Microbiota data from low biomass milk samples is markedly affected by laboratory and reagent contamination.

Discoveries of bacterial communities in environments that previously have been described as sterile have in recent years radically challenged the view of these environments. In this study we aimed to use 16S rRNA sequencing to describe the composition and temporal stability of the bacterial microbio...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Josef Dahlberg, Li Sun, Karin Persson Waller, Karin Östensson, Mark McGuire, Sigrid Agenäs, Johan Dicksved
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2019-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0218257
id doaj-6b67615f287b436b9ca7a50966d134db
record_format Article
spelling doaj-6b67615f287b436b9ca7a50966d134db2021-03-03T21:09:31ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032019-01-01146e021825710.1371/journal.pone.0218257Microbiota data from low biomass milk samples is markedly affected by laboratory and reagent contamination.Josef DahlbergLi SunKarin Persson WallerKarin ÖstenssonMark McGuireSigrid AgenäsJohan DicksvedDiscoveries of bacterial communities in environments that previously have been described as sterile have in recent years radically challenged the view of these environments. In this study we aimed to use 16S rRNA sequencing to describe the composition and temporal stability of the bacterial microbiota in bovine milk from healthy udder quarters, an environment previously believed to be sterile. Sequencing of the 16S rRNA gene is a technique commonly used to describe bacterial composition and diversity in various environments. With the increased use of 16S rRNA gene sequencing, awareness of methodological pitfalls such as biases and contamination has increased although not in equal amount. Evaluation of the composition and temporal stability of the microbiota in 288 milk samples was largely hampered by background contamination, despite careful and aseptic sample processing. Sequencing of no template control samples, positive control samples, with defined levels of bacteria, and 288 milk samples with various levels of bacterial growth, revealed that the data was influenced by contaminating taxa, primarily Methylobacterium. We observed an increasing impact of contamination with decreasing microbial biomass where the contaminating taxa became dominant in samples with less than 104 bacterial cells per mL. By applying a contamination filtration on the sequence data, the amount of sequences was substantially reduced but only a minor impact on number of identified taxa and by culture known endogenous taxa was observed. This suggests that data filtration can be useful for identifying biologically relevant associations in milk microbiota data.https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0218257
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Josef Dahlberg
Li Sun
Karin Persson Waller
Karin Östensson
Mark McGuire
Sigrid Agenäs
Johan Dicksved
spellingShingle Josef Dahlberg
Li Sun
Karin Persson Waller
Karin Östensson
Mark McGuire
Sigrid Agenäs
Johan Dicksved
Microbiota data from low biomass milk samples is markedly affected by laboratory and reagent contamination.
PLoS ONE
author_facet Josef Dahlberg
Li Sun
Karin Persson Waller
Karin Östensson
Mark McGuire
Sigrid Agenäs
Johan Dicksved
author_sort Josef Dahlberg
title Microbiota data from low biomass milk samples is markedly affected by laboratory and reagent contamination.
title_short Microbiota data from low biomass milk samples is markedly affected by laboratory and reagent contamination.
title_full Microbiota data from low biomass milk samples is markedly affected by laboratory and reagent contamination.
title_fullStr Microbiota data from low biomass milk samples is markedly affected by laboratory and reagent contamination.
title_full_unstemmed Microbiota data from low biomass milk samples is markedly affected by laboratory and reagent contamination.
title_sort microbiota data from low biomass milk samples is markedly affected by laboratory and reagent contamination.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
series PLoS ONE
issn 1932-6203
publishDate 2019-01-01
description Discoveries of bacterial communities in environments that previously have been described as sterile have in recent years radically challenged the view of these environments. In this study we aimed to use 16S rRNA sequencing to describe the composition and temporal stability of the bacterial microbiota in bovine milk from healthy udder quarters, an environment previously believed to be sterile. Sequencing of the 16S rRNA gene is a technique commonly used to describe bacterial composition and diversity in various environments. With the increased use of 16S rRNA gene sequencing, awareness of methodological pitfalls such as biases and contamination has increased although not in equal amount. Evaluation of the composition and temporal stability of the microbiota in 288 milk samples was largely hampered by background contamination, despite careful and aseptic sample processing. Sequencing of no template control samples, positive control samples, with defined levels of bacteria, and 288 milk samples with various levels of bacterial growth, revealed that the data was influenced by contaminating taxa, primarily Methylobacterium. We observed an increasing impact of contamination with decreasing microbial biomass where the contaminating taxa became dominant in samples with less than 104 bacterial cells per mL. By applying a contamination filtration on the sequence data, the amount of sequences was substantially reduced but only a minor impact on number of identified taxa and by culture known endogenous taxa was observed. This suggests that data filtration can be useful for identifying biologically relevant associations in milk microbiota data.
url https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0218257
work_keys_str_mv AT josefdahlberg microbiotadatafromlowbiomassmilksamplesismarkedlyaffectedbylaboratoryandreagentcontamination
AT lisun microbiotadatafromlowbiomassmilksamplesismarkedlyaffectedbylaboratoryandreagentcontamination
AT karinperssonwaller microbiotadatafromlowbiomassmilksamplesismarkedlyaffectedbylaboratoryandreagentcontamination
AT karinostensson microbiotadatafromlowbiomassmilksamplesismarkedlyaffectedbylaboratoryandreagentcontamination
AT markmcguire microbiotadatafromlowbiomassmilksamplesismarkedlyaffectedbylaboratoryandreagentcontamination
AT sigridagenas microbiotadatafromlowbiomassmilksamplesismarkedlyaffectedbylaboratoryandreagentcontamination
AT johandicksved microbiotadatafromlowbiomassmilksamplesismarkedlyaffectedbylaboratoryandreagentcontamination
_version_ 1714818429234446336