Secondary organic aerosol formation from ambient air in an oxidation flow reactor in central Amazonia
Secondary organic aerosol (SOA) formation from ambient air was studied using an oxidation flow reactor (OFR) coupled to an aerosol mass spectrometer (AMS) during both the wet and dry seasons at the Observations and Modeling of the Green Ocean Amazon (GoAmazon2014/5) field campaign. Measurements w...
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Copernicus Publications
2018-01-01
|
Series: | Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics |
Online Access: | https://www.atmos-chem-phys.net/18/467/2018/acp-18-467-2018.pdf |
id |
doaj-6b8d0bc528824232a2ff1919fed137ed |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
B. B. Palm B. B. Palm S. S. de Sá D. A. Day D. A. Day P. Campuzano-Jost P. Campuzano-Jost W. Hu W. Hu R. Seco S. J. Sjostedt J.-H. Park J.-H. Park A. B. Guenther A. B. Guenther S. Kim J. Brito J. Brito F. Wurm P. Artaxo R. Thalman R. Thalman J. Wang L. D. Yee R. Wernis G. Isaacman-VanWertz G. Isaacman-VanWertz A. H. Goldstein A. H. Goldstein Y. Liu Y. Liu S. R. Springston R. Souza M. K. Newburn M. L. Alexander S. T. Martin S. T. Martin J. L. Jimenez J. L. Jimenez |
spellingShingle |
B. B. Palm B. B. Palm S. S. de Sá D. A. Day D. A. Day P. Campuzano-Jost P. Campuzano-Jost W. Hu W. Hu R. Seco S. J. Sjostedt J.-H. Park J.-H. Park A. B. Guenther A. B. Guenther S. Kim J. Brito J. Brito F. Wurm P. Artaxo R. Thalman R. Thalman J. Wang L. D. Yee R. Wernis G. Isaacman-VanWertz G. Isaacman-VanWertz A. H. Goldstein A. H. Goldstein Y. Liu Y. Liu S. R. Springston R. Souza M. K. Newburn M. L. Alexander S. T. Martin S. T. Martin J. L. Jimenez J. L. Jimenez Secondary organic aerosol formation from ambient air in an oxidation flow reactor in central Amazonia Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics |
author_facet |
B. B. Palm B. B. Palm S. S. de Sá D. A. Day D. A. Day P. Campuzano-Jost P. Campuzano-Jost W. Hu W. Hu R. Seco S. J. Sjostedt J.-H. Park J.-H. Park A. B. Guenther A. B. Guenther S. Kim J. Brito J. Brito F. Wurm P. Artaxo R. Thalman R. Thalman J. Wang L. D. Yee R. Wernis G. Isaacman-VanWertz G. Isaacman-VanWertz A. H. Goldstein A. H. Goldstein Y. Liu Y. Liu S. R. Springston R. Souza M. K. Newburn M. L. Alexander S. T. Martin S. T. Martin J. L. Jimenez J. L. Jimenez |
author_sort |
B. B. Palm |
title |
Secondary organic aerosol formation from ambient air in an oxidation flow reactor in central Amazonia |
title_short |
Secondary organic aerosol formation from ambient air in an oxidation flow reactor in central Amazonia |
title_full |
Secondary organic aerosol formation from ambient air in an oxidation flow reactor in central Amazonia |
title_fullStr |
Secondary organic aerosol formation from ambient air in an oxidation flow reactor in central Amazonia |
title_full_unstemmed |
Secondary organic aerosol formation from ambient air in an oxidation flow reactor in central Amazonia |
title_sort |
secondary organic aerosol formation from ambient air in an oxidation flow reactor in central amazonia |
publisher |
Copernicus Publications |
series |
Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics |
issn |
1680-7316 1680-7324 |
publishDate |
2018-01-01 |
description |
Secondary organic aerosol (SOA) formation from ambient air was studied using
an oxidation flow reactor (OFR) coupled to an aerosol mass spectrometer
(AMS) during both the wet and dry seasons at the Observations and Modeling
of the Green Ocean Amazon (GoAmazon2014/5) field campaign. Measurements were
made at two sites downwind of the city of Manaus, Brazil. Ambient air was
oxidized in the OFR using variable concentrations of either OH or O<sub>3</sub>,
over ranges from hours to days (O<sub>3</sub>) or weeks (OH) of equivalent
atmospheric aging. The amount of SOA formed in the OFR ranged from 0 to as
much as 10 µg m<sup>−3</sup>, depending on the amount of SOA precursor
gases in ambient air. Typically, more SOA was formed during nighttime than
daytime, and more from OH than from O<sub>3</sub> oxidation. SOA yields of
individual organic precursors under OFR conditions were measured by standard
addition into ambient air and were confirmed to be consistent with published
environmental chamber-derived SOA yields. Positive matrix factorization of
organic aerosol (OA) after OH oxidation showed formation of typical oxidized
OA factors and a loss of primary OA factors as OH aging increased. After OH
oxidation in the OFR, the hygroscopicity of the OA increased with increasing
elemental O : C up to O : C ∼ 1.0, and then decreased as O : C
increased further. Possible reasons for this decrease are discussed. The
measured SOA formation was compared to the amount predicted from the
concentrations of measured ambient SOA precursors and their SOA yields.
