Die Genitivflexion von artikellos verwendbaren Eigennamen als syntaktisch konditionierte Allomorphie

Based on Eisenberg's (2000) insight that German has four genders instead of three, genitive singular inflection turns out to be driven by gender alone. The concept of inflection classes can be dispensed with for this subject. However, as has been noticed, proper names disturb this clear picture...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Neef Martin
Format: Article
Language:deu
Published: De Gruyter 2006-11-01
Series:Zeitschrift für Sprachwissenschaft
Subjects:
dp
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1515/ZFS.2006.010
id doaj-6b3725fea2e54257bf56a14058c62e18
record_format Article
spelling doaj-6b3725fea2e54257bf56a14058c62e182021-09-05T17:41:07ZdeuDe GruyterZeitschrift für Sprachwissenschaft0721-90671613-37062006-11-0125227329910.1515/ZFS.2006.010Die Genitivflexion von artikellos verwendbaren Eigennamen als syntaktisch konditionierte AllomorphieNeef Martin0Seminar für deutsche Sprache und Literatur, Technische Universität, Braunschweig.Based on Eisenberg's (2000) insight that German has four genders instead of three, genitive singular inflection turns out to be driven by gender alone. The concept of inflection classes can be dispensed with for this subject. However, as has been noticed, proper names disturb this clear picture because a subset of female proper names seems to vacillate between zero inflection as is typical of female nouns and s-inflection as is typical of masculine and neuter nouns. On closer inspection, it turns out that the s-marker for female proper names differs significantly from the s-marker for masculine and neuter generic nouns. Moreover, non-female proper names may also show zero inflection in the genitive. In order to analyze these data, I distinguish two distinct classes of proper names: members of the first class of proper names are allowed to appear without an article in contexts where members of the other class need one. I call this first class ‘grammatical proper names’. In genitive singular inflection, grammatical proper names are either zero marked or marked by a specific s-marker. The conditioning factor is whether or not the head position of the DP is filled with a word.https://doi.org/10.1515/ZFS.2006.010genderproper namegenitive inflectionsyntactically conditioned allomorphydeclarative morphologydp
collection DOAJ
language deu
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Neef Martin
spellingShingle Neef Martin
Die Genitivflexion von artikellos verwendbaren Eigennamen als syntaktisch konditionierte Allomorphie
Zeitschrift für Sprachwissenschaft
gender
proper name
genitive inflection
syntactically conditioned allomorphy
declarative morphology
dp
author_facet Neef Martin
author_sort Neef Martin
title Die Genitivflexion von artikellos verwendbaren Eigennamen als syntaktisch konditionierte Allomorphie
title_short Die Genitivflexion von artikellos verwendbaren Eigennamen als syntaktisch konditionierte Allomorphie
title_full Die Genitivflexion von artikellos verwendbaren Eigennamen als syntaktisch konditionierte Allomorphie
title_fullStr Die Genitivflexion von artikellos verwendbaren Eigennamen als syntaktisch konditionierte Allomorphie
title_full_unstemmed Die Genitivflexion von artikellos verwendbaren Eigennamen als syntaktisch konditionierte Allomorphie
title_sort die genitivflexion von artikellos verwendbaren eigennamen als syntaktisch konditionierte allomorphie
publisher De Gruyter
series Zeitschrift für Sprachwissenschaft
issn 0721-9067
1613-3706
publishDate 2006-11-01
description Based on Eisenberg's (2000) insight that German has four genders instead of three, genitive singular inflection turns out to be driven by gender alone. The concept of inflection classes can be dispensed with for this subject. However, as has been noticed, proper names disturb this clear picture because a subset of female proper names seems to vacillate between zero inflection as is typical of female nouns and s-inflection as is typical of masculine and neuter nouns. On closer inspection, it turns out that the s-marker for female proper names differs significantly from the s-marker for masculine and neuter generic nouns. Moreover, non-female proper names may also show zero inflection in the genitive. In order to analyze these data, I distinguish two distinct classes of proper names: members of the first class of proper names are allowed to appear without an article in contexts where members of the other class need one. I call this first class ‘grammatical proper names’. In genitive singular inflection, grammatical proper names are either zero marked or marked by a specific s-marker. The conditioning factor is whether or not the head position of the DP is filled with a word.
topic gender
proper name
genitive inflection
syntactically conditioned allomorphy
declarative morphology
dp
url https://doi.org/10.1515/ZFS.2006.010
work_keys_str_mv AT neefmartin diegenitivflexionvonartikellosverwendbareneigennamenalssyntaktischkonditionierteallomorphie
_version_ 1717786269484843008