Building the injury field in North America: the perspective of some of the pioneers
Abstract Background After the publication in 1985 of Injury in America and the establishment of an injury center at the Centers for Disease Control, there was a concerted attempt to create an “injury field.” Main body Thirty-six (36) pioneers in the injury prevention field responded to questions abo...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
BMC
2018-12-01
|
Series: | Injury Epidemiology |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s40621-018-0177-4 |
id |
doaj-6bce080a71c44b9b8ecf415e4225b198 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-6bce080a71c44b9b8ecf415e4225b1982020-11-25T02:23:00ZengBMCInjury Epidemiology2197-17142018-12-01511610.1186/s40621-018-0177-4Building the injury field in North America: the perspective of some of the pioneersDavid Hemenway0Harvard TH Chan School of Public HealthAbstract Background After the publication in 1985 of Injury in America and the establishment of an injury center at the Centers for Disease Control, there was a concerted attempt to create an “injury field.” Main body Thirty-six (36) pioneers in the injury prevention field responded to questions about the major accomplishments and failures of their profession since the publication of the seminal Institute of Medicine report Injury in America in 1985. Much has been accomplished. Indeed, it is difficult to believe that before the 1990s there was no federal agency focused on preventing fall injuries, drownings, sport concussions or bullying in schools. There was no readily available surveillance data on fatal injuries, no national associations of injury researchers or practitioners, no American Public Health Association (APHA) injury and emergency health services (ICEHS) section and few injury journals. Hardly anyone wore seatbelts and virtually no cigarettes were fire-safe. Sadly, there has been little success at limiting firearm and overdose deaths as injury prevention remains a step-child in the health field with funding not nearly commensurate to the size of the problem. Training in effective advocacy has been proposed both to help attract funding and reduce injuries. Conclusion Injury prevention pioneers have much to teach current public health students, researchers and practitioners about the history and future of the field.http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s40621-018-0177-4Injury fieldInjury pioneersHistory |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
David Hemenway |
spellingShingle |
David Hemenway Building the injury field in North America: the perspective of some of the pioneers Injury Epidemiology Injury field Injury pioneers History |
author_facet |
David Hemenway |
author_sort |
David Hemenway |
title |
Building the injury field in North America: the perspective of some of the pioneers |
title_short |
Building the injury field in North America: the perspective of some of the pioneers |
title_full |
Building the injury field in North America: the perspective of some of the pioneers |
title_fullStr |
Building the injury field in North America: the perspective of some of the pioneers |
title_full_unstemmed |
Building the injury field in North America: the perspective of some of the pioneers |
title_sort |
building the injury field in north america: the perspective of some of the pioneers |
publisher |
BMC |
series |
Injury Epidemiology |
issn |
2197-1714 |
publishDate |
2018-12-01 |
description |
Abstract Background After the publication in 1985 of Injury in America and the establishment of an injury center at the Centers for Disease Control, there was a concerted attempt to create an “injury field.” Main body Thirty-six (36) pioneers in the injury prevention field responded to questions about the major accomplishments and failures of their profession since the publication of the seminal Institute of Medicine report Injury in America in 1985. Much has been accomplished. Indeed, it is difficult to believe that before the 1990s there was no federal agency focused on preventing fall injuries, drownings, sport concussions or bullying in schools. There was no readily available surveillance data on fatal injuries, no national associations of injury researchers or practitioners, no American Public Health Association (APHA) injury and emergency health services (ICEHS) section and few injury journals. Hardly anyone wore seatbelts and virtually no cigarettes were fire-safe. Sadly, there has been little success at limiting firearm and overdose deaths as injury prevention remains a step-child in the health field with funding not nearly commensurate to the size of the problem. Training in effective advocacy has been proposed both to help attract funding and reduce injuries. Conclusion Injury prevention pioneers have much to teach current public health students, researchers and practitioners about the history and future of the field. |
topic |
Injury field Injury pioneers History |
url |
http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s40621-018-0177-4 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT davidhemenway buildingtheinjuryfieldinnorthamericatheperspectiveofsomeofthepioneers |
_version_ |
1724860553845800960 |