When the selfing process goes wrong: Social-biofeedback, causal mechanisms, and pathological narcissism
In direct opposition to the dominant nativist perspective tracing back to Descartes, William James suggested that the sense of self is constructed through a never-ending process of reflexivity. In more recent years, empirical data from various psychological domains (notably developmental, clinical a...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | deu |
Published: |
Mimesis Edizioni, Milano
2020-04-01
|
Series: | Rivista Internazionale di Filosofia e Psicologia |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.rifp.it/ojs/index.php/rifp/article/view/rifp.2020.0006/1015 |
id |
doaj-6b45f966ef3941f3983024e38054d298 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-6b45f966ef3941f3983024e38054d2982020-11-25T02:34:37ZdeuMimesis Edizioni, MilanoRivista Internazionale di Filosofia e Psicologia2039-46672239-26292020-04-0111111312710.4453/rifp.2020.0006When the selfing process goes wrong: Social-biofeedback, causal mechanisms, and pathological narcissismCristina MeiniIn direct opposition to the dominant nativist perspective tracing back to Descartes, William James suggested that the sense of self is constructed through a never-ending process of reflexivity. In more recent years, empirical data from various psychological domains (notably developmental, clinical and social psychology) have further strengthened this constructivist perspective. Notably, Gergely and Watson’s social biofeedback model has been proposed as a central mechanism in the development of emotional introspection, which itself constitutes a crucial step in the process leading to a mature sense of self. In accordance with the social biofeedback model, it has been suggested that reiterated failures in biofeedback mechanisms predispose an individual to mental suffering. While borderline personality disorder and antisocial behavior have received the most attention, here I make a preliminary attempt to examine the impact of dysfunctional biofeedback on the pathogenesis of narcissism, suggesting that some central features of pathological narcissism may result from serious and reiterated disruptions in social biofeedback. This preliminary exploration aims to deepen our understanding of the origins of psychological suffering. In this sense, my effort could contribute to the construction of a causal model going beyond the purely categorical, atheoretical analysis of mental diseases typical of the diagnostic and statistical manuals.https://www.rifp.it/ojs/index.php/rifp/article/view/rifp.2020.0006/1015selfsocial biofeedback modelnarcissismselfing process |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
deu |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Cristina Meini |
spellingShingle |
Cristina Meini When the selfing process goes wrong: Social-biofeedback, causal mechanisms, and pathological narcissism Rivista Internazionale di Filosofia e Psicologia self social biofeedback model narcissism selfing process |
author_facet |
Cristina Meini |
author_sort |
Cristina Meini |
title |
When the selfing process goes wrong: Social-biofeedback, causal mechanisms, and pathological narcissism |
title_short |
When the selfing process goes wrong: Social-biofeedback, causal mechanisms, and pathological narcissism |
title_full |
When the selfing process goes wrong: Social-biofeedback, causal mechanisms, and pathological narcissism |
title_fullStr |
When the selfing process goes wrong: Social-biofeedback, causal mechanisms, and pathological narcissism |
title_full_unstemmed |
When the selfing process goes wrong: Social-biofeedback, causal mechanisms, and pathological narcissism |
title_sort |
when the selfing process goes wrong: social-biofeedback, causal mechanisms, and pathological narcissism |
publisher |
Mimesis Edizioni, Milano |
series |
Rivista Internazionale di Filosofia e Psicologia |
issn |
2039-4667 2239-2629 |
publishDate |
2020-04-01 |
description |
In direct opposition to the dominant nativist perspective tracing back to Descartes, William James suggested that the sense of self is constructed through a never-ending process of reflexivity. In more recent years, empirical data from various psychological domains (notably developmental, clinical and social psychology) have further strengthened this constructivist perspective. Notably, Gergely and Watson’s social biofeedback model has been proposed as a central mechanism in the development of emotional introspection, which itself constitutes a crucial step in the process leading to a mature sense of self. In accordance with the social biofeedback model, it has been suggested that reiterated failures in biofeedback mechanisms predispose an individual to mental suffering. While borderline personality disorder and antisocial behavior have received the most attention, here I make a preliminary attempt to examine the impact of dysfunctional biofeedback on the pathogenesis of narcissism, suggesting that some central features of pathological narcissism may result from serious and reiterated disruptions in social biofeedback. This preliminary exploration aims to deepen our understanding of the origins of psychological suffering. In this sense, my effort could contribute to the construction of a causal model going beyond the purely categorical, atheoretical analysis of mental diseases typical of the diagnostic and statistical manuals. |
topic |
self social biofeedback model narcissism selfing process |
url |
https://www.rifp.it/ojs/index.php/rifp/article/view/rifp.2020.0006/1015 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT cristinameini whentheselfingprocessgoeswrongsocialbiofeedbackcausalmechanismsandpathologicalnarcissism |
_version_ |
1724807794462294016 |