Die Genitivflexion von artikellos verwendbaren Eigennamen als syntaktisch konditionierte Allomorphie
Based on Eisenberg's (2000) insight that German has four genders instead of three, genitive singular inflection turns out to be driven by gender alone. The concept of inflection classes can be dispensed with for this subject. However, as has been noticed, proper names disturb this clear picture...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | deu |
Published: |
De Gruyter
2006-11-01
|
Series: | Zeitschrift für Sprachwissenschaft |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1515/ZFS.2006.010 |
id |
doaj-6b3725fea2e54257bf56a14058c62e18 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-6b3725fea2e54257bf56a14058c62e182021-09-05T17:41:07ZdeuDe GruyterZeitschrift für Sprachwissenschaft0721-90671613-37062006-11-0125227329910.1515/ZFS.2006.010Die Genitivflexion von artikellos verwendbaren Eigennamen als syntaktisch konditionierte AllomorphieNeef Martin0Seminar für deutsche Sprache und Literatur, Technische Universität, Braunschweig.Based on Eisenberg's (2000) insight that German has four genders instead of three, genitive singular inflection turns out to be driven by gender alone. The concept of inflection classes can be dispensed with for this subject. However, as has been noticed, proper names disturb this clear picture because a subset of female proper names seems to vacillate between zero inflection as is typical of female nouns and s-inflection as is typical of masculine and neuter nouns. On closer inspection, it turns out that the s-marker for female proper names differs significantly from the s-marker for masculine and neuter generic nouns. Moreover, non-female proper names may also show zero inflection in the genitive. In order to analyze these data, I distinguish two distinct classes of proper names: members of the first class of proper names are allowed to appear without an article in contexts where members of the other class need one. I call this first class ‘grammatical proper names’. In genitive singular inflection, grammatical proper names are either zero marked or marked by a specific s-marker. The conditioning factor is whether or not the head position of the DP is filled with a word.https://doi.org/10.1515/ZFS.2006.010genderproper namegenitive inflectionsyntactically conditioned allomorphydeclarative morphologydp |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
deu |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Neef Martin |
spellingShingle |
Neef Martin Die Genitivflexion von artikellos verwendbaren Eigennamen als syntaktisch konditionierte Allomorphie Zeitschrift für Sprachwissenschaft gender proper name genitive inflection syntactically conditioned allomorphy declarative morphology dp |
author_facet |
Neef Martin |
author_sort |
Neef Martin |
title |
Die Genitivflexion von artikellos verwendbaren Eigennamen als syntaktisch konditionierte Allomorphie |
title_short |
Die Genitivflexion von artikellos verwendbaren Eigennamen als syntaktisch konditionierte Allomorphie |
title_full |
Die Genitivflexion von artikellos verwendbaren Eigennamen als syntaktisch konditionierte Allomorphie |
title_fullStr |
Die Genitivflexion von artikellos verwendbaren Eigennamen als syntaktisch konditionierte Allomorphie |
title_full_unstemmed |
Die Genitivflexion von artikellos verwendbaren Eigennamen als syntaktisch konditionierte Allomorphie |
title_sort |
die genitivflexion von artikellos verwendbaren eigennamen als syntaktisch konditionierte allomorphie |
publisher |
De Gruyter |
series |
Zeitschrift für Sprachwissenschaft |
issn |
0721-9067 1613-3706 |
publishDate |
2006-11-01 |
description |
Based on Eisenberg's (2000) insight that German has four genders instead of three, genitive singular inflection turns out to be driven by gender alone. The concept of inflection classes can be dispensed with for this subject. However, as has been noticed, proper names disturb this clear picture because a subset of female proper names seems to vacillate between zero inflection as is typical of female nouns and s-inflection as is typical of masculine and neuter nouns. On closer inspection, it turns out that the s-marker for female proper names differs significantly from the s-marker for masculine and neuter generic nouns. Moreover, non-female proper names may also show zero inflection in the genitive. In order to analyze these data, I distinguish two distinct classes of proper names: members of the first class of proper names are allowed to appear without an article in contexts where members of the other class need one. I call this first class ‘grammatical proper names’. In genitive singular inflection, grammatical proper names are either zero marked or marked by a specific s-marker. The conditioning factor is whether or not the head position of the DP is filled with a word. |
topic |
gender proper name genitive inflection syntactically conditioned allomorphy declarative morphology dp |
url |
https://doi.org/10.1515/ZFS.2006.010 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT neefmartin diegenitivflexionvonartikellosverwendbareneigennamenalssyntaktischkonditionierteallomorphie |
_version_ |
1717786269484843008 |