On the Global Hot Seat: University Presidents in the Global 1968

The claim that ’68 was global has become axiomatic. How so, for whom, with what impact? Scholars have productively pursued two scales of analysis: grassroots and geopolitical. While student movements have been the premier instance of the more socio-cultural scale, seldom has their mobilization been...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Deborah Cohen, Lessie Frazier
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: FahrenHouse 2019-01-01
Series:Espacio, Tiempo y Educación
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.espaciotiempoyeducacion.com/ojs/index.php/ete/article/view/277
id doaj-6b995042a9da41eea04aff52f97b8a00
record_format Article
spelling doaj-6b995042a9da41eea04aff52f97b8a002020-11-25T00:03:05ZengFahrenHouseEspacio, Tiempo y Educación2340-72632019-01-0161638610.14516/ete.277177On the Global Hot Seat: University Presidents in the Global 1968Deborah Cohen0Lessie Frazier1University of Missouri-St. LouisIndiana UniversityThe claim that ’68 was global has become axiomatic. How so, for whom, with what impact? Scholars have productively pursued two scales of analysis: grassroots and geopolitical. While student movements have been the premier instance of the more socio-cultural scale, seldom has their mobilization been analyzed vis-à-vis the ostensibly more macro scale of supra-state entitie. Intermediaries between these sectors, leaders of major universities occupied an acutely uncomfortable, pivotal place. Through historical analysis based on archival research (on the biographies of university administrators, student movements, and media debates) the Global 1968 is here considered from the perspective of higher education administrators at elite universities of capitalist empire in the mid-twentieth century at metropoles/global cities – London and New York – and semi-periphery nodes – Bloomington (Indiana, USA) and Mexico City. For such elites, consternation over the turmoil of 1968 constituted a kind of global moral panic when universities presidents found themselves the objects of intense pressures on multiple fronts: from students, to relinquish much authority, and at the same time, from fellow elites and much of the public, to forcefully discipline students. In juxtaposing brief biographies of these university presidents, we highlight the experiences and visions of the global that these men brought to the table, in relation to the pressures that they faced from student movements on their campuses as well as from political powers and the general public. These multi-scaler pressures constituted 1968 as a global phenomenon and put administrators squarely on this conjunctural hot seat.http://www.espaciotiempoyeducacion.com/ojs/index.php/ete/article/view/277global studiessixtieshigher educationstudent movementsideologymoral panic
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Deborah Cohen
Lessie Frazier
spellingShingle Deborah Cohen
Lessie Frazier
On the Global Hot Seat: University Presidents in the Global 1968
Espacio, Tiempo y Educación
global studies
sixties
higher education
student movements
ideology
moral panic
author_facet Deborah Cohen
Lessie Frazier
author_sort Deborah Cohen
title On the Global Hot Seat: University Presidents in the Global 1968
title_short On the Global Hot Seat: University Presidents in the Global 1968
title_full On the Global Hot Seat: University Presidents in the Global 1968
title_fullStr On the Global Hot Seat: University Presidents in the Global 1968
title_full_unstemmed On the Global Hot Seat: University Presidents in the Global 1968
title_sort on the global hot seat: university presidents in the global 1968
publisher FahrenHouse
series Espacio, Tiempo y Educación
issn 2340-7263
publishDate 2019-01-01
description The claim that ’68 was global has become axiomatic. How so, for whom, with what impact? Scholars have productively pursued two scales of analysis: grassroots and geopolitical. While student movements have been the premier instance of the more socio-cultural scale, seldom has their mobilization been analyzed vis-à-vis the ostensibly more macro scale of supra-state entitie. Intermediaries between these sectors, leaders of major universities occupied an acutely uncomfortable, pivotal place. Through historical analysis based on archival research (on the biographies of university administrators, student movements, and media debates) the Global 1968 is here considered from the perspective of higher education administrators at elite universities of capitalist empire in the mid-twentieth century at metropoles/global cities – London and New York – and semi-periphery nodes – Bloomington (Indiana, USA) and Mexico City. For such elites, consternation over the turmoil of 1968 constituted a kind of global moral panic when universities presidents found themselves the objects of intense pressures on multiple fronts: from students, to relinquish much authority, and at the same time, from fellow elites and much of the public, to forcefully discipline students. In juxtaposing brief biographies of these university presidents, we highlight the experiences and visions of the global that these men brought to the table, in relation to the pressures that they faced from student movements on their campuses as well as from political powers and the general public. These multi-scaler pressures constituted 1968 as a global phenomenon and put administrators squarely on this conjunctural hot seat.
topic global studies
sixties
higher education
student movements
ideology
moral panic
url http://www.espaciotiempoyeducacion.com/ojs/index.php/ete/article/view/277
work_keys_str_mv AT deborahcohen ontheglobalhotseatuniversitypresidentsintheglobal1968
AT lessiefrazier ontheglobalhotseatuniversitypresidentsintheglobal1968
_version_ 1725435150021427200