Parental informal payments in Kyrgyzstani schools: Analyzing the strongest and the weakest link

This paper aims to explain why parental informal payments emerge and then spread in different manners in Kyrgyzstani schools and to examine their interaction as informal institutions with the school as a formal one. It is argued that the main reason behind informal payments is the survival of the sc...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Rubén Ruiz Ramas
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SAGE Publishing 2016-07-01
Series:Journal of Eurasian Studies
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1879366516300094
id doaj-6a6fb2ab9bba477a801fb569d7d8dd87
record_format Article
spelling doaj-6a6fb2ab9bba477a801fb569d7d8dd872020-11-25T03:49:53ZengSAGE PublishingJournal of Eurasian Studies1879-36652016-07-017220521910.1016/j.euras.2015.06.003Parental informal payments in Kyrgyzstani schools: Analyzing the strongest and the weakest linkRubén Ruiz RamasThis paper aims to explain why parental informal payments emerge and then spread in different manners in Kyrgyzstani schools and to examine their interaction as informal institutions with the school as a formal one. It is argued that the main reason behind informal payments is the survival of the schools; parents' acceptance of them was a result of necessity. In a small percentage of experiences where marketization of public schools was successful, there was a socioeconomic segregation of pupils, advancing toward a de facto privatization of public schools. Then, while the key logic behind informal payments was the upgrading or elitization of schools, the nature of the engagement of givers and receivers was by choice rather than by necessity. Finally, following Helmke and Levitsky (2004), I link the survival strategy to a substitutive relationship to formal public school outcomes, and to the elitization strategy, a competing nature with the formal logic of Kyrgyzstani basic education. Special attention is given to the social function approach toward informal economy practices, and to the significance of social stratification on how those informal practices work. The paper focuses on the comparison of informal payments in two schools representing the two strategies previously described: an elitnaya school from the center of Bishkek, the 13th Gymnasium School; and the conventional 21st Middle School in the novostroika (new settlement) of Enesay, the capital's periphery. The fieldwork of this research was developed in two stays during the months of July/August and October/November in 2011.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1879366516300094informal economyinformal paymentspost-socialismeducationKyrgyzstan
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Rubén Ruiz Ramas
spellingShingle Rubén Ruiz Ramas
Parental informal payments in Kyrgyzstani schools: Analyzing the strongest and the weakest link
Journal of Eurasian Studies
informal economy
informal payments
post-socialism
education
Kyrgyzstan
author_facet Rubén Ruiz Ramas
author_sort Rubén Ruiz Ramas
title Parental informal payments in Kyrgyzstani schools: Analyzing the strongest and the weakest link
title_short Parental informal payments in Kyrgyzstani schools: Analyzing the strongest and the weakest link
title_full Parental informal payments in Kyrgyzstani schools: Analyzing the strongest and the weakest link
title_fullStr Parental informal payments in Kyrgyzstani schools: Analyzing the strongest and the weakest link
title_full_unstemmed Parental informal payments in Kyrgyzstani schools: Analyzing the strongest and the weakest link
title_sort parental informal payments in kyrgyzstani schools: analyzing the strongest and the weakest link
publisher SAGE Publishing
series Journal of Eurasian Studies
issn 1879-3665
publishDate 2016-07-01
description This paper aims to explain why parental informal payments emerge and then spread in different manners in Kyrgyzstani schools and to examine their interaction as informal institutions with the school as a formal one. It is argued that the main reason behind informal payments is the survival of the schools; parents' acceptance of them was a result of necessity. In a small percentage of experiences where marketization of public schools was successful, there was a socioeconomic segregation of pupils, advancing toward a de facto privatization of public schools. Then, while the key logic behind informal payments was the upgrading or elitization of schools, the nature of the engagement of givers and receivers was by choice rather than by necessity. Finally, following Helmke and Levitsky (2004), I link the survival strategy to a substitutive relationship to formal public school outcomes, and to the elitization strategy, a competing nature with the formal logic of Kyrgyzstani basic education. Special attention is given to the social function approach toward informal economy practices, and to the significance of social stratification on how those informal practices work. The paper focuses on the comparison of informal payments in two schools representing the two strategies previously described: an elitnaya school from the center of Bishkek, the 13th Gymnasium School; and the conventional 21st Middle School in the novostroika (new settlement) of Enesay, the capital's periphery. The fieldwork of this research was developed in two stays during the months of July/August and October/November in 2011.
topic informal economy
informal payments
post-socialism
education
Kyrgyzstan
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1879366516300094
work_keys_str_mv AT rubenruizramas parentalinformalpaymentsinkyrgyzstanischoolsanalyzingthestrongestandtheweakestlink
_version_ 1724493597107027968