While measured ambient precursors were sufficient to explain the amount of
SOA formed from O<sub>3</sub>, they could only explain 10–50 % of the SOA
formed from OH. This is consistent with previous OFR studies, which showed
that typically unmeasured semivolatile and intermediate volatility gases
(that tend to lack C = C bonds) are present in ambient air and can explain
such additional SOA formation. To investigate the sources of the unmeasured
SOA-forming gases during this campaign, multilinear regression analysis was
performed between measured SOA formation and the concentration of gas-phase
tracers representing different precursor sources. The majority of
SOA-forming gases present during both seasons were of biogenic origin. Urban
sources also contributed substantially in both seasons, while biomass
burning sources were more important during the dry season. This study
enables a better understanding of SOA formation in environments with diverse
emission sources. |
url |
https://www.atmos-chem-phys.net/18/467/2018/acp-18-467-2018.pdf |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT bbpalm secondaryorganicaerosolformationfromambientairinanoxidationflowreactorincentralamazonia AT bbpalm secondaryorganicaerosolformationfromambientairinanoxidationflowreactorincentralamazonia AT ssdesa secondaryorganicaerosolformationfromambientairinanoxidationflowreactorincentralamazonia AT daday secondaryorganicaerosolformationfromambientairinanoxidationflowreactorincentralamazonia AT daday secondaryorganicaerosolformationfromambientairinanoxidationflowreactorincentralamazonia AT pcampuzanojost secondaryorganicaerosolformationfromambientairinanoxidationflowreactorincentralamazonia AT pcampuzanojost secondaryorganicaerosolformationfromambientairinanoxidationflowreactorincentralamazonia AT whu secondaryorganicaerosolformationfromambientairinanoxidationflowreactorincentralamazonia AT whu secondaryorganicaerosolformationfromambientairinanoxidationflowreactorincentralamazonia AT rseco secondaryorganicaerosolformationfromambientairinanoxidationflowreactorincentralamazonia AT sjsjostedt secondaryorganicaerosolformationfromambientairinanoxidationflowreactorincentralamazonia AT jhpark secondaryorganicaerosolformationfromambientairinanoxidationflowreactorincentralamazonia AT jhpark secondaryorganicaerosolformationfromambientairinanoxidationflowreactorincentralamazonia AT abguenther secondaryorganicaerosolformationfromambientairinanoxidationflowreactorincentralamazonia AT abguenther secondaryorganicaerosolformationfromambientairinanoxidationflowreactorincentralamazonia AT skim secondaryorganicaerosolformationfromambientairinanoxidationflowreactorincentralamazonia AT jbrito secondaryorganicaerosolformationfromambientairinanoxidationflowreactorincentralamazonia AT jbrito secondaryorganicaerosolformationfromambientairinanoxidationflowreactorincentralamazonia AT fwurm secondaryorganicaerosolformationfromambientairinanoxidationflowreactorincentralamazonia AT partaxo secondaryorganicaerosolformationfromambientairinanoxidationflowreactorincentralamazonia AT rthalman secondaryorganicaerosolformationfromambientairinanoxidationflowreactorincentralamazonia AT rthalman secondaryorganicaerosolformationfromambientairinanoxidationflowreactorincentralamazonia AT jwang secondaryorganicaerosolformationfromambientairinanoxidationflowreactorincentralamazonia AT ldyee secondaryorganicaerosolformationfromambientairinanoxidationflowreactorincentralamazonia AT rwernis secondaryorganicaerosolformationfromambientairinanoxidationflowreactorincentralamazonia AT gisaacmanvanwertz secondaryorganicaerosolformationfromambientairinanoxidationflowreactorincentralamazonia AT gisaacmanvanwertz secondaryorganicaerosolformationfromambientairinanoxidationflowreactorincentralamazonia AT ahgoldstein secondaryorganicaerosolformationfromambientairinanoxidationflowreactorincentralamazonia AT ahgoldstein secondaryorganicaerosolformationfromambientairinanoxidationflowreactorincentralamazonia