Biomarkers and Stimulation Algorithms for Adaptive Brain Stimulation
The goal of this review is to describe in what ways feedback or adaptive stimulation may be delivered and adjusted based on relevant biomarkers. Specific treatment mechanisms underlying therapeutic brain stimulation remain unclear, in spite of the demonstrated efficacy in a number of nervous system...
Main Authors: | , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2017-10-01
|
Series: | Frontiers in Neuroscience |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://journal.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fnins.2017.00564/full |
id |
doaj-6a85baff1fe5471ca4dbfbbf7b3182b2 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-6a85baff1fe5471ca4dbfbbf7b3182b22020-11-24T22:45:47ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Neuroscience1662-453X2017-10-011110.3389/fnins.2017.00564303295Biomarkers and Stimulation Algorithms for Adaptive Brain StimulationKimberly B. Hoang0Isaac R. Cassar1Warren M. Grill2Warren M. Grill3Warren M. Grill4Dennis A. Turner5Dennis A. Turner6Department of Neurosurgery, Duke University, Durham, NC, United StatesDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Duke University, Durham, NC, United StatesDepartment of Neurosurgery, Duke University, Durham, NC, United StatesDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Duke University, Durham, NC, United StatesDepartment of Neurobiology, Duke University Medical Center, Duke University, Durham, NC, United StatesDepartment of Neurosurgery, Duke University, Durham, NC, United StatesDepartment of Neurobiology, Duke University Medical Center, Duke University, Durham, NC, United StatesThe goal of this review is to describe in what ways feedback or adaptive stimulation may be delivered and adjusted based on relevant biomarkers. Specific treatment mechanisms underlying therapeutic brain stimulation remain unclear, in spite of the demonstrated efficacy in a number of nervous system diseases. Brain stimulation appears to exert widespread influence over specific neural networks that are relevant to specific disease entities. In awake patients, activation or suppression of these neural networks can be assessed by either symptom alleviation (i.e., tremor, rigidity, seizures) or physiological criteria, which may be predictive of expected symptomatic treatment. Secondary verification of network activation through specific biomarkers that are linked to symptomatic disease improvement may be useful for several reasons. For example, these biomarkers could aid optimal intraoperative localization, possibly improve efficacy or efficiency (i.e., reduced power needs), and provide long-term adaptive automatic adjustment of stimulation parameters. Possible biomarkers for use in portable or implanted devices span from ongoing physiological brain activity, evoked local field potentials (LFPs), and intermittent pathological activity, to wearable devices, biochemical, blood flow, optical, or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) changes, temperature changes, or optogenetic signals. First, however, potential biomarkers must be correlated directly with symptom or disease treatment and network activation. Although numerous biomarkers are under consideration for a variety of stimulation indications the feasibility of these approaches has yet to be fully determined. Particularly, there are critical questions whether the use of adaptive systems can improve efficacy over continuous stimulation, facilitate adjustment of stimulation interventions and improve our understanding of the role of abnormal network function in disease mechanisms.http://journal.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fnins.2017.00564/fulldeep brain stimulationepilepsyParkinson's diseaseresponsive brain stimulationbeta hypersynchronyphase amplitude coupling |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Kimberly B. Hoang Isaac R. Cassar Warren M. Grill Warren M. Grill Warren M. Grill Dennis A. Turner Dennis A. Turner |
spellingShingle |
Kimberly B. Hoang Isaac R. Cassar Warren M. Grill Warren M. Grill Warren M. Grill Dennis A. Turner Dennis A. Turner Biomarkers and Stimulation Algorithms for Adaptive Brain Stimulation Frontiers in Neuroscience deep brain stimulation epilepsy Parkinson's disease responsive brain stimulation beta hypersynchrony phase amplitude coupling |
author_facet |
Kimberly B. Hoang Isaac R. Cassar Warren M. Grill Warren M. Grill Warren M. Grill Dennis A. Turner Dennis A. Turner |
author_sort |
Kimberly B. Hoang |
title |
Biomarkers and Stimulation Algorithms for Adaptive Brain Stimulation |
title_short |
Biomarkers and Stimulation Algorithms for Adaptive Brain Stimulation |
title_full |
Biomarkers and Stimulation Algorithms for Adaptive Brain Stimulation |
title_fullStr |
Biomarkers and Stimulation Algorithms for Adaptive Brain Stimulation |
title_full_unstemmed |
Biomarkers and Stimulation Algorithms for Adaptive Brain Stimulation |
title_sort |
biomarkers and stimulation algorithms for adaptive brain stimulation |
publisher |
Frontiers Media S.A. |
series |
Frontiers in Neuroscience |
issn |
1662-453X |
publishDate |
2017-10-01 |
description |
The goal of this review is to describe in what ways feedback or adaptive stimulation may be delivered and adjusted based on relevant biomarkers. Specific treatment mechanisms underlying therapeutic brain stimulation remain unclear, in spite of the demonstrated efficacy in a number of nervous system diseases. Brain stimulation appears to exert widespread influence over specific neural networks that are relevant to specific disease entities. In awake patients, activation or suppression of these neural networks can be assessed by either symptom alleviation (i.e., tremor, rigidity, seizures) or physiological criteria, which may be predictive of expected symptomatic treatment. Secondary verification of network activation through specific biomarkers that are linked to symptomatic disease improvement may be useful for several reasons. For example, these biomarkers could aid optimal intraoperative localization, possibly improve efficacy or efficiency (i.e., reduced power needs), and provide long-term adaptive automatic adjustment of stimulation parameters. Possible biomarkers for use in portable or implanted devices span from ongoing physiological brain activity, evoked local field potentials (LFPs), and intermittent pathological activity, to wearable devices, biochemical, blood flow, optical, or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) changes, temperature changes, or optogenetic signals. First, however, potential biomarkers must be correlated directly with symptom or disease treatment and network activation. Although numerous biomarkers are under consideration for a variety of stimulation indications the feasibility of these approaches has yet to be fully determined. Particularly, there are critical questions whether the use of adaptive systems can improve efficacy over continuous stimulation, facilitate adjustment of stimulation interventions and improve our understanding of the role of abnormal network function in disease mechanisms. |
topic |
deep brain stimulation epilepsy Parkinson's disease responsive brain stimulation beta hypersynchrony phase amplitude coupling |
url |
http://journal.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fnins.2017.00564/full |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT kimberlybhoang biomarkersandstimulationalgorithmsforadaptivebrainstimulation AT isaacrcassar biomarkersandstimulationalgorithmsforadaptivebrainstimulation AT warrenmgrill biomarkersandstimulationalgorithmsforadaptivebrainstimulation AT warrenmgrill biomarkersandstimulationalgorithmsforadaptivebrainstimulation AT warrenmgrill biomarkersandstimulationalgorithmsforadaptivebrainstimulation AT dennisaturner biomarkersandstimulationalgorithmsforadaptivebrainstimulation AT dennisaturner biomarkersandstimulationalgorithmsforadaptivebrainstimulation |
_version_ |
1725687518613995520 |