Public Health Unit notifications of hepatitis C and their follow-up in South Western Sydney, Australia

Objective: To determine hepatitis C virus (HCV) treatment rates among those newly diagnosed with the virus in the South Western Sydney Local Health District (SWSLHD) in NSW, Australia. Study type: Cross-sectional study of patients newly diagnosed with HCV in SWSLHD, based on local Public Health U...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Elizabeth R O'Brien, Michelle C Whelan, Tenzin Lama, Miriam Levy
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Sax Institute 2021-09-01
Series:Public Health Research & Practice
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.17061/phrp30342010
id doaj-6b18490a3c2145269091049f6dd5c969
record_format Article
spelling doaj-6b18490a3c2145269091049f6dd5c9692021-09-08T04:31:26ZengSax InstitutePublic Health Research & Practice2204-20912021-09-0131310.17061/phrp30342010Public Health Unit notifications of hepatitis C and their follow-up in South Western Sydney, AustraliaElizabeth R O'Brien 0Michelle C Whelan1Tenzin Lama2Miriam Levy 3Department of Gastroenterology, Campbelltown Hospital, Sydney, NSW, AustraliaDepartment of Gastroenterology, Campbelltown Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia; Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Liverpool Hospital, Sydney, NSW, AustraliaDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Liverpool Hospital, Sydney, NSW, AustraliaDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Liverpool Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia; South Western Sydney Clinical School, UNSW Sydney, AustraliaObjective: To determine hepatitis C virus (HCV) treatment rates among those newly diagnosed with the virus in the South Western Sydney Local Health District (SWSLHD) in NSW, Australia. Study type: Cross-sectional study of patients newly diagnosed with HCV in SWSLHD, based on local Public Health Unit notification data from the second half of 2017. Methods: A total of 200 consecutive notifications were enrolled in the study. Either the ordering clinician was interviewed, and/or data linkage with local hospital records performed, to determine rates of antiviral treatment in this cohort. Outcomes measured included the proportion of patients: started on antiviral treatment; referred to specialists for consideration of treatment; HCV ribonucleic acid (RNA) negative; and lost to follow-up. Descriptive analysis of factors contributing to those lost to follow-up was performed where available. Results: The follow-up outcome of 93% of patients was traced. General Practitioners (GPs) diagnosed a similar number (102) of new HCV cases to those diagnosed by specialists (94). After detecting a patient as HCV antibody positive and confirming active infection, GPs preferred to refer patients to specialists (53%), rather than further evaluate and treat patients themselves (5%). The remainder of cases from the GP-detected group were lost to follow-up (26%), or HCV RNA negative (16%). Among the speciliast-detected patients, 41% were treated, 18% were lost to follow-up, 20% were RNA negative and the remainder were not treated for reasons including a concurrent diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma, or death. The most common reason patients were not started on antiviral treatment was loss to follow-up. Conclusion: We found that less than half (47%) of people in South Western Sydney newly diagnosed with HCV, in whom treatment was indicated, received antiviral medication in the 12 months following diagnosis.This figure excludes the 25% cases referred from general practice to specialists, in whom the treatment status is unknown. Approximately one in five newly diagnosed patients (22%) were lost to follow-up and 18% were RNA negative, indicating they had no active HCV infection.https://doi.org/10.17061/phrp30342010hepatitis c
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Elizabeth R O'Brien
Michelle C Whelan
Tenzin Lama
Miriam Levy
spellingShingle Elizabeth R O'Brien
Michelle C Whelan
Tenzin Lama
Miriam Levy
Public Health Unit notifications of hepatitis C and their follow-up in South Western Sydney, Australia
Public Health Research & Practice
hepatitis c
author_facet Elizabeth R O'Brien
Michelle C Whelan
Tenzin Lama
Miriam Levy
author_sort Elizabeth R O'Brien
title Public Health Unit notifications of hepatitis C and their follow-up in South Western Sydney, Australia
title_short Public Health Unit notifications of hepatitis C and their follow-up in South Western Sydney, Australia
title_full Public Health Unit notifications of hepatitis C and their follow-up in South Western Sydney, Australia
title_fullStr Public Health Unit notifications of hepatitis C and their follow-up in South Western Sydney, Australia
title_full_unstemmed Public Health Unit notifications of hepatitis C and their follow-up in South Western Sydney, Australia
title_sort public health unit notifications of hepatitis c and their follow-up in south western sydney, australia
publisher Sax Institute
series Public Health Research & Practice
issn 2204-2091
publishDate 2021-09-01
description Objective: To determine hepatitis C virus (HCV) treatment rates among those newly diagnosed with the virus in the South Western Sydney Local Health District (SWSLHD) in NSW, Australia. Study type: Cross-sectional study of patients newly diagnosed with HCV in SWSLHD, based on local Public Health Unit notification data from the second half of 2017. Methods: A total of 200 consecutive notifications were enrolled in the study. Either the ordering clinician was interviewed, and/or data linkage with local hospital records performed, to determine rates of antiviral treatment in this cohort. Outcomes measured included the proportion of patients: started on antiviral treatment; referred to specialists for consideration of treatment; HCV ribonucleic acid (RNA) negative; and lost to follow-up. Descriptive analysis of factors contributing to those lost to follow-up was performed where available. Results: The follow-up outcome of 93% of patients was traced. General Practitioners (GPs) diagnosed a similar number (102) of new HCV cases to those diagnosed by specialists (94). After detecting a patient as HCV antibody positive and confirming active infection, GPs preferred to refer patients to specialists (53%), rather than further evaluate and treat patients themselves (5%). The remainder of cases from the GP-detected group were lost to follow-up (26%), or HCV RNA negative (16%). Among the speciliast-detected patients, 41% were treated, 18% were lost to follow-up, 20% were RNA negative and the remainder were not treated for reasons including a concurrent diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma, or death. The most common reason patients were not started on antiviral treatment was loss to follow-up. Conclusion: We found that less than half (47%) of people in South Western Sydney newly diagnosed with HCV, in whom treatment was indicated, received antiviral medication in the 12 months following diagnosis.This figure excludes the 25% cases referred from general practice to specialists, in whom the treatment status is unknown. Approximately one in five newly diagnosed patients (22%) were lost to follow-up and 18% were RNA negative, indicating they had no active HCV infection.
topic hepatitis c
url https://doi.org/10.17061/phrp30342010
work_keys_str_mv AT elizabethrobrien publichealthunitnotificationsofhepatitiscandtheirfollowupinsouthwesternsydneyaustralia
AT michellecwhelan publichealthunitnotificationsofhepatitiscandtheirfollowupinsouthwesternsydneyaustralia
AT tenzinlama publichealthunitnotificationsofhepatitiscandtheirfollowupinsouthwesternsydneyaustralia
AT miriamlevy publichealthunitnotificationsofhepatitiscandtheirfollowupinsouthwesternsydneyaustralia
_version_ 1717762803734937600