Socio-Ecological Predictors of Frequent Bike Share Trips: Do Purposes Matter?

Using bike share could increase physical activity and improve health. This study used the social-ecological model to identify predictors of frequent bike share trips for different purposes. Participants residing in the U.S. were recruited via Amazon Mechanical Turk (MTurk). Self-report trip purposes...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Li-Ting Chen, Ya-Wen Hsu
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2020-10-01
Series:International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/20/7640
id doaj-6a7fb67a468046ebb4e4ca7588ca720d
record_format Article
spelling doaj-6a7fb67a468046ebb4e4ca7588ca720d2020-11-25T04:05:28ZengMDPI AGInternational Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health1661-78271660-46012020-10-01177640764010.3390/ijerph17207640Socio-Ecological Predictors of Frequent Bike Share Trips: Do Purposes Matter?Li-Ting Chen0Ya-Wen Hsu1Counseling and Educational Psychology, College of Education, University of Nevada, Reno, NV 89557, USADepartment of Hospital and Health Care Administration, Chia Nan University of Pharmacy and Science, Tainan 71710, TaiwanUsing bike share could increase physical activity and improve health. This study used the social-ecological model to identify predictors of frequent bike share trips for different purposes. Participants residing in the U.S. were recruited via Amazon Mechanical Turk (MTurk). Self-report trip purposes were used to group participants into using bike share for commuting only (<i>n</i> = 260), social/entertainment only (<i>n</i> = 313), exercise only (<i>n</i> = 358), dual or triple-purpose (<i>n</i> = 501), and purposes other than commuting, social/entertainment, and exercise (<i>n</i> = 279). Results showed that at the intrapersonal level, perceived use of bike share to be helpful for increasing physical activity was a significant predictor for all groups, except for the other purpose group. Adjusting outdoor activity based on air quality was a significant predictor for the dual or triple-purpose group. At the interpersonal level, having four or more friends/family using bike share was a significant predictor for the other purpose group. At the community level, distance to the nearest bike share within acceptable range was a significant predictor for social/entertainment and dual or triple-purpose groups. The findings suggest that it is important to consider factors at multiple levels for predicting bike share usage. Moreover, health educators and policy makers should adopt different strategies for promoting bike share usage based on trip purposes.https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/20/7640bikesharingtrip purposecyclingactive transportationcommunity healthphysical activity
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Li-Ting Chen
Ya-Wen Hsu
spellingShingle Li-Ting Chen
Ya-Wen Hsu
Socio-Ecological Predictors of Frequent Bike Share Trips: Do Purposes Matter?
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
bikesharing
trip purpose
cycling
active transportation
community health
physical activity
author_facet Li-Ting Chen
Ya-Wen Hsu
author_sort Li-Ting Chen
title Socio-Ecological Predictors of Frequent Bike Share Trips: Do Purposes Matter?
title_short Socio-Ecological Predictors of Frequent Bike Share Trips: Do Purposes Matter?
title_full Socio-Ecological Predictors of Frequent Bike Share Trips: Do Purposes Matter?
title_fullStr Socio-Ecological Predictors of Frequent Bike Share Trips: Do Purposes Matter?
title_full_unstemmed Socio-Ecological Predictors of Frequent Bike Share Trips: Do Purposes Matter?
title_sort socio-ecological predictors of frequent bike share trips: do purposes matter?
publisher MDPI AG
series International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
issn 1661-7827
1660-4601
publishDate 2020-10-01
description Using bike share could increase physical activity and improve health. This study used the social-ecological model to identify predictors of frequent bike share trips for different purposes. Participants residing in the U.S. were recruited via Amazon Mechanical Turk (MTurk). Self-report trip purposes were used to group participants into using bike share for commuting only (<i>n</i> = 260), social/entertainment only (<i>n</i> = 313), exercise only (<i>n</i> = 358), dual or triple-purpose (<i>n</i> = 501), and purposes other than commuting, social/entertainment, and exercise (<i>n</i> = 279). Results showed that at the intrapersonal level, perceived use of bike share to be helpful for increasing physical activity was a significant predictor for all groups, except for the other purpose group. Adjusting outdoor activity based on air quality was a significant predictor for the dual or triple-purpose group. At the interpersonal level, having four or more friends/family using bike share was a significant predictor for the other purpose group. At the community level, distance to the nearest bike share within acceptable range was a significant predictor for social/entertainment and dual or triple-purpose groups. The findings suggest that it is important to consider factors at multiple levels for predicting bike share usage. Moreover, health educators and policy makers should adopt different strategies for promoting bike share usage based on trip purposes.
topic bikesharing
trip purpose
cycling
active transportation
community health
physical activity
url https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/20/7640
work_keys_str_mv AT litingchen socioecologicalpredictorsoffrequentbikesharetripsdopurposesmatter
AT yawenhsu socioecologicalpredictorsoffrequentbikesharetripsdopurposesmatter
_version_ 1724433808830234624