evaluate the time spent to remove resin remnants (n=10). The brackets were debonded and residual adhesive was removed using different systems. Fourty-five premolars, including the control group with intact enamel (n=5), were examined by SEM. RESULTS: 30-blade tungsten carbide burs were the least time-consuming procedure. The best system in SEM study was the PoGo micro-polishers followed by Super-Snap Rainbow system. CONCLUSIONS: The effect of polishing systems on residual resin removal was dependent on the characteristics of the instruments in each system.
topic Scanning electron microscopy
Orthodontic bracket debonding
Dental polishing
url http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1678-77572009000300015
work_keys_str_mv AT caoryulusoy comparisonoffinishingandpolishingsystemsforresidualresinremovalafterdebonding
_version_ 1725480341832990720