Essay Review: Evidence-Based Analysis of the COVID Pandemic

This short book suggests plausible answers to much of what has seemed inexplicable or unbelievable about what governments, the World Health Organization, and popular media have disseminated about the officially declared global pandemic. The author is a recently graduated Swedish physician who re...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Henry Bauer
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SSE 2021-09-01
Series:Journal of Scientific Exploration
Online Access:http://journalofscientificexploration.org/index.php/jse/article/view/2157
id doaj-6a896454471e40d882a4a30dad87ddd4
record_format Article
spelling doaj-6a896454471e40d882a4a30dad87ddd42021-09-28T04:14:49ZengSSEJournal of Scientific Exploration0892-33102021-09-0135310.31275/20212157Essay Review: Evidence-Based Analysis of the COVID PandemicHenry Bauer This short book suggests plausible answers to much of what has seemed inexplicable or unbelievable about what governments, the World Health Organization, and popular media have disseminated about the officially declared global pandemic. The author is a recently graduated Swedish physician who recognized even during his training that many of the generally accepted shibboleths about medical matters are not evidence-based; are often, in fact, contrary to the available evidence. Irrespective of his suggestions about COVID, several points in this book are important for everyone to know: • Modern medicine focuses on the handling of emergencies but says “extremely little about how to avoid chronic disease and maximize long term health” (p. 7). • More than half of the widely accepted recommendations about nutrition are nonsense, without any basis in solid evidence (p. 8): to eat more fruit, fish, vegetables, whole-grain cereals, and less salt, saturated fat, or meat. • Much purportedly scientific medical information stems from inappropriate use of surrogate endpoints and improper statistical analyses (pp. 34–39): The usual criterion for statistical significance (p ≤ 0.05) is arbitrary and very weak. The typical marketing ploy of citing relative rather than absolute risks is highly misleading (pp. 40–46). How deadly is COVID? http://journalofscientificexploration.org/index.php/jse/article/view/2157
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Henry Bauer
spellingShingle Henry Bauer
Essay Review: Evidence-Based Analysis of the COVID Pandemic
Journal of Scientific Exploration
author_facet Henry Bauer
author_sort Henry Bauer
title Essay Review: Evidence-Based Analysis of the COVID Pandemic
title_short Essay Review: Evidence-Based Analysis of the COVID Pandemic
title_full Essay Review: Evidence-Based Analysis of the COVID Pandemic
title_fullStr Essay Review: Evidence-Based Analysis of the COVID Pandemic
title_full_unstemmed Essay Review: Evidence-Based Analysis of the COVID Pandemic
title_sort essay review: evidence-based analysis of the covid pandemic
publisher SSE
series Journal of Scientific Exploration
issn 0892-3310
publishDate 2021-09-01
description This short book suggests plausible answers to much of what has seemed inexplicable or unbelievable about what governments, the World Health Organization, and popular media have disseminated about the officially declared global pandemic. The author is a recently graduated Swedish physician who recognized even during his training that many of the generally accepted shibboleths about medical matters are not evidence-based; are often, in fact, contrary to the available evidence. Irrespective of his suggestions about COVID, several points in this book are important for everyone to know: • Modern medicine focuses on the handling of emergencies but says “extremely little about how to avoid chronic disease and maximize long term health” (p. 7). • More than half of the widely accepted recommendations about nutrition are nonsense, without any basis in solid evidence (p. 8): to eat more fruit, fish, vegetables, whole-grain cereals, and less salt, saturated fat, or meat. • Much purportedly scientific medical information stems from inappropriate use of surrogate endpoints and improper statistical analyses (pp. 34–39): The usual criterion for statistical significance (p ≤ 0.05) is arbitrary and very weak. The typical marketing ploy of citing relative rather than absolute risks is highly misleading (pp. 40–46). How deadly is COVID?
url http://journalofscientificexploration.org/index.php/jse/article/view/2157
work_keys_str_mv AT henrybauer essayreviewevidencebasedanalysisofthecovidpandemic
_version_ 1716866484038270976