AT yliu secondaryorganicaerosolformationfromambientairinanoxidationflowreactorincentralamazonia AT yliu secondaryorganicaerosolformationfromambientairinanoxidationflowreactorincentralamazonia AT srspringston secondaryorganicaerosolformationfromambientairinanoxidationflowreactorincentralamazonia AT rsouza secondaryorganicaerosolformationfromambientairinanoxidationflowreactorincentralamazonia AT mknewburn secondaryorganicaerosolformationfromambientairinanoxidationflowreactorincentralamazonia AT mlalexander secondaryorganicaerosolformationfromambientairinanoxidationflowreactorincentralamazonia AT stmartin secondaryorganicaerosolformationfromambientairinanoxidationflowreactorincentralamazonia AT stmartin secondaryorganicaerosolformationfromambientairinanoxidationflowreactorincentralamazonia AT jljimenez secondaryorganicaerosolformationfromambientairinanoxidationflowreactorincentralamazonia AT jljimenez secondaryorganicaerosolformationfromambientairinanoxidationflowreactorincentralamazonia |
_version_ |
1716799625135915008 |
spelling |
doaj-6b8d0bc528824232a2ff1919fed137ed2020-11-24T20:52:27ZengCopernicus PublicationsAtmospheric Chemistry and Physics1680-73161680-73242018-01-011846749310.5194/acp-18-467-2018Secondary organic aerosol formation from ambient air in an oxidation flow reactor in central AmazoniaB. B. Palm0B. B. Palm1S. S. de Sá2D. A. Day3D. A. Day4P. Campuzano-Jost5P. Campuzano-Jost6W. Hu7W. Hu8R. Seco9S. J. Sjostedt10J.-H. Park11J.-H. Park12A. B. Guenther13A. B. Guenther14S. Kim15J. Brito16J. Brito17F. Wurm18P. Artaxo19R. Thalman20R. Thalman21J. Wang22L. D. Yee23R. Wernis24G. Isaacman-VanWertz25G. Isaacman-VanWertz26A. H. Goldstein27A. H. Goldstein28Y. Liu29Y. Liu30S. R. Springston31R. Souza32M. K. Newburn33M. L. Alexander34S. T. Martin35S. T. Martin36J. L. Jimenez37J. L. Jimenez38Cooperative Institute for Research in Environmental Sciences, University of Colorado, Boulder, CO, USADept. of Chemistry, University of Colorado, Boulder, CO, USASchool of Engineering and Applied Sciences, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, USACooperative Institute for Research in Environmental Sciences, University of Colorado, Boulder, CO, USADept. of Chemistry, University of Colorado, Boulder, CO, USACooperative Institute for Research in Environmental Sciences, University of Colorado, Boulder, CO, USADept. of Chemistry, University of Colorado, Boulder, CO, USACooperative Institute for Research in Environmental Sciences, University of Colorado, Boulder, CO, USADept. of Chemistry, University of Colorado, Boulder, CO, USADept. of Earth System Science, University of California, Irvine, CA, USAEarth System Research Laboratory, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Boulder, CO, USANational Center for Atmospheric Research, Boulder, CO, USAnow at: Climate and Air Quality Research Department, National Institute of Environmental Research (NIER), Incheon, 22689, Republic of KoreaDept. of Earth System Science, University of California, Irvine, CA, USADiv. of Atmospheric Sciences & Global Change, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, WA, USADept. of Earth System Science, University of California, Irvine, CA, USAInstitute of Physics, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazilnow at: Laboratory for Meteorological Physics (LaMP), Université Clermont Auvergne, 63000 Clermont-Ferrand, FranceInstitute of Physics, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, BrazilInstitute of Physics, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, BrazilEnvironmental and Climate Sciences Department, Brookhaven National Laboratory, Upton, NY, USAnow at: Department of Chemistry, Snow College, Richfield, UT, USAEnvironmental and Climate Sciences Department, Brookhaven National Laboratory, Upton, NY, USADepartment of Environmental Science, Policy, and Management, University of California, Berkeley, CA, USADepartment of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of