RECONFIGURATION OF THE SPECIAL APPEAL: A NECESSARY AND INADIABLE CHANGE

This article analyzes statistical data of the Superior Court of Justice and the content of article 105, subsection III, of the Constitution. The first objective is to prove the correctness of the statement that the STJ suffers from incurable evils, resulting from a gigantic procedural collection. Th...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Fabio Resende Leal
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro 2021-09-01
Series:Revista Eletrônica de Direito Processual
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.e-publicacoes.uerj.br/index.php/redp/article/view/57687/39092
id doaj-6ad96f163cb24af88781edb68e4b4aa7
record_format Article
spelling doaj-6ad96f163cb24af88781edb68e4b4aa72021-09-16T15:08:43ZengUniversidade do Estado do Rio de JaneiroRevista Eletrônica de Direito Processual1982-76362021-09-01223288314https://doi.org/10.12957/redp.2021.57687RECONFIGURATION OF THE SPECIAL APPEAL: A NECESSARY AND INADIABLE CHANGEFabio Resende Leal0Universidade Paulista – UNIPThis article analyzes statistical data of the Superior Court of Justice and the content of article 105, subsection III, of the Constitution. The first objective is to prove the correctness of the statement that the STJ suffers from incurable evils, resulting from a gigantic procedural collection. The second objective is to demonstrate that the current rules for the admissibility of the special appeal contribute to the growth of this collection. Finally, the third and main objective is to propose, as a conclusion, textual changes to be made in the Constitution, to optimize and objectify the jurisdiction that the STJ practices when knowing and judging special appeals.https://www.e-publicacoes.uerj.br/index.php/redp/article/view/57687/39092superior court of justicespecial appealadmissibilityrelevance of federal questionobjectification
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Fabio Resende Leal
spellingShingle Fabio Resende Leal
RECONFIGURATION OF THE SPECIAL APPEAL: A NECESSARY AND INADIABLE CHANGE
Revista Eletrônica de Direito Processual
superior court of justice
special appeal
admissibility
relevance of federal question
objectification
author_facet Fabio Resende Leal
author_sort Fabio Resende Leal
title RECONFIGURATION OF THE SPECIAL APPEAL: A NECESSARY AND INADIABLE CHANGE
title_short RECONFIGURATION OF THE SPECIAL APPEAL: A NECESSARY AND INADIABLE CHANGE
title_full RECONFIGURATION OF THE SPECIAL APPEAL: A NECESSARY AND INADIABLE CHANGE
title_fullStr RECONFIGURATION OF THE SPECIAL APPEAL: A NECESSARY AND INADIABLE CHANGE
title_full_unstemmed RECONFIGURATION OF THE SPECIAL APPEAL: A NECESSARY AND INADIABLE CHANGE
title_sort reconfiguration of the special appeal: a necessary and inadiable change
publisher Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro
series Revista Eletrônica de Direito Processual
issn 1982-7636
publishDate 2021-09-01
description This article analyzes statistical data of the Superior Court of Justice and the content of article 105, subsection III, of the Constitution. The first objective is to prove the correctness of the statement that the STJ suffers from incurable evils, resulting from a gigantic procedural collection. The second objective is to demonstrate that the current rules for the admissibility of the special appeal contribute to the growth of this collection. Finally, the third and main objective is to propose, as a conclusion, textual changes to be made in the Constitution, to optimize and objectify the jurisdiction that the STJ practices when knowing and judging special appeals.
topic superior court of justice
special appeal
admissibility
relevance of federal question
objectification
url https://www.e-publicacoes.uerj.br/index.php/redp/article/view/57687/39092
work_keys_str_mv AT fabioresendeleal reconfigurationofthespecialappealanecessaryandinadiablechange
_version_ 1717378156010143744