Beyond stereotypes of adolescent risk taking: Placing the adolescent brain in developmental context

Recent neuroscience models of adolescent brain development attribute the morbidity and mortality of this period to structural and functional imbalances between more fully developed limbic regions that subserve reward and emotion as opposed to those that enable cognitive control. We challenge this in...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Daniel Romer, Valerie F. Reyna, Theodore D. Satterthwaite
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2017-10-01
Series:Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1878929317301020
id doaj-6b85f7b4975d4d8ea627eba143bb05d2
record_format Article
spelling doaj-6b85f7b4975d4d8ea627eba143bb05d22020-11-25T02:10:26ZengElsevierDevelopmental Cognitive Neuroscience1878-92932017-10-01271934Beyond stereotypes of adolescent risk taking: Placing the adolescent brain in developmental contextDaniel Romer0Valerie F. Reyna1Theodore D. Satterthwaite2Annenberg Public Policy Center, University of Pennsylvania, United States; Corresponding author.Human Neuroscience Institute, Cornell University, United StatesDepartment of Psychiatry, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, United StatesRecent neuroscience models of adolescent brain development attribute the morbidity and mortality of this period to structural and functional imbalances between more fully developed limbic regions that subserve reward and emotion as opposed to those that enable cognitive control. We challenge this interpretation of adolescent development by distinguishing risk-taking that peaks during adolescence (sensation seeking and impulsive action) from risk taking that declines monotonically from childhood to adulthood (impulsive choice and other decisions under known risk). Sensation seeking is primarily motivated by exploration of the environment under ambiguous risk contexts, while impulsive action, which is likely to be maladaptive, is more characteristic of a subset of youth with weak control over limbic motivation. Risk taking that declines monotonically from childhood to adulthood occurs primarily under conditions of known risks and reflects increases in executive function as well as aversion to risk based on increases in gist-based reasoning. We propose an alternative Life-span Wisdom Model that highlights the importance of experience gained through exploration during adolescence. We propose, therefore, that brain models that recognize the adaptive roles that cognition and experience play during adolescence provide a more complete and helpful picture of this period of development. Keywords: Brain development, Dopamine, Decision-making, Cognitive control, Experiencehttp://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1878929317301020
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Daniel Romer
Valerie F. Reyna
Theodore D. Satterthwaite
spellingShingle Daniel Romer
Valerie F. Reyna
Theodore D. Satterthwaite
Beyond stereotypes of adolescent risk taking: Placing the adolescent brain in developmental context
Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience
author_facet Daniel Romer
Valerie F. Reyna
Theodore D. Satterthwaite
author_sort Daniel Romer
title Beyond stereotypes of adolescent risk taking: Placing the adolescent brain in developmental context
title_short Beyond stereotypes of adolescent risk taking: Placing the adolescent brain in developmental context
title_full Beyond stereotypes of adolescent risk taking: Placing the adolescent brain in developmental context
title_fullStr Beyond stereotypes of adolescent risk taking: Placing the adolescent brain in developmental context
title_full_unstemmed Beyond stereotypes of adolescent risk taking: Placing the adolescent brain in developmental context
title_sort beyond stereotypes of adolescent risk taking: placing the adolescent brain in developmental context
publisher Elsevier
series Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience
issn 1878-9293
publishDate 2017-10-01
description Recent neuroscience models of adolescent brain development attribute the morbidity and mortality of this period to structural and functional imbalances between more fully developed limbic regions that subserve reward and emotion as opposed to those that enable cognitive control. We challenge this interpretation of adolescent development by distinguishing risk-taking that peaks during adolescence (sensation seeking and impulsive action) from risk taking that declines monotonically from childhood to adulthood (impulsive choice and other decisions under known risk). Sensation seeking is primarily motivated by exploration of the environment under ambiguous risk contexts, while impulsive action, which is likely to be maladaptive, is more characteristic of a subset of youth with weak control over limbic motivation. Risk taking that declines monotonically from childhood to adulthood occurs primarily under conditions of known risks and reflects increases in executive function as well as aversion to risk based on increases in gist-based reasoning. We propose an alternative Life-span Wisdom Model that highlights the importance of experience gained through exploration during adolescence. We propose, therefore, that brain models that recognize the adaptive roles that cognition and experience play during adolescence provide a more complete and helpful picture of this period of development. Keywords: Brain development, Dopamine, Decision-making, Cognitive control, Experience
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1878929317301020
work_keys_str_mv AT danielromer beyondstereotypesofadolescentrisktakingplacingtheadolescentbrainindevelopmentalcontext
AT valeriefreyna beyondstereotypesofadolescentrisktakingplacingtheadolescentbrainindevelopmentalcontext
AT theodoredsatterthwaite beyondstereotypesofadolescentrisktakingplacingtheadolescentbrainindevelopmentalcontext
_version_ 1724919767118118912