The Adhesion Agreements of Austria, Finland and Sweden to the European Union and the Spanish Interests

When the Council of Lisbon of 1992 gave the go-ahead to the amplification of the European Union (EU), it did so on the condition of a prior advance in political integration and the endowment of the necessary financial resources which were specified in the Treaty of European Union and the Delors Pack...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Francesc Granell
Format: Article
Language:Spanish
Published: Barcelona Centre for International Affairs (CIDOB) 1995-07-01
Series:Revista CIDOB d'Afers Internacionals
Online Access:http://www.cidob.org/es/content/download/7004/69940/file/29-30granell.pdf
id doaj-6bc3a3ab56ef4a32b5a2c10a82d0c1b1
record_format Article
spelling doaj-6bc3a3ab56ef4a32b5a2c10a82d0c1b12020-11-24T22:51:59ZspaBarcelona Centre for International Affairs (CIDOB)Revista CIDOB d'Afers Internacionals1133-65952013-035X1995-07-0129-30117137The Adhesion Agreements of Austria, Finland and Sweden to the European Union and the Spanish InterestsFrancesc GranellWhen the Council of Lisbon of 1992 gave the go-ahead to the amplification of the European Union (EU), it did so on the condition of a prior advance in political integration and the endowment of the necessary financial resources which were specified in the Treaty of European Union and the Delors Package. The author explains how thefactor that the four candidates (which ended up with the adhesion of three of them) were adhered to the European Economic Space facilitated the driving of the negotiations on a fast track.Spain, which sheltered the fear that the admission of countries traditionally unwilling to accept the transfer of sovereignty would dilute those concepts of integration, assumed the need for adhesion of these high-income countries before facing the amplification of the EU towards eastern Europe. Given the relative ease with which the candidates accepted the assumption of community patrimony, the Spanish negotiating position centred itself in its refusal to allow an increase in the blocking minority in Council voting sessions, in the maintenance of the conditions in passing to the third phase ofthe Economic and Monetary Union, in the defense of fishing and agricultural interests, in avoiding that the figures dedicated to structural funds be reduced as well as ensuring the raising of environmental standards.http://www.cidob.org/es/content/download/7004/69940/file/29-30granell.pdf
collection DOAJ
language Spanish
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Francesc Granell
spellingShingle Francesc Granell
The Adhesion Agreements of Austria, Finland and Sweden to the European Union and the Spanish Interests
Revista CIDOB d'Afers Internacionals
author_facet Francesc Granell
author_sort Francesc Granell
title The Adhesion Agreements of Austria, Finland and Sweden to the European Union and the Spanish Interests
title_short The Adhesion Agreements of Austria, Finland and Sweden to the European Union and the Spanish Interests
title_full The Adhesion Agreements of Austria, Finland and Sweden to the European Union and the Spanish Interests
title_fullStr The Adhesion Agreements of Austria, Finland and Sweden to the European Union and the Spanish Interests
title_full_unstemmed The Adhesion Agreements of Austria, Finland and Sweden to the European Union and the Spanish Interests
title_sort adhesion agreements of austria, finland and sweden to the european union and the spanish interests
publisher Barcelona Centre for International Affairs (CIDOB)
series Revista CIDOB d'Afers Internacionals
issn 1133-6595
2013-035X
publishDate 1995-07-01
description When the Council of Lisbon of 1992 gave the go-ahead to the amplification of the European Union (EU), it did so on the condition of a prior advance in political integration and the endowment of the necessary financial resources which were specified in the Treaty of European Union and the Delors Package. The author explains how thefactor that the four candidates (which ended up with the adhesion of three of them) were adhered to the European Economic Space facilitated the driving of the negotiations on a fast track.Spain, which sheltered the fear that the admission of countries traditionally unwilling to accept the transfer of sovereignty would dilute those concepts of integration, assumed the need for adhesion of these high-income countries before facing the amplification of the EU towards eastern Europe. Given the relative ease with which the candidates accepted the assumption of community patrimony, the Spanish negotiating position centred itself in its refusal to allow an increase in the blocking minority in Council voting sessions, in the maintenance of the conditions in passing to the third phase ofthe Economic and Monetary Union, in the defense of fishing and agricultural interests, in avoiding that the figures dedicated to structural funds be reduced as well as ensuring the raising of environmental standards.
url http://www.cidob.org/es/content/download/7004/69940/file/29-30granell.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT francescgranell theadhesionagreementsofaustriafinlandandswedentotheeuropeanunionandthespanishinterests
AT francescgranell adhesionagreementsofaustriafinlandandswedentotheeuropeanunionandthespanishinterests
_version_ 1725667769312083968