When the selfing process goes wrong: Social-biofeedback, causal mechanisms, and pathological narcissism

In direct opposition to the dominant nativist perspective tracing back to Descartes, William James suggested that the sense of self is constructed through a never-ending process of reflexivity. In more recent years, empirical data from various psychological domains (notably developmental, clinical a...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Cristina Meini
Format: Article
Language:deu
Published: Mimesis Edizioni, Milano 2020-04-01
Series:Rivista Internazionale di Filosofia e Psicologia
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.rifp.it/ojs/index.php/rifp/article/view/rifp.2020.0006/1015
id doaj-6b45f966ef3941f3983024e38054d298
record_format Article
spelling doaj-6b45f966ef3941f3983024e38054d2982020-11-25T02:34:37ZdeuMimesis Edizioni, MilanoRivista Internazionale di Filosofia e Psicologia2039-46672239-26292020-04-0111111312710.4453/rifp.2020.0006When the selfing process goes wrong: Social-biofeedback, causal mechanisms, and pathological narcissismCristina MeiniIn direct opposition to the dominant nativist perspective tracing back to Descartes, William James suggested that the sense of self is constructed through a never-ending process of reflexivity. In more recent years, empirical data from various psychological domains (notably developmental, clinical and social psychology) have further strengthened this constructivist perspective. Notably, Gergely and Watson’s social biofeedback model has been proposed as a central mechanism in the development of emotional introspection, which itself constitutes a crucial step in the process leading to a mature sense of self. In accordance with the social biofeedback model, it has been suggested that reiterated failures in biofeedback mechanisms predispose an individual to mental suffering. While borderline personality disorder and antisocial behavior have received the most attention, here I make a preliminary attempt to examine the impact of dysfunctional biofeedback on the pathogenesis of narcissism, suggesting that some central features of pathological narcissism may result from serious and reiterated disruptions in social biofeedback. This preliminary exploration aims to deepen our understanding of the origins of psychological suffering. In this sense, my effort could contribute to the construction of a causal model going beyond the purely categorical, atheoretical analysis of mental diseases typical of the diagnostic and statistical manuals.https://www.rifp.it/ojs/index.php/rifp/article/view/rifp.2020.0006/1015selfsocial biofeedback modelnarcissismselfing process
collection DOAJ
language deu
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Cristina Meini
spellingShingle Cristina Meini
When the selfing process goes wrong: Social-biofeedback, causal mechanisms, and pathological narcissism
Rivista Internazionale di Filosofia e Psicologia
self
social biofeedback model
narcissism
selfing process
author_facet Cristina Meini
author_sort Cristina Meini
title When the selfing process goes wrong: Social-biofeedback, causal mechanisms, and pathological narcissism
title_short When the selfing process goes wrong: Social-biofeedback, causal mechanisms, and pathological narcissism
title_full When the selfing process goes wrong: Social-biofeedback, causal mechanisms, and pathological narcissism
title_fullStr When the selfing process goes wrong: Social-biofeedback, causal mechanisms, and pathological narcissism
title_full_unstemmed When the selfing process goes wrong: Social-biofeedback, causal mechanisms, and pathological narcissism
title_sort when the selfing process goes wrong: social-biofeedback, causal mechanisms, and pathological narcissism
publisher Mimesis Edizioni, Milano
series Rivista Internazionale di Filosofia e Psicologia
issn 2039-4667
2239-2629
publishDate 2020-04-01
description In direct opposition to the dominant nativist perspective tracing back to Descartes, William James suggested that the sense of self is constructed through a never-ending process of reflexivity. In more recent years, empirical data from various psychological domains (notably developmental, clinical and social psychology) have further strengthened this constructivist perspective. Notably, Gergely and Watson’s social biofeedback model has been proposed as a central mechanism in the development of emotional introspection, which itself constitutes a crucial step in the process leading to a mature sense of self. In accordance with the social biofeedback model, it has been suggested that reiterated failures in biofeedback mechanisms predispose an individual to mental suffering. While borderline personality disorder and antisocial behavior have received the most attention, here I make a preliminary attempt to examine the impact of dysfunctional biofeedback on the pathogenesis of narcissism, suggesting that some central features of pathological narcissism may result from serious and reiterated disruptions in social biofeedback. This preliminary exploration aims to deepen our understanding of the origins of psychological suffering. In this sense, my effort could contribute to the construction of a causal model going beyond the purely categorical, atheoretical analysis of mental diseases typical of the diagnostic and statistical manuals.
topic self
social biofeedback model
narcissism
selfing process
url https://www.rifp.it/ojs/index.php/rifp/article/view/rifp.2020.0006/1015
work_keys_str_mv AT cristinameini whentheselfingprocessgoeswrongsocialbiofeedbackcausalmechanismsandpathologicalnarcissism
_version_ 1724807794462294016