Biomarkers and Stimulation Algorithms for Adaptive Brain Stimulation

The goal of this review is to describe in what ways feedback or adaptive stimulation may be delivered and adjusted based on relevant biomarkers. Specific treatment mechanisms underlying therapeutic brain stimulation remain unclear, in spite of the demonstrated efficacy in a number of nervous system...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Kimberly B. Hoang, Isaac R. Cassar, Warren M. Grill, Dennis A. Turner
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2017-10-01
Series:Frontiers in Neuroscience
Subjects:
Online Access:http://journal.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fnins.2017.00564/full
id doaj-6a85baff1fe5471ca4dbfbbf7b3182b2
record_format Article
spelling doaj-6a85baff1fe5471ca4dbfbbf7b3182b22020-11-24T22:45:47ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Neuroscience1662-453X2017-10-011110.3389/fnins.2017.00564303295Biomarkers and Stimulation Algorithms for Adaptive Brain StimulationKimberly B. Hoang0Isaac R. Cassar1Warren M. Grill2Warren M. Grill3Warren M. Grill4Dennis A. Turner5Dennis A. Turner6Department of Neurosurgery, Duke University, Durham, NC, United StatesDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Duke University, Durham, NC, United StatesDepartment of Neurosurgery, Duke University, Durham, NC, United StatesDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Duke University, Durham, NC, United StatesDepartment of Neurobiology, Duke University Medical Center, Duke University, Durham, NC, United StatesDepartment of Neurosurgery, Duke University, Durham, NC, United StatesDepartment of Neurobiology, Duke University Medical Center, Duke University, Durham, NC, United StatesThe goal of this review is to describe in what ways feedback or adaptive stimulation may be delivered and adjusted based on relevant biomarkers. Specific treatment mechanisms underlying therapeutic brain stimulation remain unclear, in spite of the demonstrated efficacy in a number of nervous system diseases. Brain stimulation appears to exert widespread influence over specific neural networks that are relevant to specific disease entities. In awake patients, activation or suppression of these neural networks can be assessed by either symptom alleviation (i.e., tremor, rigidity, seizures) or physiological criteria, which may be predictive of expected symptomatic treatment. Secondary verification of network activation through specific biomarkers that are linked to symptomatic disease improvement may be useful for several reasons. For example, these biomarkers could aid optimal intraoperative localization, possibly improve efficacy or efficiency (i.e., reduced power needs), and provide long-term adaptive automatic adjustment of stimulation parameters. Possible biomarkers for use in portable or implanted devices span from ongoing physiological brain activity, evoked local field potentials (LFPs), and intermittent pathological activity, to wearable devices, biochemical, blood flow, optical, or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) changes, temperature changes, or optogenetic signals. First, however, potential biomarkers must be correlated directly with symptom or disease treatment and network activation. Although numerous biomarkers are under consideration for a variety of stimulation indications the feasibility of these approaches has yet to be fully determined. Particularly, there are critical questions whether the use of adaptive systems can improve efficacy over continuous stimulation, facilitate adjustment of stimulation interventions and improve our understanding of the role of abnormal network function in disease mechanisms.http://journal.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fnins.2017.00564/fulldeep brain stimulationepilepsyParkinson's diseaseresponsive brain stimulationbeta hypersynchronyphase amplitude coupling
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Kimberly B. Hoang
Isaac R. Cassar
Warren M. Grill
Warren M. Grill
Warren M. Grill
Dennis A. Turner
Dennis A. Turner
spellingShingle Kimberly B. Hoang
Isaac R. Cassar
Warren M. Grill
Warren M. Grill
Warren M. Grill
Dennis A. Turner
Dennis A. Turner
Biomarkers and Stimulation Algorithms for Adaptive Brain Stimulation
Frontiers in Neuroscience
deep brain stimulation
epilepsy
Parkinson's disease
responsive brain stimulation
beta hypersynchrony
phase amplitude coupling
author_facet Kimberly B. Hoang
Isaac R. Cassar
Warren M. Grill
Warren M. Grill
Warren M. Grill
Dennis A. Turner
Dennis A. Turner
author_sort Kimberly B. Hoang
title Biomarkers and Stimulation Algorithms for Adaptive Brain Stimulation
title_short Biomarkers and Stimulation Algorithms for Adaptive Brain Stimulation
title_full Biomarkers and Stimulation Algorithms for Adaptive Brain Stimulation
title_fullStr Biomarkers and Stimulation Algorithms for Adaptive Brain Stimulation
title_full_unstemmed Biomarkers and Stimulation Algorithms for Adaptive Brain Stimulation
title_sort biomarkers and stimulation algorithms for adaptive brain stimulation
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
series Frontiers in Neuroscience
issn 1662-453X
publishDate 2017-10-01
description The goal of this review is to describe in what ways feedback or adaptive stimulation may be delivered and adjusted based on relevant biomarkers. Specific treatment mechanisms underlying therapeutic brain stimulation remain unclear, in spite of the demonstrated efficacy in a number of nervous system diseases. Brain stimulation appears to exert widespread influence over specific neural networks that are relevant to specific disease entities. In awake patients, activation or suppression of these neural networks can be assessed by either symptom alleviation (i.e., tremor, rigidity, seizures) or physiological criteria, which may be predictive of expected symptomatic treatment. Secondary verification of network activation through specific biomarkers that are linked to symptomatic disease improvement may be useful for several reasons. For example, these biomarkers could aid optimal intraoperative localization, possibly improve efficacy or efficiency (i.e., reduced power needs), and provide long-term adaptive automatic adjustment of stimulation parameters. Possible biomarkers for use in portable or implanted devices span from ongoing physiological brain activity, evoked local field potentials (LFPs), and intermittent pathological activity, to wearable devices, biochemical, blood flow, optical, or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) changes, temperature changes, or optogenetic signals. First, however, potential biomarkers must be correlated directly with symptom or disease treatment and network activation. Although numerous biomarkers are under consideration for a variety of stimulation indications the feasibility of these approaches has yet to be fully determined. Particularly, there are critical questions whether the use of adaptive systems can improve efficacy over continuous stimulation, facilitate adjustment of stimulation interventions and improve our understanding of the role of abnormal network function in disease mechanisms.
topic deep brain stimulation
epilepsy
Parkinson's disease
responsive brain stimulation
beta hypersynchrony
phase amplitude coupling
url http://journal.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fnins.2017.00564/full
work_keys_str_mv AT kimberlybhoang biomarkersandstimulationalgorithmsforadaptivebrainstimulation
AT isaacrcassar biomarkersandstimulationalgorithmsforadaptivebrainstimulation
AT warrenmgrill biomarkersandstimulationalgorithmsforadaptivebrainstimulation
AT warrenmgrill biomarkersandstimulationalgorithmsforadaptivebrainstimulation
AT warrenmgrill biomarkersandstimulationalgorithmsforadaptivebrainstimulation
AT dennisaturner biomarkersandstimulationalgorithmsforadaptivebrainstimulation
AT dennisaturner biomarkersandstimulationalgorithmsforadaptivebrainstimulation
_version_ 1725687518613995520