Microbiota data from low biomass milk samples is markedly affected by laboratory and reagent contamination.
Discoveries of bacterial communities in environments that previously have been described as sterile have in recent years radically challenged the view of these environments. In this study we aimed to use 16S rRNA sequencing to describe the composition and temporal stability of the bacterial microbio...
Main Authors: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
2019-01-01
|
Series: | PLoS ONE |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0218257 |
id |
doaj-6b67615f287b436b9ca7a50966d134db |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-6b67615f287b436b9ca7a50966d134db2021-03-03T21:09:31ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032019-01-01146e021825710.1371/journal.pone.0218257Microbiota data from low biomass milk samples is markedly affected by laboratory and reagent contamination.Josef DahlbergLi SunKarin Persson WallerKarin ÖstenssonMark McGuireSigrid AgenäsJohan DicksvedDiscoveries of bacterial communities in environments that previously have been described as sterile have in recent years radically challenged the view of these environments. In this study we aimed to use 16S rRNA sequencing to describe the composition and temporal stability of the bacterial microbiota in bovine milk from healthy udder quarters, an environment previously believed to be sterile. Sequencing of the 16S rRNA gene is a technique commonly used to describe bacterial composition and diversity in various environments. With the increased use of 16S rRNA gene sequencing, awareness of methodological pitfalls such as biases and contamination has increased although not in equal amount. Evaluation of the composition and temporal stability of the microbiota in 288 milk samples was largely hampered by background contamination, despite careful and aseptic sample processing. Sequencing of no template control samples, positive control samples, with defined levels of bacteria, and 288 milk samples with various levels of bacterial growth, revealed that the data was influenced by contaminating taxa, primarily Methylobacterium. We observed an increasing impact of contamination with decreasing microbial biomass where the contaminating taxa became dominant in samples with less than 104 bacterial cells per mL. By applying a contamination filtration on the sequence data, the amount of sequences was substantially reduced but only a minor impact on number of identified taxa and by culture known endogenous taxa was observed. This suggests that data filtration can be useful for identifying biologically relevant associations in milk microbiota data.https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0218257 |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Josef Dahlberg Li Sun Karin Persson Waller Karin Östensson Mark McGuire Sigrid Agenäs Johan Dicksved |
spellingShingle |
Josef Dahlberg Li Sun Karin Persson Waller Karin Östensson Mark McGuire Sigrid Agenäs Johan Dicksved Microbiota data from low biomass milk samples is markedly affected by laboratory and reagent contamination. PLoS ONE |
author_facet |
Josef Dahlberg Li Sun Karin Persson Waller Karin Östensson Mark McGuire Sigrid Agenäs Johan Dicksved |
author_sort |
Josef Dahlberg |
title |
Microbiota data from low biomass milk samples is markedly affected by laboratory and reagent contamination. |
title_short |
Microbiota data from low biomass milk samples is markedly affected by laboratory and reagent contamination. |
title_full |
Microbiota data from low biomass milk samples is markedly affected by laboratory and reagent contamination. |
title_fullStr |
Microbiota data from low biomass milk samples is markedly affected by laboratory and reagent contamination. |
title_full_unstemmed |
Microbiota data from low biomass milk samples is markedly affected by laboratory and reagent contamination. |
title_sort |
microbiota data from low biomass milk samples is markedly affected by laboratory and reagent contamination. |
publisher |
Public Library of Science (PLoS) |
series |
PLoS ONE |
issn |
1932-6203 |
publishDate |
2019-01-01 |
description |
Discoveries of bacterial communities in environments that previously have been described as sterile have in recent years radically challenged the view of these environments. In this study we aimed to use 16S rRNA sequencing to describe the composition and temporal stability of the bacterial microbiota in bovine milk from healthy udder quarters, an environment previously believed to be sterile. Sequencing of the 16S rRNA gene is a technique commonly used to describe bacterial composition and diversity in various environments. With the increased use of 16S rRNA gene sequencing, awareness of methodological pitfalls such as biases and contamination has increased although not in equal amount. Evaluation of the composition and temporal stability of the microbiota in 288 milk samples was largely hampered by background contamination, despite careful and aseptic sample processing. Sequencing of no template control samples, positive control samples, with defined levels of bacteria, and 288 milk samples with various levels of bacterial growth, revealed that the data was influenced by contaminating taxa, primarily Methylobacterium. We observed an increasing impact of contamination with decreasing microbial biomass where the contaminating taxa became dominant in samples with less than 104 bacterial cells per mL. By applying a contamination filtration on the sequence data, the amount of sequences was substantially reduced but only a minor impact on number of identified taxa and by culture known endogenous taxa was observed. This suggests that data filtration can be useful for identifying biologically relevant associations in milk microbiota data. |
url |
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0218257 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT josefdahlberg microbiotadatafromlowbiomassmilksamplesismarkedlyaffectedbylaboratoryandreagentcontamination AT lisun microbiotadatafromlowbiomassmilksamplesismarkedlyaffectedbylaboratoryandreagentcontamination AT karinperssonwaller microbiotadatafromlowbiomassmilksamplesismarkedlyaffectedbylaboratoryandreagentcontamination AT karinostensson microbiotadatafromlowbiomassmilksamplesismarkedlyaffectedbylaboratoryandreagentcontamination AT markmcguire microbiotadatafromlowbiomassmilksamplesismarkedlyaffectedbylaboratoryandreagentcontamination AT sigridagenas microbiotadatafromlowbiomassmilksamplesismarkedlyaffectedbylaboratoryandreagentcontamination AT johandicksved microbiotadatafromlowbiomassmilksamplesismarkedlyaffectedbylaboratoryandreagentcontamination |
_version_ |
1714818429234446336 |