Estimating a Logistic Discrimination Functions When One of the Training Samples Is Subject to Misclassification: A Maximum Likelihood Approach.

The problem of discrimination and classification is central to much of epidemiology. Here we consider the estimation of a logistic regression/discrimination function from training samples, when one of the training samples is subject to misclassification or mislabeling, e.g. diseased individuals are...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Nico Nagelkerke, Vaclav Fidler
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2015-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4608588?pdf=render
id doaj-6b624cb89d554459a9546f136657833e
record_format Article
spelling doaj-6b624cb89d554459a9546f136657833e2020-11-24T21:54:49ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032015-01-011010e014071810.1371/journal.pone.0140718Estimating a Logistic Discrimination Functions When One of the Training Samples Is Subject to Misclassification: A Maximum Likelihood Approach.Nico NagelkerkeVaclav FidlerThe problem of discrimination and classification is central to much of epidemiology. Here we consider the estimation of a logistic regression/discrimination function from training samples, when one of the training samples is subject to misclassification or mislabeling, e.g. diseased individuals are incorrectly classified/labeled as healthy controls. We show that this leads to zero-inflated binomial model with a defective logistic regression or discrimination function, whose parameters can be estimated using standard statistical methods such as maximum likelihood. These parameters can be used to estimate the probability of true group membership among those, possibly erroneously, classified as controls. Two examples are analyzed and discussed. A simulation study explores properties of the maximum likelihood parameter estimates and the estimates of the number of mislabeled observations.http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4608588?pdf=render
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Nico Nagelkerke
Vaclav Fidler
spellingShingle Nico Nagelkerke
Vaclav Fidler
Estimating a Logistic Discrimination Functions When One of the Training Samples Is Subject to Misclassification: A Maximum Likelihood Approach.
PLoS ONE
author_facet Nico Nagelkerke
Vaclav Fidler
author_sort Nico Nagelkerke
title Estimating a Logistic Discrimination Functions When One of the Training Samples Is Subject to Misclassification: A Maximum Likelihood Approach.
title_short Estimating a Logistic Discrimination Functions When One of the Training Samples Is Subject to Misclassification: A Maximum Likelihood Approach.
title_full Estimating a Logistic Discrimination Functions When One of the Training Samples Is Subject to Misclassification: A Maximum Likelihood Approach.
title_fullStr Estimating a Logistic Discrimination Functions When One of the Training Samples Is Subject to Misclassification: A Maximum Likelihood Approach.
title_full_unstemmed Estimating a Logistic Discrimination Functions When One of the Training Samples Is Subject to Misclassification: A Maximum Likelihood Approach.
title_sort estimating a logistic discrimination functions when one of the training samples is subject to misclassification: a maximum likelihood approach.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
series PLoS ONE
issn 1932-6203
publishDate 2015-01-01
description The problem of discrimination and classification is central to much of epidemiology. Here we consider the estimation of a logistic regression/discrimination function from training samples, when one of the training samples is subject to misclassification or mislabeling, e.g. diseased individuals are incorrectly classified/labeled as healthy controls. We show that this leads to zero-inflated binomial model with a defective logistic regression or discrimination function, whose parameters can be estimated using standard statistical methods such as maximum likelihood. These parameters can be used to estimate the probability of true group membership among those, possibly erroneously, classified as controls. Two examples are analyzed and discussed. A simulation study explores properties of the maximum likelihood parameter estimates and the estimates of the number of mislabeled observations.
url http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4608588?pdf=render
work_keys_str_mv AT niconagelkerke estimatingalogisticdiscriminationfunctionswhenoneofthetrainingsamplesissubjecttomisclassificationamaximumlikelihoodapproach
AT vaclavfidler estimatingalogisticdiscriminationfunctionswhenoneofthetrainingsamplesissubjecttomisclassificationamaximumlikelihoodapproach
_version_ 1725865565144219648