No Statecraft, Questionable Jurisprudence: How the Supreme Court Tried to Kill Senate Reform
In the Senate Reform Reference of 2014, the Supreme Court of Canada declared the Harper government’s proposed reforms to the Canadian Senate unconstitutional. The court ruled that the Federal Government could not legislate non-binding, consultative elections for selecting senators, nor legislate ter...
Main Author: | F.L. Ted Morton |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
University of Calgary
2015-04-01
|
Series: | The School of Public Policy Publications |
Online Access: | https://www.policyschool.ca/wp-content/uploads/2016/03/supreme-court-mortonfinal.pdf |
Similar Items
-
Constitutional Jurisprudence in the Supreme Court of Venezuela
by: Dordelli Rosales, Nelson Richard
Published: (2013) -
Constitutional Jurisprudence in the Supreme Court of Venezuela
by: Dordelli Rosales, Nelson Richard
Published: (2013) -
Forecasting the Senate vote on the Supreme Court vacancy
by: Scott J. Basinger, et al.
Published: (2016-07-01) -
Implications of Indian Supreme Court's Innovations for Environmental Jurisprudence
by: Geetanjoy Sahu
Published: (2008-06-01) -
Problems of divorce in Islamic jurisprudence and Algerian family law, supported by the jurisprudence of the Supreme Court
by: RBIHA ILGHET
Published: (2019-12-01)