Causes of Judicial Control over the Disciplinary Administrative Acts Issued by the Regional Commissions of the Attorney General’s Office in Tolima and Cundinamarca
The Jurisdicción de lo Contencioso Administrativo (Administrative Contentious Jurisdiction or Judicial Jurisdiction) can exercise control over punitive administrative actions issued by Attorney General’s Office, its regional commissions or other agents through a means of control called annulment and...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | Spanish |
| Published: |
Universidad Santo Tomás
2015-12-01
|
| Series: | Via Inveniendi Et Iudicandi |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://revistas.usantotomas.edu.co/index.php/viei/article/view/2449 |
| Summary: | The Jurisdicción de lo Contencioso Administrativo (Administrative Contentious
Jurisdiction or Judicial Jurisdiction) can exercise control over punitive administrative
actions issued by Attorney General’s Office, its regional commissions or other agents
through a means of control called annulment and right restoration. However, this
procedural instrument is not always effectively used because there is a lack of knowledge
regarding how to invoke properly causes for annulment of the act that motivates its judicial
exercise. This lack of legal capacity may lead the disciplined to fail achieving a favorable
court decision. To help solve this problem, a literature review and an investigation of
the descriptive and interpretative were made. In this study, disciplinary sanctions issued
by regional attorneys of Tolima and Cundinamarca were analyzed qualitatively and
quantitatively. Specifically, this investigation examined the causes for conducting a judicial
review of disciplinary actions emanated from these two regional attorney’s offices. The
results of these investigative efforts are presented in this article. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 1909-0528 1909-0528 |