Device implantation for patients on antiplatelets and anticoagulants: Use of suction drain

Background and objectives: Cardiovascular implantable electronic devices (CIED) are frequently implanted in patients on anti-thrombotic agents. Pocket hematomas are more likely to occur in these patients. The use of a sterile surgical drain in the pulse generator pocket site could prevent hematomas,...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Sanjeev S. Mukherjee, Daljeet Saggu, Sridevi Chennapragada, Sachin Yalagudri, Sandeep G. Nair, CalamburNarasimhan
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2018-12-01
Series:Indian Heart Journal
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0019483217309501
id doaj-6ae1ee398a304025a670ae73118def65
record_format Article
spelling doaj-6ae1ee398a304025a670ae73118def652020-11-24T20:58:11ZengElsevierIndian Heart Journal0019-48322018-12-0170S389S393Device implantation for patients on antiplatelets and anticoagulants: Use of suction drainSanjeev S. Mukherjee0Daljeet Saggu1Sridevi Chennapragada2Sachin Yalagudri3Sandeep G. Nair4 CalamburNarasimhan5Department of Cardiology, CARE Hospital, Banjara Hills, Hyderabad, IndiaDepartment of Cardiology, CARE Hospital, Banjara Hills, Hyderabad, IndiaDepartment of Cardiology, CARE Hospital, Banjara Hills, Hyderabad, IndiaDepartment of Cardiology, CARE Hospital, Banjara Hills, Hyderabad, IndiaDepartment of Cardiology, CARE Hospital, Banjara Hills, Hyderabad, IndiaCorresponding author at; Department of Cardiology, CARE Hospital, Banjara Hills, Hyderabad, IndiaBackground and objectives: Cardiovascular implantable electronic devices (CIED) are frequently implanted in patients on anti-thrombotic agents. Pocket hematomas are more likely to occur in these patients. The use of a sterile surgical drain in the pulse generator pocket site could prevent hematomas, but fear of infection precludes its use. The objective of the present study is to study the safety and efficacy of surgical drain in patients on antithrombotics undergoing CIED implantations. Methods: This is a single-centre, retrospective study involving patients undergoing CIED implantations on antithrombotics (antiplatelets and anticoagulants) from August 2013 to July 2016. Patients with high risk of thromboembolism were continued on oral antithrombotics or were bridged with heparin after stopping oral antithrombotics. A sterile close wound suction drain was placed in device pockets following CIED implantations. Post procedure, pressure dressing was applied and removed after 12 h once the drain volume was less than 10 ml in 24 h. Results: Sixty seven patients required surgical drain implantation. Major indications for antithrombotic use were presence of intracoronary stent, atrial fibrillation and mechanical valve replacements. The mean post-procedural hospital stay was 3 ± 0.9 days and mean overall drain was 16.6 ± 8.2 ml. At a mean follow up of 17.6 ± 8.2 months, one patient (1.4%) had pocket hematoma. There were no infections. Conclusion: The use of a surgical drain in CIED implantation significantly reduces the risk of hematoma formation without increasing the risk of infection. Antithrombotic drugs can be safely continued at the time of implantation of cardiac devices. Keywords: Pocket hematoma, Antithrombotic treatment, Device implantation, Anticoagulation, Antiplatelets, Surgical drainhttp://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0019483217309501
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Sanjeev S. Mukherjee
Daljeet Saggu
Sridevi Chennapragada
Sachin Yalagudri
Sandeep G. Nair
CalamburNarasimhan
spellingShingle Sanjeev S. Mukherjee
Daljeet Saggu
Sridevi Chennapragada
Sachin Yalagudri
Sandeep G. Nair
CalamburNarasimhan
Device implantation for patients on antiplatelets and anticoagulants: Use of suction drain
Indian Heart Journal
author_facet Sanjeev S. Mukherjee
Daljeet Saggu
Sridevi Chennapragada
Sachin Yalagudri
Sandeep G. Nair
CalamburNarasimhan
author_sort Sanjeev S. Mukherjee
title Device implantation for patients on antiplatelets and anticoagulants: Use of suction drain
title_short Device implantation for patients on antiplatelets and anticoagulants: Use of suction drain
title_full Device implantation for patients on antiplatelets and anticoagulants: Use of suction drain
title_fullStr Device implantation for patients on antiplatelets and anticoagulants: Use of suction drain
title_full_unstemmed Device implantation for patients on antiplatelets and anticoagulants: Use of suction drain
title_sort device implantation for patients on antiplatelets and anticoagulants: use of suction drain
publisher Elsevier
series Indian Heart Journal
issn 0019-4832
publishDate 2018-12-01
description Background and objectives: Cardiovascular implantable electronic devices (CIED) are frequently implanted in patients on anti-thrombotic agents. Pocket hematomas are more likely to occur in these patients. The use of a sterile surgical drain in the pulse generator pocket site could prevent hematomas, but fear of infection precludes its use. The objective of the present study is to study the safety and efficacy of surgical drain in patients on antithrombotics undergoing CIED implantations. Methods: This is a single-centre, retrospective study involving patients undergoing CIED implantations on antithrombotics (antiplatelets and anticoagulants) from August 2013 to July 2016. Patients with high risk of thromboembolism were continued on oral antithrombotics or were bridged with heparin after stopping oral antithrombotics. A sterile close wound suction drain was placed in device pockets following CIED implantations. Post procedure, pressure dressing was applied and removed after 12 h once the drain volume was less than 10 ml in 24 h. Results: Sixty seven patients required surgical drain implantation. Major indications for antithrombotic use were presence of intracoronary stent, atrial fibrillation and mechanical valve replacements. The mean post-procedural hospital stay was 3 ± 0.9 days and mean overall drain was 16.6 ± 8.2 ml. At a mean follow up of 17.6 ± 8.2 months, one patient (1.4%) had pocket hematoma. There were no infections. Conclusion: The use of a surgical drain in CIED implantation significantly reduces the risk of hematoma formation without increasing the risk of infection. Antithrombotic drugs can be safely continued at the time of implantation of cardiac devices. Keywords: Pocket hematoma, Antithrombotic treatment, Device implantation, Anticoagulation, Antiplatelets, Surgical drain
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0019483217309501
work_keys_str_mv AT sanjeevsmukherjee deviceimplantationforpatientsonantiplateletsandanticoagulantsuseofsuctiondrain
AT daljeetsaggu deviceimplantationforpatientsonantiplateletsandanticoagulantsuseofsuctiondrain
AT sridevichennapragada deviceimplantationforpatientsonantiplateletsandanticoagulantsuseofsuctiondrain
AT sachinyalagudri deviceimplantationforpatientsonantiplateletsandanticoagulantsuseofsuctiondrain
AT sandeepgnair deviceimplantationforpatientsonantiplateletsandanticoagulantsuseofsuctiondrain
AT calamburnarasimhan deviceimplantationforpatientsonantiplateletsandanticoagulantsuseofsuctiondrain
_version_ 1716786270151114753