Are Moral Disengagement, Neutralization Techniques, and Self-Serving Cognitive Distortions the Same? Developing a Unified Scale of Moral Neutralization of Aggression

Can the three concepts of Neutralization Techniques, Moral Disengagement, and Secondary Self-Serving Cognitive Distortions be conceived theoretically and empiricallyas capturing the same cognitive processes and thus be measured with one single scale of Moral Neutralization? First, we show how the di...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Denis Ribeaud, Manuel Eisner
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: University of Bielefeld 2010-10-01
Series:International Journal of Conflict and Violence
Online Access:https://www.ijcv.org/index.php/ijcv/article/view/2833
id doaj-6ad6c2e63f1a43f0928f929c073107d0
record_format Article
spelling doaj-6ad6c2e63f1a43f0928f929c073107d02020-11-25T00:29:23ZengUniversity of BielefeldInternational Journal of Conflict and Violence1864-13852010-10-014210.4119/ijcv-2833Are Moral Disengagement, Neutralization Techniques, and Self-Serving Cognitive Distortions the Same? Developing a Unified Scale of Moral Neutralization of AggressionDenis Ribeaud0Manuel Eisner1University of ZurichInstitute of Criminology, University of CambridgeCan the three concepts of Neutralization Techniques, Moral Disengagement, and Secondary Self-Serving Cognitive Distortions be conceived theoretically and empiricallyas capturing the same cognitive processes and thus be measured with one single scale of Moral Neutralization? First, we show how the different approaches overlap conceptually. Second, in Study 1, we verify that four scales derived from the three conceptions of Moral Neutralization are correlated in such a way that they can be conceived as measuring the same phenomenon. Third, building on the results of Study 1, we derive a unified scale of Moral Neutralization which specifically focuses on the neutralization of aggression and test it in a large general population sample of preadolescents (Study 2). Confirmatory factor analyses suggest a good internal consistency and acceptable cross-gender factorial invariance. Correlation analyses with related behavioral and cognitive constructs corroborate the scale’s criterion and convergent validity. In the final section we present a possible integration of Moral Neutralization in a broader framework of crime causation.https://www.ijcv.org/index.php/ijcv/article/view/2833
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Denis Ribeaud
Manuel Eisner
spellingShingle Denis Ribeaud
Manuel Eisner
Are Moral Disengagement, Neutralization Techniques, and Self-Serving Cognitive Distortions the Same? Developing a Unified Scale of Moral Neutralization of Aggression
International Journal of Conflict and Violence
author_facet Denis Ribeaud
Manuel Eisner
author_sort Denis Ribeaud
title Are Moral Disengagement, Neutralization Techniques, and Self-Serving Cognitive Distortions the Same? Developing a Unified Scale of Moral Neutralization of Aggression
title_short Are Moral Disengagement, Neutralization Techniques, and Self-Serving Cognitive Distortions the Same? Developing a Unified Scale of Moral Neutralization of Aggression
title_full Are Moral Disengagement, Neutralization Techniques, and Self-Serving Cognitive Distortions the Same? Developing a Unified Scale of Moral Neutralization of Aggression
title_fullStr Are Moral Disengagement, Neutralization Techniques, and Self-Serving Cognitive Distortions the Same? Developing a Unified Scale of Moral Neutralization of Aggression
title_full_unstemmed Are Moral Disengagement, Neutralization Techniques, and Self-Serving Cognitive Distortions the Same? Developing a Unified Scale of Moral Neutralization of Aggression
title_sort are moral disengagement, neutralization techniques, and self-serving cognitive distortions the same? developing a unified scale of moral neutralization of aggression
publisher University of Bielefeld
series International Journal of Conflict and Violence
issn 1864-1385
publishDate 2010-10-01
description Can the three concepts of Neutralization Techniques, Moral Disengagement, and Secondary Self-Serving Cognitive Distortions be conceived theoretically and empiricallyas capturing the same cognitive processes and thus be measured with one single scale of Moral Neutralization? First, we show how the different approaches overlap conceptually. Second, in Study 1, we verify that four scales derived from the three conceptions of Moral Neutralization are correlated in such a way that they can be conceived as measuring the same phenomenon. Third, building on the results of Study 1, we derive a unified scale of Moral Neutralization which specifically focuses on the neutralization of aggression and test it in a large general population sample of preadolescents (Study 2). Confirmatory factor analyses suggest a good internal consistency and acceptable cross-gender factorial invariance. Correlation analyses with related behavioral and cognitive constructs corroborate the scale’s criterion and convergent validity. In the final section we present a possible integration of Moral Neutralization in a broader framework of crime causation.
url https://www.ijcv.org/index.php/ijcv/article/view/2833
work_keys_str_mv AT denisribeaud aremoraldisengagementneutralizationtechniquesandselfservingcognitivedistortionsthesamedevelopingaunifiedscaleofmoralneutralizationofaggression
AT manueleisner aremoraldisengagementneutralizationtechniquesandselfservingcognitivedistortionsthesamedevelopingaunifiedscaleofmoralneutralizationofaggression
_version_ 1725331597247381504