RECONFIGURATION OF THE SPECIAL APPEAL: A NECESSARY AND INADIABLE CHANGE
This article analyzes statistical data of the Superior Court of Justice and the content of article 105, subsection III, of the Constitution. The first objective is to prove the correctness of the statement that the STJ suffers from incurable evils, resulting from a gigantic procedural collection. Th...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro
2021-09-01
|
Series: | Revista Eletrônica de Direito Processual |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.e-publicacoes.uerj.br/index.php/redp/article/view/57687/39092 |
id |
doaj-6ad96f163cb24af88781edb68e4b4aa7 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-6ad96f163cb24af88781edb68e4b4aa72021-09-16T15:08:43ZengUniversidade do Estado do Rio de JaneiroRevista Eletrônica de Direito Processual1982-76362021-09-01223288314https://doi.org/10.12957/redp.2021.57687RECONFIGURATION OF THE SPECIAL APPEAL: A NECESSARY AND INADIABLE CHANGEFabio Resende Leal0Universidade Paulista – UNIPThis article analyzes statistical data of the Superior Court of Justice and the content of article 105, subsection III, of the Constitution. The first objective is to prove the correctness of the statement that the STJ suffers from incurable evils, resulting from a gigantic procedural collection. The second objective is to demonstrate that the current rules for the admissibility of the special appeal contribute to the growth of this collection. Finally, the third and main objective is to propose, as a conclusion, textual changes to be made in the Constitution, to optimize and objectify the jurisdiction that the STJ practices when knowing and judging special appeals.https://www.e-publicacoes.uerj.br/index.php/redp/article/view/57687/39092superior court of justicespecial appealadmissibilityrelevance of federal questionobjectification |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Fabio Resende Leal |
spellingShingle |
Fabio Resende Leal RECONFIGURATION OF THE SPECIAL APPEAL: A NECESSARY AND INADIABLE CHANGE Revista Eletrônica de Direito Processual superior court of justice special appeal admissibility relevance of federal question objectification |
author_facet |
Fabio Resende Leal |
author_sort |
Fabio Resende Leal |
title |
RECONFIGURATION OF THE SPECIAL APPEAL: A NECESSARY AND INADIABLE CHANGE |
title_short |
RECONFIGURATION OF THE SPECIAL APPEAL: A NECESSARY AND INADIABLE CHANGE |
title_full |
RECONFIGURATION OF THE SPECIAL APPEAL: A NECESSARY AND INADIABLE CHANGE |
title_fullStr |
RECONFIGURATION OF THE SPECIAL APPEAL: A NECESSARY AND INADIABLE CHANGE |
title_full_unstemmed |
RECONFIGURATION OF THE SPECIAL APPEAL: A NECESSARY AND INADIABLE CHANGE |
title_sort |
reconfiguration of the special appeal: a necessary and inadiable change |
publisher |
Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro |
series |
Revista Eletrônica de Direito Processual |
issn |
1982-7636 |
publishDate |
2021-09-01 |
description |
This article analyzes statistical data of the Superior Court of Justice and the content of article 105, subsection III, of the Constitution. The first objective is to prove the correctness of the statement that the STJ suffers from incurable evils, resulting from a gigantic procedural collection. The second objective is to demonstrate that the current rules for the admissibility of the special appeal contribute to the growth of this collection. Finally, the third and main objective is to propose, as a conclusion, textual changes to be made in the Constitution, to optimize and objectify the jurisdiction that the STJ practices when knowing and judging special appeals. |
topic |
superior court of justice special appeal admissibility relevance of federal question objectification |
url |
https://www.e-publicacoes.uerj.br/index.php/redp/article/view/57687/39092 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT fabioresendeleal reconfigurationofthespecialappealanecessaryandinadiablechange |
_version_ |
1717378156010143744 |