Leaf Area Index, Biomass Carbon and Growth Rate of Radiata Pine Genetic Types and Relationships with LiDAR

Relationships between discrete-return light detection and ranging (LiDAR) data and radiata pine leaf area index (LAI), stem volume, above ground carbon, and carbon sequestration were developed using 10 plots with directly measured biomass and leaf area data, and 36 plots with modelled carbon data. T...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Robert J. McGaughey, Graeme R. Oliver, Stephen H. Pearce, Stephen Reutebuch, Mark O. Kimberley, Peter N. Beets
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2011-08-01
Series:Forests
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.mdpi.com/1999-4907/2/3/637/
id doaj-6bb64e01d0dd41d6a178633255d1c5f2
record_format Article
spelling doaj-6bb64e01d0dd41d6a178633255d1c5f22020-11-24T23:41:28ZengMDPI AGForests1999-49072011-08-012363765910.3390/f2030637Leaf Area Index, Biomass Carbon and Growth Rate of Radiata Pine Genetic Types and Relationships with LiDARRobert J. McGaugheyGraeme R. OliverStephen H. PearceStephen ReutebuchMark O. KimberleyPeter N. BeetsRelationships between discrete-return light detection and ranging (LiDAR) data and radiata pine leaf area index (LAI), stem volume, above ground carbon, and carbon sequestration were developed using 10 plots with directly measured biomass and leaf area data, and 36 plots with modelled carbon data. The plots included a range of genetic types established on north- and south-facing aspects. Modelled carbon was highly correlated with directly measured crown, stem, and above ground biomass data, with r = 0.92, 0.97 and 0.98, respectively. LiDAR canopy percentile height (P30) and cover, based on all returns above 0.5 m, explained 81, 88, and 93% of the variation in directly measured crown, stem, and above ground live carbon and 75, 89 and 88% of the modelled carbon, respectively. LAI (all surfaces) ranged between 8.8–19.1 in the 10 plots measured at age 9 years. The difference in canopy percentile heights (P95–P30) and cover based on first returns explained 80% of the variation in total LAI. Periodic mean annual increments in stem volume, above ground live carbon, and total carbon between ages 9 and 13 years were significantly related to (P95–P30), with regression models explaining 56, 58, and 55%, respectively, of the variation in growth rate per plot. When plot aspect and genetic type were included with (P95–P30), the R2 of the regression models for stem volume, above ground live carbon, and total carbon increment increased to 90, 88, and 88%, respectively, which indicates that LiDAR regression equations for estimating stock changes can be substantially improved by incorporating supplementary site and crop data.http://www.mdpi.com/1999-4907/2/3/637/carbon stockforest carbon sinksequestrationKyoto ProtocolLiDARaspectgenetic improvement
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Robert J. McGaughey
Graeme R. Oliver
Stephen H. Pearce
Stephen Reutebuch
Mark O. Kimberley
Peter N. Beets
spellingShingle Robert J. McGaughey
Graeme R. Oliver
Stephen H. Pearce
Stephen Reutebuch
Mark O. Kimberley
Peter N. Beets
Leaf Area Index, Biomass Carbon and Growth Rate of Radiata Pine Genetic Types and Relationships with LiDAR
Forests
carbon stock
forest carbon sink
sequestration
Kyoto Protocol
LiDAR
aspect
genetic improvement
author_facet Robert J. McGaughey
Graeme R. Oliver
Stephen H. Pearce
Stephen Reutebuch
Mark O. Kimberley
Peter N. Beets
author_sort Robert J. McGaughey
title Leaf Area Index, Biomass Carbon and Growth Rate of Radiata Pine Genetic Types and Relationships with LiDAR
title_short Leaf Area Index, Biomass Carbon and Growth Rate of Radiata Pine Genetic Types and Relationships with LiDAR
title_full Leaf Area Index, Biomass Carbon and Growth Rate of Radiata Pine Genetic Types and Relationships with LiDAR
title_fullStr Leaf Area Index, Biomass Carbon and Growth Rate of Radiata Pine Genetic Types and Relationships with LiDAR
title_full_unstemmed Leaf Area Index, Biomass Carbon and Growth Rate of Radiata Pine Genetic Types and Relationships with LiDAR
title_sort leaf area index, biomass carbon and growth rate of radiata pine genetic types and relationships with lidar
publisher MDPI AG
series Forests
issn 1999-4907
publishDate 2011-08-01
description Relationships between discrete-return light detection and ranging (LiDAR) data and radiata pine leaf area index (LAI), stem volume, above ground carbon, and carbon sequestration were developed using 10 plots with directly measured biomass and leaf area data, and 36 plots with modelled carbon data. The plots included a range of genetic types established on north- and south-facing aspects. Modelled carbon was highly correlated with directly measured crown, stem, and above ground biomass data, with r = 0.92, 0.97 and 0.98, respectively. LiDAR canopy percentile height (P30) and cover, based on all returns above 0.5 m, explained 81, 88, and 93% of the variation in directly measured crown, stem, and above ground live carbon and 75, 89 and 88% of the modelled carbon, respectively. LAI (all surfaces) ranged between 8.8–19.1 in the 10 plots measured at age 9 years. The difference in canopy percentile heights (P95–P30) and cover based on first returns explained 80% of the variation in total LAI. Periodic mean annual increments in stem volume, above ground live carbon, and total carbon between ages 9 and 13 years were significantly related to (P95–P30), with regression models explaining 56, 58, and 55%, respectively, of the variation in growth rate per plot. When plot aspect and genetic type were included with (P95–P30), the R2 of the regression models for stem volume, above ground live carbon, and total carbon increment increased to 90, 88, and 88%, respectively, which indicates that LiDAR regression equations for estimating stock changes can be substantially improved by incorporating supplementary site and crop data.
topic carbon stock
forest carbon sink
sequestration
Kyoto Protocol
LiDAR
aspect
genetic improvement
url http://www.mdpi.com/1999-4907/2/3/637/
work_keys_str_mv AT robertjmcgaughey leafareaindexbiomasscarbonandgrowthrateofradiatapinegenetictypesandrelationshipswithlidar
AT graemeroliver leafareaindexbiomasscarbonandgrowthrateofradiatapinegenetictypesandrelationshipswithlidar
AT stephenhpearce leafareaindexbiomasscarbonandgrowthrateofradiatapinegenetictypesandrelationshipswithlidar
AT stephenreutebuch leafareaindexbiomasscarbonandgrowthrateofradiatapinegenetictypesandrelationshipswithlidar
AT markokimberley leafareaindexbiomasscarbonandgrowthrateofradiatapinegenetictypesandrelationshipswithlidar
AT peternbeets leafareaindexbiomasscarbonandgrowthrateofradiatapinegenetictypesandrelationshipswithlidar
_version_ 1725507206128861184