Disinventing and (re)constituting languages

http://dx.doi.org/10.5007/1984-8420.2015v16n2p9 In this paper we argue that although the problematic nature of language con­struction has been acknowledged by a number of skeptical authors, including the recent claim in this journal (REAGAN, 2004) that there is no such thing as English or any other...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Sinfree Makoni, Alastair Pennycook, Tradução de Cristine Gorski Severo
Format: Article
Language:Portuguese
Published: Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina, Programa de Pós-Graduação em Linguística 2015-12-01
Series:Working Papers em Linguística
Subjects:
Online Access:https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/workingpapers/article/view/45820
id doaj-6b637dfe0e2a4ee3af9ce7e57d258075
record_format Article
spelling doaj-6b637dfe0e2a4ee3af9ce7e57d2580752020-11-25T00:26:00ZporUniversidade Federal de Santa Catarina, Programa de Pós-Graduação em LinguísticaWorking Papers em Linguística1984-84202015-12-0116293410.5007/1984-8420.2015v16n2p926055Disinventing and (re)constituting languagesSinfree Makoni0Alastair Pennycook1Tradução de Cristine Gorski Severo2Pennsylvania State UniversityUniversity of Technology SydneyUniversidade Federal de Santa Catarina http://buscatextual.cnpq.br/buscatextual/visualizacv.do?metodo=apresentar&id=K4749606T9http://dx.doi.org/10.5007/1984-8420.2015v16n2p9 In this paper we argue that although the problematic nature of language con­struction has been acknowledged by a number of skeptical authors, including the recent claim in this journal (REAGAN, 2004) that there is no such thing as English or any other language, this critical approach to language still needs to develop a broader understand­ing of the processes of invention. A central part of our argument, therefore, is that it is not enough to acknowledge that languages have been invented, nor that linguistic meta­language constructs the world in particular ways; rather, we need to understand the in­terrelationships among metadiscursive regimes, language inventions, colonial history, language effects, alternative ways of understanding language, and strategies of disinven­tion and reconstitution. Any critical (applied) linguistic project that aims to deal with language in the contemporary world, however estimable its political intent may be, must also have ways of understanding the detrimental language effects it may engender unless it confronts the need for linguistic disinvention and reconstitution.https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/workingpapers/article/view/45820invençãodesinvençãopolítica linguísticaabordagem crítica
collection DOAJ
language Portuguese
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Sinfree Makoni
Alastair Pennycook
Tradução de Cristine Gorski Severo
spellingShingle Sinfree Makoni
Alastair Pennycook
Tradução de Cristine Gorski Severo
Disinventing and (re)constituting languages
Working Papers em Linguística
invenção
desinvenção
política linguística
abordagem crítica
author_facet Sinfree Makoni
Alastair Pennycook
Tradução de Cristine Gorski Severo
author_sort Sinfree Makoni
title Disinventing and (re)constituting languages
title_short Disinventing and (re)constituting languages
title_full Disinventing and (re)constituting languages
title_fullStr Disinventing and (re)constituting languages
title_full_unstemmed Disinventing and (re)constituting languages
title_sort disinventing and (re)constituting languages
publisher Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina, Programa de Pós-Graduação em Linguística
series Working Papers em Linguística
issn 1984-8420
publishDate 2015-12-01
description http://dx.doi.org/10.5007/1984-8420.2015v16n2p9 In this paper we argue that although the problematic nature of language con­struction has been acknowledged by a number of skeptical authors, including the recent claim in this journal (REAGAN, 2004) that there is no such thing as English or any other language, this critical approach to language still needs to develop a broader understand­ing of the processes of invention. A central part of our argument, therefore, is that it is not enough to acknowledge that languages have been invented, nor that linguistic meta­language constructs the world in particular ways; rather, we need to understand the in­terrelationships among metadiscursive regimes, language inventions, colonial history, language effects, alternative ways of understanding language, and strategies of disinven­tion and reconstitution. Any critical (applied) linguistic project that aims to deal with language in the contemporary world, however estimable its political intent may be, must also have ways of understanding the detrimental language effects it may engender unless it confronts the need for linguistic disinvention and reconstitution.
topic invenção
desinvenção
política linguística
abordagem crítica
url https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/workingpapers/article/view/45820
work_keys_str_mv AT sinfreemakoni disinventingandreconstitutinglanguages
AT alastairpennycook disinventingandreconstitutinglanguages
AT traducaodecristinegorskisevero disinventingandreconstitutinglanguages
_version_ 1725346531653976064