Cooperative Type Snowball Throwing and Inquiry: A Comparing the Two Opposite Models in Science Learning

This study aims to investigate which one the most effective model between cooperative learning type snowball throwing and inquiry in science learning achievement. Sample of this study was 31 students of class IVA as experimental class I and 28 students of class IVB as Experiment II in one of element...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Feni Anisa, Zulfa Dewina
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: UHAMKA Press 2017-11-01
Series:Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan Dasar
Online Access:http://jipd.uhamka.ac.id/index.php/jipd/article/view/64
id doaj-6a6e110aa517465b8f99111b12c4776e
record_format Article
spelling doaj-6a6e110aa517465b8f99111b12c4776e2020-11-24T23:45:02ZengUHAMKA PressJurnal Inovasi Pendidikan Dasar2477-38592477-35812017-11-0131233064Cooperative Type Snowball Throwing and Inquiry: A Comparing the Two Opposite Models in Science LearningFeni Anisa0Zulfa Dewina1Sekolah Dasar Negeri BakalanUniversitas Muhammadiyah Prof. DR. HAMKAThis study aims to investigate which one the most effective model between cooperative learning type snowball throwing and inquiry in science learning achievement. Sample of this study was 31 students of class IVA as experimental class I and 28 students of class IVB as Experiment II in one of elementary schools in Jakarta Timur. Research instruments were arranged according to indicators and in consultation with experts, then instruments were tested to students. The validity of the instrument was analyzed using the Biserial Point Correlation formula. While the reliability test used the formula KR-20. Prior to hypothesis testing, there were two prerequisite tests that consist of the normality test and homogeneity test. The normality test used the liliefors test and obtained both classes had the normal distribution. The homogeneity test used the fisher test and obtained both classes had the same variance. Based on the t-test, it can be seen that cooperative learning type snowball throwing was better than inquiry learning to students’ achievement in science learning. The implication of this result will be discussed in this article.http://jipd.uhamka.ac.id/index.php/jipd/article/view/64
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Feni Anisa
Zulfa Dewina
spellingShingle Feni Anisa
Zulfa Dewina
Cooperative Type Snowball Throwing and Inquiry: A Comparing the Two Opposite Models in Science Learning
Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan Dasar
author_facet Feni Anisa
Zulfa Dewina
author_sort Feni Anisa
title Cooperative Type Snowball Throwing and Inquiry: A Comparing the Two Opposite Models in Science Learning
title_short Cooperative Type Snowball Throwing and Inquiry: A Comparing the Two Opposite Models in Science Learning
title_full Cooperative Type Snowball Throwing and Inquiry: A Comparing the Two Opposite Models in Science Learning
title_fullStr Cooperative Type Snowball Throwing and Inquiry: A Comparing the Two Opposite Models in Science Learning
title_full_unstemmed Cooperative Type Snowball Throwing and Inquiry: A Comparing the Two Opposite Models in Science Learning
title_sort cooperative type snowball throwing and inquiry: a comparing the two opposite models in science learning
publisher UHAMKA Press
series Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan Dasar
issn 2477-3859
2477-3581
publishDate 2017-11-01
description This study aims to investigate which one the most effective model between cooperative learning type snowball throwing and inquiry in science learning achievement. Sample of this study was 31 students of class IVA as experimental class I and 28 students of class IVB as Experiment II in one of elementary schools in Jakarta Timur. Research instruments were arranged according to indicators and in consultation with experts, then instruments were tested to students. The validity of the instrument was analyzed using the Biserial Point Correlation formula. While the reliability test used the formula KR-20. Prior to hypothesis testing, there were two prerequisite tests that consist of the normality test and homogeneity test. The normality test used the liliefors test and obtained both classes had the normal distribution. The homogeneity test used the fisher test and obtained both classes had the same variance. Based on the t-test, it can be seen that cooperative learning type snowball throwing was better than inquiry learning to students’ achievement in science learning. The implication of this result will be discussed in this article.
url http://jipd.uhamka.ac.id/index.php/jipd/article/view/64
work_keys_str_mv AT fenianisa cooperativetypesnowballthrowingandinquiryacomparingthetwooppositemodelsinsciencelearning
AT zulfadewina cooperativetypesnowballthrowingandinquiryacomparingthetwooppositemodelsinsciencelearning
_version_ 1725497573878267904