Making Sense of Questions in Logic and Mathematics: Mill vs. Carnap
Whether mathematical truths are syntactical (as Rudolf Carnap claimed) or empirical (as Mill actually never claimed, though Carnap claimed that he did) might seem merely an academic topic. However, it becomes a practical concern as soon as we consider the role of questions. For if we inquire as to t...
Main Author: | ESTHER RAMHARTER |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Society for the Advancement of Philosophy
2006-12-01
|
Series: | Prolegomena |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://www.hrstud.hr/prolegomena/Pro-2006-2/06-2-Art-Ramharter.pdf |
Similar Items
-
An Axiomatic Account of Question Evocation: The Propositional Case
by: Andrzej Wiśniewski
Published: (2016-05-01) -
Erotetic Reasoning Corpus. A data set for research on natural question processing
by: Paweł Łupkowski, et al.
Published: (2018-04-01) -
Understanding Scientific Inquiry
by: Peter J. Veazie
Published: (2018-12-01) -
A Cut-Free Sequent Calculus for Defeasible Erotetic Inferences
by: Millson, J.
Published: (2019) -
The arbitrary in logic: Russell, Wittgenstein, Carnap
by: Johnson, Clark B., 1943-
Published: (1967)