Diet Quality and Water Scarcity: Evidence from a Large Australian Population Health Survey

There is widespread interest in dietary strategies that lower environmental impacts. However, various forms of malnutrition are also widely prevalent. In a first study of its kind, we quantify the water-scarcity footprint and diet quality score of a large (>9000) population of self-selected a...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Bradley G. Ridoutt, Danielle Baird, Kimberley Anastasiou, Gilly A. Hendrie
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2019-08-01
Series:Nutrients
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2072-6643/11/8/1846
id doaj-6afac6d911bb423dad1bcd6c563c5a8c
record_format Article
spelling doaj-6afac6d911bb423dad1bcd6c563c5a8c2020-11-24T21:34:29ZengMDPI AGNutrients2072-66432019-08-01118184610.3390/nu11081846nu11081846Diet Quality and Water Scarcity: Evidence from a Large Australian Population Health SurveyBradley G. Ridoutt0Danielle Baird1Kimberley Anastasiou2Gilly A. Hendrie3Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation (CSIRO) Agriculture and Food, Clayton South, VIC 3168, AustraliaCSIRO Health and Biosecurity, Adelaide, SA 5000, AustraliaCSIRO Health and Biosecurity, Adelaide, SA 5000, AustraliaCSIRO Health and Biosecurity, Adelaide, SA 5000, AustraliaThere is widespread interest in dietary strategies that lower environmental impacts. However, various forms of malnutrition are also widely prevalent. In a first study of its kind, we quantify the water-scarcity footprint and diet quality score of a large (>9000) population of self-selected adult daily diets. Here, we show that excessive consumption of discretionary foods—i.e., energy-dense and nutrient-poor foods high in saturated fat, added sugars and salt, and alcohol—contributes up to 36% of the water-scarcity impacts and is the primary factor differentiating healthier diets with lower water-scarcity footprint from poorer quality diets with higher water-scarcity footprint. For core food groups (fruits, vegetables, etc.), large differences in water-scarcity footprint existed between individual foods, making difficult the amendment of dietary guidelines for water-scarcity impact reduction. Very large reductions in dietary water-scarcity footprint are possible, but likely best achieved though technological change, product reformulation and procurement strategies in the agricultural and food industries.https://www.mdpi.com/2072-6643/11/8/1846dietary guidelinesdiscretionary foodlife cycle assessmentsustainable dietsustainable food productionsustainable food systemswater footprintwater use
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Bradley G. Ridoutt
Danielle Baird
Kimberley Anastasiou
Gilly A. Hendrie
spellingShingle Bradley G. Ridoutt
Danielle Baird
Kimberley Anastasiou
Gilly A. Hendrie
Diet Quality and Water Scarcity: Evidence from a Large Australian Population Health Survey
Nutrients
dietary guidelines
discretionary food
life cycle assessment
sustainable diet
sustainable food production
sustainable food systems
water footprint
water use
author_facet Bradley G. Ridoutt
Danielle Baird
Kimberley Anastasiou
Gilly A. Hendrie
author_sort Bradley G. Ridoutt
title Diet Quality and Water Scarcity: Evidence from a Large Australian Population Health Survey
title_short Diet Quality and Water Scarcity: Evidence from a Large Australian Population Health Survey
title_full Diet Quality and Water Scarcity: Evidence from a Large Australian Population Health Survey
title_fullStr Diet Quality and Water Scarcity: Evidence from a Large Australian Population Health Survey
title_full_unstemmed Diet Quality and Water Scarcity: Evidence from a Large Australian Population Health Survey
title_sort diet quality and water scarcity: evidence from a large australian population health survey
publisher MDPI AG
series Nutrients
issn 2072-6643
publishDate 2019-08-01
description There is widespread interest in dietary strategies that lower environmental impacts. However, various forms of malnutrition are also widely prevalent. In a first study of its kind, we quantify the water-scarcity footprint and diet quality score of a large (>9000) population of self-selected adult daily diets. Here, we show that excessive consumption of discretionary foods—i.e., energy-dense and nutrient-poor foods high in saturated fat, added sugars and salt, and alcohol—contributes up to 36% of the water-scarcity impacts and is the primary factor differentiating healthier diets with lower water-scarcity footprint from poorer quality diets with higher water-scarcity footprint. For core food groups (fruits, vegetables, etc.), large differences in water-scarcity footprint existed between individual foods, making difficult the amendment of dietary guidelines for water-scarcity impact reduction. Very large reductions in dietary water-scarcity footprint are possible, but likely best achieved though technological change, product reformulation and procurement strategies in the agricultural and food industries.
topic dietary guidelines
discretionary food
life cycle assessment
sustainable diet
sustainable food production
sustainable food systems
water footprint
water use
url https://www.mdpi.com/2072-6643/11/8/1846
work_keys_str_mv AT bradleygridoutt dietqualityandwaterscarcityevidencefromalargeaustralianpopulationhealthsurvey
AT daniellebaird dietqualityandwaterscarcityevidencefromalargeaustralianpopulationhealthsurvey
AT kimberleyanastasiou dietqualityandwaterscarcityevidencefromalargeaustralianpopulationhealthsurvey
AT gillyahendrie dietqualityandwaterscarcityevidencefromalargeaustralianpopulationhealthsurvey
_version_ 1725949238799499264