Glyph guessing for ‘oo’ and ‘ee’: spatial frequency information in sound symbolic matching for ancient and unfamiliar scripts

In three experiments, we asked whether diverse scripts contain interpretable information about the speech sounds they represent. When presented with a pair of unfamiliar letters, adult readers correctly guess which is /i/ (the ‘ee’ sound in ‘feet’), and which is /u/ (the ‘oo’ sound in ‘shoe’) at rat...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Nora Turoman, Suzy J. Styles
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: The Royal Society 2017-01-01
Series:Royal Society Open Science
Subjects:
Online Access:https://royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/pdf/10.1098/rsos.170882
id doaj-6a69c4ba10bf42aaa58813cf6b183f98
record_format Article
spelling doaj-6a69c4ba10bf42aaa58813cf6b183f982020-11-25T04:05:19ZengThe Royal SocietyRoyal Society Open Science2054-57032017-01-014910.1098/rsos.170882170882Glyph guessing for ‘oo’ and ‘ee’: spatial frequency information in sound symbolic matching for ancient and unfamiliar scriptsNora TuromanSuzy J. StylesIn three experiments, we asked whether diverse scripts contain interpretable information about the speech sounds they represent. When presented with a pair of unfamiliar letters, adult readers correctly guess which is /i/ (the ‘ee’ sound in ‘feet’), and which is /u/ (the ‘oo’ sound in ‘shoe’) at rates higher than expected by chance, as shown in a large sample of Singaporean university students (Experiment 1) and replicated in a larger sample of international Internet users (Experiment 2). To uncover what properties of the letters contribute to different scripts' ‘guessability,’ we analysed the visual spatial frequencies in each letter (Experiment 3). We predicted that the lower spectral frequencies in the formants of the vowel /u/ would pattern with lower spatial frequencies in the corresponding letters. Instead, we found that across all spatial frequencies, the letter with more black/white cycles (i.e. more ink) was more likely to be guessed as /u/, and the larger the difference between the glyphs in a pair, the higher the script's guessability. We propose that diverse groups of humans across historical time and geographical space tend to employ similar iconic strategies for representing speech in visual form, and provide norms for letter pairs from 56 diverse scripts.https://royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/pdf/10.1098/rsos.170882sound symbolismcross-modal correspondenceswriting systemsevolution of languagevisual spatial frequency
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Nora Turoman
Suzy J. Styles
spellingShingle Nora Turoman
Suzy J. Styles
Glyph guessing for ‘oo’ and ‘ee’: spatial frequency information in sound symbolic matching for ancient and unfamiliar scripts
Royal Society Open Science
sound symbolism
cross-modal correspondences
writing systems
evolution of language
visual spatial frequency
author_facet Nora Turoman
Suzy J. Styles
author_sort Nora Turoman
title Glyph guessing for ‘oo’ and ‘ee’: spatial frequency information in sound symbolic matching for ancient and unfamiliar scripts
title_short Glyph guessing for ‘oo’ and ‘ee’: spatial frequency information in sound symbolic matching for ancient and unfamiliar scripts
title_full Glyph guessing for ‘oo’ and ‘ee’: spatial frequency information in sound symbolic matching for ancient and unfamiliar scripts
title_fullStr Glyph guessing for ‘oo’ and ‘ee’: spatial frequency information in sound symbolic matching for ancient and unfamiliar scripts
title_full_unstemmed Glyph guessing for ‘oo’ and ‘ee’: spatial frequency information in sound symbolic matching for ancient and unfamiliar scripts
title_sort glyph guessing for ‘oo’ and ‘ee’: spatial frequency information in sound symbolic matching for ancient and unfamiliar scripts
publisher The Royal Society
series Royal Society Open Science
issn 2054-5703
publishDate 2017-01-01
description In three experiments, we asked whether diverse scripts contain interpretable information about the speech sounds they represent. When presented with a pair of unfamiliar letters, adult readers correctly guess which is /i/ (the ‘ee’ sound in ‘feet’), and which is /u/ (the ‘oo’ sound in ‘shoe’) at rates higher than expected by chance, as shown in a large sample of Singaporean university students (Experiment 1) and replicated in a larger sample of international Internet users (Experiment 2). To uncover what properties of the letters contribute to different scripts' ‘guessability,’ we analysed the visual spatial frequencies in each letter (Experiment 3). We predicted that the lower spectral frequencies in the formants of the vowel /u/ would pattern with lower spatial frequencies in the corresponding letters. Instead, we found that across all spatial frequencies, the letter with more black/white cycles (i.e. more ink) was more likely to be guessed as /u/, and the larger the difference between the glyphs in a pair, the higher the script's guessability. We propose that diverse groups of humans across historical time and geographical space tend to employ similar iconic strategies for representing speech in visual form, and provide norms for letter pairs from 56 diverse scripts.
topic sound symbolism
cross-modal correspondences
writing systems
evolution of language
visual spatial frequency
url https://royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/pdf/10.1098/rsos.170882
work_keys_str_mv AT noraturoman glyphguessingforooandeespatialfrequencyinformationinsoundsymbolicmatchingforancientandunfamiliarscripts
AT suzyjstyles glyphguessingforooandeespatialfrequencyinformationinsoundsymbolicmatchingforancientandunfamiliarscripts
_version_ 1724434657568620544