Gaps in evidence for the use of medically authorized cannabis: Ontario and Alberta, Canada
Abstract Background With legal access to medical cannabis in Canada since 2001, there is a need to fully characterize its use at both the individual and population levels. We draw on data from Canada’s largest cohort study of medical cannabis to identify the primary reasons for medical cannabis auth...
Main Authors: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
BMC
2021-06-01
|
Series: | Harm Reduction Journal |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1186/s12954-021-00509-0 |
id |
doaj-6a6755aa9894436fa7677a1f822a1c88 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-6a6755aa9894436fa7677a1f822a1c882021-06-13T11:06:29ZengBMCHarm Reduction Journal1477-75172021-06-011811910.1186/s12954-021-00509-0Gaps in evidence for the use of medically authorized cannabis: Ontario and Alberta, CanadaCerina Lee0Jessica M. Round1Scott Klarenbach2John G. Hanlon3Elaine Hyshka4Jason R. B. Dyck5Dean T. Eurich6School of Public Health, University of AlbertaSchool of Public Health, University of AlbertaDivision of Nephrology, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, University of AlbertaSt. Michael’s Hospital Department of Anesthesia, University of TorontoSchool of Public Health, University of AlbertaCardiovascular Research Centre, Department of Pediatrics, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, University of AlbertaSchool of Public Health, University of AlbertaAbstract Background With legal access to medical cannabis in Canada since 2001, there is a need to fully characterize its use at both the individual and population levels. We draw on data from Canada’s largest cohort study of medical cannabis to identify the primary reasons for medical cannabis authorization in Canada from 2014 to 2019 in two major provinces: Alberta (AB) and Ontario (ON), and review the extent that evidence supports each indication. Methods Self-reported baseline assessments were collected from adult patients in ON (n = 61,835) and AB (n = 3410) who were authorized medical cannabis. At baseline, sociodemographic, primary medical information, and validated clinical questionnaires were completed by patients as part of an individual assessment. Patients’ reasons for seeking medical cannabis were compared to published reviews and guidelines to assess the level of evidence supporting medical cannabis use for each condition. Results Medical cannabis use in both AB and ON was similar in both demographic and reason for authorization. The most common reasons for medical cannabis authorization were: (1) pain (AB = 77%, ON = 76%) primarily due to chronic musculoskeletal, arthritic, and neuropathic pain, (2) mental health concerns (AB = 32.9%, ON = 38.7%) due to anxiety and depression, and (3) sleep problems (AB = 28%, ON = 25%). More than 50 other conditions were identified as reasons for obtaining authorization. Conclusion In both AB and ON, the majority of reasons for medical cannabis authorization are not substantiated by clinical evidence to fully support its efficacy for long-term use. Ongoing epidemiological studies on medical cannabis on these treatments are warranted to fully outline its treatment benefits or risks.https://doi.org/10.1186/s12954-021-00509-0Medical cannabisEpidemiologyCohort studyChronic painAnxietyDepression |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Cerina Lee Jessica M. Round Scott Klarenbach John G. Hanlon Elaine Hyshka Jason R. B. Dyck Dean T. Eurich |
spellingShingle |
Cerina Lee Jessica M. Round Scott Klarenbach John G. Hanlon Elaine Hyshka Jason R. B. Dyck Dean T. Eurich Gaps in evidence for the use of medically authorized cannabis: Ontario and Alberta, Canada Harm Reduction Journal Medical cannabis Epidemiology Cohort study Chronic pain Anxiety Depression |
author_facet |
Cerina Lee Jessica M. Round Scott Klarenbach John G. Hanlon Elaine Hyshka Jason R. B. Dyck Dean T. Eurich |
author_sort |
Cerina Lee |
title |
Gaps in evidence for the use of medically authorized cannabis: Ontario and Alberta, Canada |
title_short |
Gaps in evidence for the use of medically authorized cannabis: Ontario and Alberta, Canada |
title_full |
Gaps in evidence for the use of medically authorized cannabis: Ontario and Alberta, Canada |
title_fullStr |
Gaps in evidence for the use of medically authorized cannabis: Ontario and Alberta, Canada |
title_full_unstemmed |
Gaps in evidence for the use of medically authorized cannabis: Ontario and Alberta, Canada |
title_sort |
gaps in evidence for the use of medically authorized cannabis: ontario and alberta, canada |
publisher |
BMC |
series |
Harm Reduction Journal |
issn |
1477-7517 |
publishDate |
2021-06-01 |
description |
Abstract Background With legal access to medical cannabis in Canada since 2001, there is a need to fully characterize its use at both the individual and population levels. We draw on data from Canada’s largest cohort study of medical cannabis to identify the primary reasons for medical cannabis authorization in Canada from 2014 to 2019 in two major provinces: Alberta (AB) and Ontario (ON), and review the extent that evidence supports each indication. Methods Self-reported baseline assessments were collected from adult patients in ON (n = 61,835) and AB (n = 3410) who were authorized medical cannabis. At baseline, sociodemographic, primary medical information, and validated clinical questionnaires were completed by patients as part of an individual assessment. Patients’ reasons for seeking medical cannabis were compared to published reviews and guidelines to assess the level of evidence supporting medical cannabis use for each condition. Results Medical cannabis use in both AB and ON was similar in both demographic and reason for authorization. The most common reasons for medical cannabis authorization were: (1) pain (AB = 77%, ON = 76%) primarily due to chronic musculoskeletal, arthritic, and neuropathic pain, (2) mental health concerns (AB = 32.9%, ON = 38.7%) due to anxiety and depression, and (3) sleep problems (AB = 28%, ON = 25%). More than 50 other conditions were identified as reasons for obtaining authorization. Conclusion In both AB and ON, the majority of reasons for medical cannabis authorization are not substantiated by clinical evidence to fully support its efficacy for long-term use. Ongoing epidemiological studies on medical cannabis on these treatments are warranted to fully outline its treatment benefits or risks. |
topic |
Medical cannabis Epidemiology Cohort study Chronic pain Anxiety Depression |
url |
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12954-021-00509-0 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT cerinalee gapsinevidencefortheuseofmedicallyauthorizedcannabisontarioandalbertacanada AT jessicamround gapsinevidencefortheuseofmedicallyauthorizedcannabisontarioandalbertacanada AT scottklarenbach gapsinevidencefortheuseofmedicallyauthorizedcannabisontarioandalbertacanada AT johnghanlon gapsinevidencefortheuseofmedicallyauthorizedcannabisontarioandalbertacanada AT elainehyshka gapsinevidencefortheuseofmedicallyauthorizedcannabisontarioandalbertacanada AT jasonrbdyck gapsinevidencefortheuseofmedicallyauthorizedcannabisontarioandalbertacanada AT deanteurich gapsinevidencefortheuseofmedicallyauthorizedcannabisontarioandalbertacanada |
_version_ |
1721380149404893184 |