Diminished acquired equivalence yet good discrimination performance in older participants

We asked younger and older human participants to perform computer-based configural discriminations that were designed to detect acquired equivalence. Both groups solved the discriminations but only the younger participants demonstrated acquired equivalence. The discriminations involved learning the...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Jasper eRobinson
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2013-10-01
Series:Frontiers in Psychology
Subjects:
Online Access:http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00726/full
id doaj-6b577bae299f428abc0acc0a30f42a71
record_format Article
spelling doaj-6b577bae299f428abc0acc0a30f42a712020-11-24T20:49:06ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Psychology1664-10782013-10-01410.3389/fpsyg.2013.0072655575Diminished acquired equivalence yet good discrimination performance in older participantsJasper eRobinson0The University of NottinghamWe asked younger and older human participants to perform computer-based configural discriminations that were designed to detect acquired equivalence. Both groups solved the discriminations but only the younger participants demonstrated acquired equivalence. The discriminations involved learning the preferences (‘like’ [+] or ‘dislike’ [-]) for sports (e.g., tennis [t] and hockey [h]) of four fictitious people (e.g., Alice [A], Beth [B], Charlotte [C] & Dorothy [D]). In one experiment, the discrimination had the form: At+, Bt-, Ct+, Dt-, Ah-, Bh+, Ch-, Dh+. Notice that, e.g., Alice and Charlotte are ‘equivalent’ in liking tennis but disliking hockey. Acquired equivalence was assessed in ancillary components of the discrimination (e.g., by looking at the subsequent rate of ‘whole’ versus ‘partial’ reversal learning). Acquired equivalence is anticipated by a network whose hidden units are shared when inputs (e.g., A and C) signal the same outcome (e.g., +) when accompanied by the same input (t). One interpretation of these results is that there are age-related differences in the mechanisms of configural acquired equivalence.http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00726/fullDiscrimination LearningAgeingattentional setassociative learningConfigural processingconnectionism
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Jasper eRobinson
spellingShingle Jasper eRobinson
Diminished acquired equivalence yet good discrimination performance in older participants
Frontiers in Psychology
Discrimination Learning
Ageing
attentional set
associative learning
Configural processing
connectionism
author_facet Jasper eRobinson
author_sort Jasper eRobinson
title Diminished acquired equivalence yet good discrimination performance in older participants
title_short Diminished acquired equivalence yet good discrimination performance in older participants
title_full Diminished acquired equivalence yet good discrimination performance in older participants
title_fullStr Diminished acquired equivalence yet good discrimination performance in older participants
title_full_unstemmed Diminished acquired equivalence yet good discrimination performance in older participants
title_sort diminished acquired equivalence yet good discrimination performance in older participants
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
series Frontiers in Psychology
issn 1664-1078
publishDate 2013-10-01
description We asked younger and older human participants to perform computer-based configural discriminations that were designed to detect acquired equivalence. Both groups solved the discriminations but only the younger participants demonstrated acquired equivalence. The discriminations involved learning the preferences (‘like’ [+] or ‘dislike’ [-]) for sports (e.g., tennis [t] and hockey [h]) of four fictitious people (e.g., Alice [A], Beth [B], Charlotte [C] & Dorothy [D]). In one experiment, the discrimination had the form: At+, Bt-, Ct+, Dt-, Ah-, Bh+, Ch-, Dh+. Notice that, e.g., Alice and Charlotte are ‘equivalent’ in liking tennis but disliking hockey. Acquired equivalence was assessed in ancillary components of the discrimination (e.g., by looking at the subsequent rate of ‘whole’ versus ‘partial’ reversal learning). Acquired equivalence is anticipated by a network whose hidden units are shared when inputs (e.g., A and C) signal the same outcome (e.g., +) when accompanied by the same input (t). One interpretation of these results is that there are age-related differences in the mechanisms of configural acquired equivalence.
topic Discrimination Learning
Ageing
attentional set
associative learning
Configural processing
connectionism
url http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00726/full
work_keys_str_mv AT jaspererobinson diminishedacquiredequivalenceyetgooddiscriminationperformanceinolderparticipants
_version_ 1716806729704931328