The Use of Digital Microscopy to Compare the Thicknesses of Normal Corneas and Ex Vivo Rejected Corneal Grafts with a Focus on the Descemet’s Membrane

Objective. To compare the thickness of corneal layers, specifically the Descemet’s membrane (DM), in normal corneas and in failed grafts due to rejection (FGRs) using the digital histopathology and to propose a model for the measurement of corneal layers using this method. Methods. This is a prospec...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Taíse Tognon, Sabrina Bergeron, Christina Mastromonaco, Kleyton Barella, Adriano Pasqualotti, Laura Nunez, Francisco Murta, Luciene Barbosa de Sousa, Mauro Campos, Miguel Noel Nascentes Burnier
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Hindawi Limited 2019-01-01
Series:Journal of Ophthalmology
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2019/8283175
id doaj-6a9aaf02b5af41a8925518c96b00bac3
record_format Article
spelling doaj-6a9aaf02b5af41a8925518c96b00bac32020-11-24T23:51:06ZengHindawi LimitedJournal of Ophthalmology2090-004X2090-00582019-01-01201910.1155/2019/82831758283175The Use of Digital Microscopy to Compare the Thicknesses of Normal Corneas and Ex Vivo Rejected Corneal Grafts with a Focus on the Descemet’s MembraneTaíse Tognon0Sabrina Bergeron1Christina Mastromonaco2Kleyton Barella3Adriano Pasqualotti4Laura Nunez5Francisco Murta6Luciene Barbosa de Sousa7Mauro Campos8Miguel Noel Nascentes Burnier9Federal University of São Paulo, MUHC–McGill University Ocular Pathology & Translational Research Laboratory, Penido Burnier Institute, Campinas, BrazilMUHC–McGill University Ocular Pathology & Translational Research Laboratory, Montreal, CanadaMUHC–McGill University Ocular Pathology & Translational Research Laboratory, Montreal, CanadaPenido Burnier Institute, Campinas, BrazilUniversity of Passo Fundo, Lisbon University, Passo Fundo, BrazilUniversité de Montréal, MUHC–McGill University Ocular Pathology & Translational Research Laboratory, Montreal, CanadaLisbon University, The MUHC–McGill University Ocular Pathology & Translational Research Laboratory, Lisbon, PortugalFederal University of São Paulo, Goiás Eye Bank, São Paulo, BrazilFederal University of São Paulo, São Paulo, BrazilMUHC–McGill University Ocular Pathology & Translational Research Laboratory, Federal University of São Paulo, Montreal, CanadaObjective. To compare the thickness of corneal layers, specifically the Descemet’s membrane (DM), in normal corneas and in failed grafts due to rejection (FGRs) using the digital histopathology and to propose a model for the measurement of corneal layers using this method. Methods. This is a prospective, cross-sectional study performed at the MUHC-McGill University Ocular Pathology & Translational Research Laboratory (McGill University, Montreal, Canada). Histopathological sections of 25 normal human corneas and 40 FGRs were fully digitalized and examined. Inclusion criteria: samples diagnosed as normal corneas or FGRs, from patients older than 18 years of age. Exclusion criteria: histopathological sections without adequate tissue or missing epidemiological information. For each sample, the thicknesses of the epithelium, stroma, and DM were acquired. From a perpendicular plane of reference, two central measurements and two nasal and two temporal peripheral measurements were obtained. Results. There were differences between the normal and FGR groups in the mean central thickness of the epithelium (p<0.001), the nasal and temporal stromal regions (p<0.001), and of the DM in the nasal and temporal regions (p<0.001). Compared with the extremities of the sample (nasal and temporal), the mean thickness of the DM in normal corneas was lower in the central region (p<0.001), and this difference was not found in the FGR group. Conclusions. Normal corneas have a thinner epithelium in the central region than the FGR group. In addition, the stroma and DM thicknesses of the nasal and temporal periphery were significantly higher in normal corneas than in those from the FGR group. The digital microscopy protocol applied in this study may be useful for further research studies regarding cornea and other tissues.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2019/8283175
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Taíse Tognon
Sabrina Bergeron
Christina Mastromonaco
Kleyton Barella
Adriano Pasqualotti
Laura Nunez
Francisco Murta
Luciene Barbosa de Sousa
Mauro Campos
Miguel Noel Nascentes Burnier
spellingShingle Taíse Tognon
Sabrina Bergeron
Christina Mastromonaco
Kleyton Barella
Adriano Pasqualotti
Laura Nunez
Francisco Murta
Luciene Barbosa de Sousa
Mauro Campos
Miguel Noel Nascentes Burnier
The Use of Digital Microscopy to Compare the Thicknesses of Normal Corneas and Ex Vivo Rejected Corneal Grafts with a Focus on the Descemet’s Membrane
Journal of Ophthalmology
author_facet Taíse Tognon
Sabrina Bergeron
Christina Mastromonaco
Kleyton Barella
Adriano Pasqualotti
Laura Nunez
Francisco Murta
Luciene Barbosa de Sousa
Mauro Campos
Miguel Noel Nascentes Burnier
author_sort Taíse Tognon
title The Use of Digital Microscopy to Compare the Thicknesses of Normal Corneas and Ex Vivo Rejected Corneal Grafts with a Focus on the Descemet’s Membrane
title_short The Use of Digital Microscopy to Compare the Thicknesses of Normal Corneas and Ex Vivo Rejected Corneal Grafts with a Focus on the Descemet’s Membrane
title_full The Use of Digital Microscopy to Compare the Thicknesses of Normal Corneas and Ex Vivo Rejected Corneal Grafts with a Focus on the Descemet’s Membrane
