Evaluation of papilla levels following three different techniques for the second stage of implants – A clinical and radiographic study

Objective: Papilla formation after placement of an implant is influenced by the underlying bone and the periodontal biotype. The second-stage surgery to uncover the implants may have an effect on the regeneration of papilla and various techniques such as the scalpel, diode laser, and punch technique...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: L N. V. Alekhya Kamakshi, Ashita S Uppoor, Dilip G Nayak, Swati Pralhad
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications 2021-01-01
Series:Journal of Indian Society of Periodontology
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.jisponline.com/article.asp?issn=0972-124X;year=2021;volume=25;issue=2;spage=120;epage=127;aulast=Kamakshi
id doaj-6a7c63aa7ae5400da9ecbcb3e7e704da
record_format Article
spelling doaj-6a7c63aa7ae5400da9ecbcb3e7e704da2021-03-31T07:05:27ZengWolters Kluwer Medknow PublicationsJournal of Indian Society of Periodontology0972-124X2021-01-0125212012710.4103/jisp.jisp_60_20Evaluation of papilla levels following three different techniques for the second stage of implants – A clinical and radiographic studyL N. V. Alekhya KamakshiAshita S UppoorDilip G NayakSwati PralhadObjective: Papilla formation after placement of an implant is influenced by the underlying bone and the periodontal biotype. The second-stage surgery to uncover the implants may have an effect on the regeneration of papilla and various techniques such as the scalpel, diode laser, and punch technique are used. In the present study, an attempt has been made to evaluate papillary fill levels following three different techniques of second-stage implant surgery. Materials and Methods: A total of 35 patients with 45 implants (39 single implants and 3 sites with two adjacent implants) were randomly divided into three groups with 15 implants each: second-stage implant surgery with midcrestal incision using scalpel (Group I), with I-shaped incision using scalpel (Group II), and using diode laser (Group III). The mean papillary fill and mean crestal bone loss for all three groups were compared at baseline, 3 months, and 6 months of prosthesis delivery. Results: Complete papilla fill at 6 months was seen in 60% and 73.3% of sites in Group II and Group III, respectively. Bone level contacting implant and adjacent teeth was less in both Groups II and III. Bone level from the contact point to the bone crest was least in Groups II and III. Conclusion: The use of diode laser during second-stage surgery showed maximum papillary fill and minimal crestal bone loss when compared with other two techniques. Irrespective of technique used for second-stage surgery, bone loss did occur after prosthesis delivery.http://www.jisponline.com/article.asp?issn=0972-124X;year=2021;volume=25;issue=2;spage=120;epage=127;aulast=Kamakshibone lossdental implantslasersoft tissue
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author L N. V. Alekhya Kamakshi
Ashita S Uppoor
Dilip G Nayak
Swati Pralhad
spellingShingle L N. V. Alekhya Kamakshi
Ashita S Uppoor
Dilip G Nayak
Swati Pralhad
Evaluation of papilla levels following three different techniques for the second stage of implants – A clinical and radiographic study
Journal of Indian Society of Periodontology
bone loss
dental implants
laser
soft tissue
author_facet L N. V. Alekhya Kamakshi
Ashita S Uppoor
Dilip G Nayak
Swati Pralhad
author_sort L N. V. Alekhya Kamakshi
title Evaluation of papilla levels following three different techniques for the second stage of implants – A clinical and radiographic study
title_short Evaluation of papilla levels following three different techniques for the second stage of implants – A clinical and radiographic study
title_full Evaluation of papilla levels following three different techniques for the second stage of implants – A clinical and radiographic study
title_fullStr Evaluation of papilla levels following three different techniques for the second stage of implants – A clinical and radiographic study
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of papilla levels following three different techniques for the second stage of implants – A clinical and radiographic study
title_sort evaluation of papilla levels following three different techniques for the second stage of implants – a clinical and radiographic study
publisher Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
series Journal of Indian Society of Periodontology
issn 0972-124X
publishDate 2021-01-01
description Objective: Papilla formation after placement of an implant is influenced by the underlying bone and the periodontal biotype. The second-stage surgery to uncover the implants may have an effect on the regeneration of papilla and various techniques such as the scalpel, diode laser, and punch technique are used. In the present study, an attempt has been made to evaluate papillary fill levels following three different techniques of second-stage implant surgery. Materials and Methods: A total of 35 patients with 45 implants (39 single implants and 3 sites with two adjacent implants) were randomly divided into three groups with 15 implants each: second-stage implant surgery with midcrestal incision using scalpel (Group I), with I-shaped incision using scalpel (Group II), and using diode laser (Group III). The mean papillary fill and mean crestal bone loss for all three groups were compared at baseline, 3 months, and 6 months of prosthesis delivery. Results: Complete papilla fill at 6 months was seen in 60% and 73.3% of sites in Group II and Group III, respectively. Bone level contacting implant and adjacent teeth was less in both Groups II and III. Bone level from the contact point to the bone crest was least in Groups II and III. Conclusion: The use of diode laser during second-stage surgery showed maximum papillary fill and minimal crestal bone loss when compared with other two techniques. Irrespective of technique used for second-stage surgery, bone loss did occur after prosthesis delivery.
topic bone loss
dental implants
laser
soft tissue
url http://www.jisponline.com/article.asp?issn=0972-124X;year=2021;volume=25;issue=2;spage=120;epage=127;aulast=Kamakshi
work_keys_str_mv AT lnvalekhyakamakshi evaluationofpapillalevelsfollowingthreedifferenttechniquesforthesecondstageofimplantsaclinicalandradiographicstudy
AT ashitasuppoor evaluationofpapillalevelsfollowingthreedifferenttechniquesforthesecondstageofimplantsaclinicalandradiographicstudy
AT dilipgnayak evaluationofpapillalevelsfollowingthreedifferenttechniquesforthesecondstageofimplantsaclinicalandradiographicstudy
AT swatipralhad evaluationofpapillalevelsfollowingthreedifferenttechniquesforthesecondstageofimplantsaclinicalandradiographicstudy
_version_ 1724178022904365056