Gaps in evidence for the use of medically authorized cannabis: Ontario and Alberta, Canada

Abstract Background With legal access to medical cannabis in Canada since 2001, there is a need to fully characterize its use at both the individual and population levels. We draw on data from Canada’s largest cohort study of medical cannabis to identify the primary reasons for medical cannabis auth...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Cerina Lee, Jessica M. Round, Scott Klarenbach, John G. Hanlon, Elaine Hyshka, Jason R. B. Dyck, Dean T. Eurich
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2021-06-01
Series:Harm Reduction Journal
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s12954-021-00509-0
id doaj-6a6755aa9894436fa7677a1f822a1c88
record_format Article
spelling doaj-6a6755aa9894436fa7677a1f822a1c882021-06-13T11:06:29ZengBMCHarm Reduction Journal1477-75172021-06-011811910.1186/s12954-021-00509-0Gaps in evidence for the use of medically authorized cannabis: Ontario and Alberta, CanadaCerina Lee0Jessica M. Round1Scott Klarenbach2John G. Hanlon3Elaine Hyshka4Jason R. B. Dyck5Dean T. Eurich6School of Public Health, University of AlbertaSchool of Public Health, University of AlbertaDivision of Nephrology, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, University of AlbertaSt. Michael’s Hospital Department of Anesthesia, University of TorontoSchool of Public Health, University of AlbertaCardiovascular Research Centre, Department of Pediatrics, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, University of AlbertaSchool of Public Health, University of AlbertaAbstract Background With legal access to medical cannabis in Canada since 2001, there is a need to fully characterize its use at both the individual and population levels. We draw on data from Canada’s largest cohort study of medical cannabis to identify the primary reasons for medical cannabis authorization in Canada from 2014 to 2019 in two major provinces: Alberta (AB) and Ontario (ON), and review the extent that evidence supports each indication. Methods Self-reported baseline assessments were collected from adult patients in ON (n = 61,835) and AB (n = 3410) who were authorized medical cannabis. At baseline, sociodemographic, primary medical information, and validated clinical questionnaires were completed by patients as part of an individual assessment. Patients’ reasons for seeking medical cannabis were compared to published reviews and guidelines to assess the level of evidence supporting medical cannabis use for each condition. Results Medical cannabis use in both AB and ON was similar in both demographic and reason for authorization. The most common reasons for medical cannabis authorization were: (1) pain (AB = 77%, ON = 76%) primarily due to chronic musculoskeletal, arthritic, and neuropathic pain, (2) mental health concerns (AB = 32.9%, ON = 38.7%) due to anxiety and depression, and (3) sleep problems (AB = 28%, ON = 25%). More than 50 other conditions were identified as reasons for obtaining authorization. Conclusion In both AB and ON, the majority of reasons for medical cannabis authorization are not substantiated by clinical evidence to fully support its efficacy for long-term use. Ongoing epidemiological studies on medical cannabis on these treatments are warranted to fully outline its treatment benefits or risks.https://doi.org/10.1186/s12954-021-00509-0Medical cannabisEpidemiologyCohort studyChronic painAnxietyDepression
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Cerina Lee
Jessica M. Round
Scott Klarenbach
John G. Hanlon
Elaine Hyshka
Jason R. B. Dyck
Dean T. Eurich
spellingShingle Cerina Lee
Jessica M. Round
Scott Klarenbach
John G. Hanlon
Elaine Hyshka
Jason R. B. Dyck
Dean T. Eurich
Gaps in evidence for the use of medically authorized cannabis: Ontario and Alberta, Canada
Harm Reduction Journal
Medical cannabis
Epidemiology
Cohort study
Chronic pain
Anxiety
Depression
author_facet Cerina Lee
Jessica M. Round
Scott Klarenbach
John G. Hanlon
Elaine Hyshka
Jason R. B. Dyck
Dean T. Eurich
author_sort Cerina Lee
title Gaps in evidence for the use of medically authorized cannabis: Ontario and Alberta, Canada
title_short Gaps in evidence for the use of medically authorized cannabis: Ontario and Alberta, Canada
title_full Gaps in evidence for the use of medically authorized cannabis: Ontario and Alberta, Canada
title_fullStr Gaps in evidence for the use of medically authorized cannabis: Ontario and Alberta, Canada
title_full_unstemmed Gaps in evidence for the use of medically authorized cannabis: Ontario and Alberta, Canada
title_sort gaps in evidence for the use of medically authorized cannabis: ontario and alberta, canada
publisher BMC
series Harm Reduction Journal
issn 1477-7517
publishDate 2021-06-01
description Abstract Background With legal access to medical cannabis in Canada since 2001, there is a need to fully characterize its use at both the individual and population levels. We draw on data from Canada’s largest cohort study of medical cannabis to identify the primary reasons for medical cannabis authorization in Canada from 2014 to 2019 in two major provinces: Alberta (AB) and Ontario (ON), and review the extent that evidence supports each indication. Methods Self-reported baseline assessments were collected from adult patients in ON (n = 61,835) and AB (n = 3410) who were authorized medical cannabis. At baseline, sociodemographic, primary medical information, and validated clinical questionnaires were completed by patients as part of an individual assessment. Patients’ reasons for seeking medical cannabis were compared to published reviews and guidelines to assess the level of evidence supporting medical cannabis use for each condition. Results Medical cannabis use in both AB and ON was similar in both demographic and reason for authorization. The most common reasons for medical cannabis authorization were: (1) pain (AB = 77%, ON = 76%) primarily due to chronic musculoskeletal, arthritic, and neuropathic pain, (2) mental health concerns (AB = 32.9%, ON = 38.7%) due to anxiety and depression, and (3) sleep problems (AB = 28%, ON = 25%). More than 50 other conditions were identified as reasons for obtaining authorization. Conclusion In both AB and ON, the majority of reasons for medical cannabis authorization are not substantiated by clinical evidence to fully support its efficacy for long-term use. Ongoing epidemiological studies on medical cannabis on these treatments are warranted to fully outline its treatment benefits or risks.
topic Medical cannabis
Epidemiology
Cohort study
Chronic pain
Anxiety
Depression
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s12954-021-00509-0
work_keys_str_mv AT cerinalee gapsinevidencefortheuseofmedicallyauthorizedcannabisontarioandalbertacanada
AT jessicamround gapsinevidencefortheuseofmedicallyauthorizedcannabisontarioandalbertacanada
AT scottklarenbach gapsinevidencefortheuseofmedicallyauthorizedcannabisontarioandalbertacanada
AT johnghanlon gapsinevidencefortheuseofmedicallyauthorizedcannabisontarioandalbertacanada
AT elainehyshka gapsinevidencefortheuseofmedicallyauthorizedcannabisontarioandalbertacanada
AT jasonrbdyck gapsinevidencefortheuseofmedicallyauthorizedcannabisontarioandalbertacanada
AT deanteurich gapsinevidencefortheuseofmedicallyauthorizedcannabisontarioandalbertacanada
_version_ 1721380149404893184