title_fullStr The Use of Digital Microscopy to Compare the Thicknesses of Normal Corneas and Ex Vivo Rejected Corneal Grafts with a Focus on the Descemet’s Membrane
title_full_unstemmed The Use of Digital Microscopy to Compare the Thicknesses of Normal Corneas and Ex Vivo Rejected Corneal Grafts with a Focus on the Descemet’s Membrane
title_sort use of digital microscopy to compare the thicknesses of normal corneas and ex vivo rejected corneal grafts with a focus on the descemet’s membrane
publisher Hindawi Limited
series Journal of Ophthalmology
issn 2090-004X
2090-0058
publishDate 2019-01-01
description Objective. To compare the thickness of corneal layers, specifically the Descemet’s membrane (DM), in normal corneas and in failed grafts due to rejection (FGRs) using the digital histopathology and to propose a model for the measurement of corneal layers using this method. Methods. This is a prospective, cross-sectional study performed at the MUHC-McGill University Ocular Pathology & Translational Research Laboratory (McGill University, Montreal, Canada). Histopathological sections of 25 normal human corneas and 40 FGRs were fully digitalized and examined. Inclusion criteria: samples diagnosed as normal corneas or FGRs, from patients older than 18 years of age. Exclusion criteria: histopathological sections without adequate tissue or missing epidemiological information. For each sample, the thicknesses of the epithelium, stroma, and DM were acquired. From a perpendicular plane of reference, two central measurements and two nasal and two temporal peripheral measurements were obtained. Results. There were differences between the normal and FGR groups in the mean central thickness of the epithelium (p<0.001), the nasal and temporal stromal regions (p<0.001), and of the DM in the nasal and temporal regions (p<0.001). Compared with the extremities of the sample (nasal and temporal), the mean thickness of the DM in normal corneas was lower in the central region (p<0.001), and this difference was not found in the FGR group. Conclusions. Normal corneas have a thinner epithelium in the central region than the FGR group. In addition, the stroma and DM thicknesses of the nasal and temporal periphery were significantly higher in normal corneas than in those from the FGR group. The digital microscopy protocol applied in this study may be useful for further research studies regarding cornea and other tissues.
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2019/8283175
work_keys_str_mv AT taisetognon theuseofdigitalmicroscopytocomparethethicknessesofnormalcorneasandexvivorejectedcornealgraftswithafocusonthedescemetsmembrane
AT sabrinabergeron theuseofdigitalmicroscopytocomparethethicknessesofnormalcorneasandexvivorejectedcornealgraftswithafocusonthedescemetsmembrane
AT christinamastromonaco theuseofdigitalmicroscopytocomparethethicknessesofnormalcorneasandexvivorejectedcornealgraftswithafocusonthedescemetsmembrane
AT kleytonbarella theuseofdigitalmicroscopytocomparethethicknessesofnormalcorneasandexvivorejectedcornealgraftswithafocusonthedescemetsmembrane
AT adrianopasqualotti theuseofdigitalmicroscopytocomparethethicknessesofnormalcorneasandexvivorejectedcornealgraftswithafocusonthedescemetsmembrane
AT lauranunez theuseofdigitalmicroscopytocomparethethicknessesofnormalcorneasandexvivorejectedcornealgraftswithafocusonthedescemetsmembrane
AT franciscomurta theuseofdigitalmicroscopytocomparethethicknessesofnormalcorneasandexvivorejectedcornealgraftswithafocusonthedescemetsmembrane
AT lucienebarbosadesousa theuseofdigitalmicroscopytocomparethethicknessesofnormalcorneasandexvivorejectedcornealgraftswithafocusonthedescemetsmembrane
AT maurocampos theuseofdigitalmicroscopytocomparethethicknessesofnormalcorneasandexvivorejectedcornealgraftswithafocusonthedescemetsmembrane
AT miguelnoelnascentesburnier theuseofdigitalmicroscopytocomparethethicknessesofnormalcorneasandexvivorejectedcornealgraftswithafocusonthedescemetsmembrane
AT taisetognon useofdigitalmicroscopytocomparethethicknessesofnormalcorneasandexvivorejectedcornealgraftswithafocusonthedescemetsmembrane
AT sabrinabergeron useofdigitalmicroscopytocomparethethicknessesofnormalcorneasandexvivorejectedcornealgraftswithafocusonthedescemetsmembrane
AT christinamastromonaco useofdigitalmicroscopytocomparethethicknessesofnormalcorneasandexvivorejectedcornealgraftswithafocusonthedescemetsmembrane
AT kleytonbarella useofdigitalmicroscopytocomparethethicknessesofnormalcorneasandexvivorejectedcornealgraftswithafocusonthedescemetsmembrane
AT adrianopasqualotti useofdigitalmicroscopytocomparethethicknessesofnormalcorneasandexvivorejectedcornealgraftswithafocusonthedescemetsmembrane
AT lauranunez useofdigitalmicroscopytocomparethethicknessesofnormalcorneasandexvivorejectedcornealgraftswithafocusonthedescemetsmembrane
AT franciscomurta useofdigitalmicroscopytocomparethethicknessesofnormalcorneasandexvivorejectedcornealgraftswithafocusonthedescemetsmembrane
AT lucienebarbosadesousa useofdigitalmicroscopytocomparethethicknessesofnormalcorneasandexvivorejectedcornealgraftswithafocusonthedescemetsmembrane
AT maurocampos useofdigitalmicroscopytocomparethethicknessesofnormalcorneasandexvivorejectedcornealgraftswithafocusonthedescemetsmembrane
AT miguelnoelnascentesburnier useofdigitalmicroscopytocomparethethicknessesofnormalcorneasandexvivorejectedcornealgraftswithafocusonthedescemetsmembrane
_version_ 1725477546475126784