California, Berkeley, CA, USADepartment of Environmental Science, Policy, and Management, University of California, Berkeley, CA, USAnow at: Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA, USADepartment of Environmental Science, Policy, and Management, University of California, Berkeley, CA, USADepartment of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of California, Berkeley, CA, USASchool of Engineering and Applied Sciences, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, USAnow at: Department of Environmental Science, Policy, and Management, University of California, Berkeley, CA, USAEnvironmental and Climate Sciences Department, Brookhaven National Laboratory, Upton, NY, USAUniversity of the State of Amazonas, Manaus, BrazilEnvironmental and Molecular Sciences Laboratory, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, WA, USAEnvironmental and Molecular Sciences Laboratory, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, WA, USASchool of Engineering and Applied Sciences, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, USADepartment of Earth and Planetary Sciences, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, USACooperative Institute for Research in Environmental Sciences, University of Colorado, Boulder, CO, USADept. of Chemistry, University of Colorado, Boulder, CO, USASecondary organic aerosol (SOA) formation from ambient air was studied using an oxidation flow reactor (OFR) coupled to an aerosol mass spectrometer (AMS) during both the wet and dry seasons at the Observations and Modeling of the Green Ocean Amazon (GoAmazon2014/5) field campaign. Measurements were made at two sites downwind of the city of Manaus, Brazil. Ambient air was oxidized in the OFR using variable concentrations of either OH or O<sub>3</sub>, over ranges from hours to days (O<sub>3</sub>) or weeks (OH) of equivalent atmospheric aging. The amount of SOA formed in the OFR ranged from 0 to as much as 10 µg m<sup>−3</sup>, depending on the amount of SOA precursor gases in ambient air. Typically, more SOA was formed during nighttime than daytime, and more from OH than from O<sub>3</sub> oxidation. SOA yields of individual organic precursors under OFR conditions were measured by standard addition into ambient air and were confirmed to be consistent with published environmental chamber-derived SOA yields. Positive matrix factorization of organic aerosol (OA) after OH oxidation showed formation of typical oxidized OA factors and a loss of primary OA factors as OH aging increased. After OH oxidation in the OFR, the hygroscopicity of the OA increased with increasing elemental O : C up to O : C ∼ 1.0, and then decreased as O : C increased further. Possible reasons for this decrease are discussed. The measured SOA formation was compared to the amount predicted from the concentrations of measured ambient SOA precursors and their SOA yields. While measured ambient precursors were sufficient to explain the amount of SOA formed from O<sub>3</sub>, they could only explain 10–50 % of the SOA formed from OH. This is consistent with previous OFR studies, which showed that typically unmeasured semivolatile and intermediate volatility gases (that tend to lack C = C bonds) are present in ambient air and can explain such additional SOA formation. To investigate the sources of the unmeasured SOA-forming gases during this campaign, multilinear regression analysis was performed between measured SOA formation and the concentration of gas-phase tracers representing different precursor sources. The majority of SOA-forming gases present during both seasons were of biogenic origin. Urban sources also contributed substantially in both seasons, while biomass burning sources were more important during the dry season. This study enables a better understanding of SOA formation in environments with diverse emission sources.https://www.atmos-chem-phys.net/18/467/2018/acp-18-467-2018.pdf |