How evolution learns to generalise: Using the principles of learning theory to understand the evolution of developmental organisation.

One of the most intriguing questions in evolution is how organisms exhibit suitable phenotypic variation to rapidly adapt in novel selective environments. Such variability is crucial for evolvability, but poorly understood. In particular, how can natural selection favour developmental organisations...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Kostas Kouvaris, Jeff Clune, Loizos Kounios, Markus Brede, Richard A Watson
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2017-04-01
Series:PLoS Computational Biology
Online Access:http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC5383015?pdf=render
id doaj-6a2c253c19524ef686e25ee78ee4f15f
record_format Article
spelling doaj-6a2c253c19524ef686e25ee78ee4f15f2020-11-25T01:44:11ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS Computational Biology1553-734X1553-73582017-04-01134e100535810.1371/journal.pcbi.1005358How evolution learns to generalise: Using the principles of learning theory to understand the evolution of developmental organisation.Kostas KouvarisJeff CluneLoizos KouniosMarkus BredeRichard A WatsonOne of the most intriguing questions in evolution is how organisms exhibit suitable phenotypic variation to rapidly adapt in novel selective environments. Such variability is crucial for evolvability, but poorly understood. In particular, how can natural selection favour developmental organisations that facilitate adaptive evolution in previously unseen environments? Such a capacity suggests foresight that is incompatible with the short-sighted concept of natural selection. A potential resolution is provided by the idea that evolution may discover and exploit information not only about the particular phenotypes selected in the past, but their underlying structural regularities: new phenotypes, with the same underlying regularities, but novel particulars, may then be useful in new environments. If true, we still need to understand the conditions in which natural selection will discover such deep regularities rather than exploiting 'quick fixes' (i.e., fixes that provide adaptive phenotypes in the short term, but limit future evolvability). Here we argue that the ability of evolution to discover such regularities is formally analogous to learning principles, familiar in humans and machines, that enable generalisation from past experience. Conversely, natural selection that fails to enhance evolvability is directly analogous to the learning problem of over-fitting and the subsequent failure to generalise. We support the conclusion that evolving systems and learning systems are different instantiations of the same algorithmic principles by showing that existing results from the learning domain can be transferred to the evolution domain. Specifically, we show that conditions that alleviate over-fitting in learning systems successfully predict which biological conditions (e.g., environmental variation, regularity, noise or a pressure for developmental simplicity) enhance evolvability. This equivalence provides access to a well-developed theoretical framework from learning theory that enables a characterisation of the general conditions for the evolution of evolvability.http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC5383015?pdf=render
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Kostas Kouvaris
Jeff Clune
Loizos Kounios
Markus Brede
Richard A Watson
spellingShingle Kostas Kouvaris
Jeff Clune
Loizos Kounios
Markus Brede
Richard A Watson
How evolution learns to generalise: Using the principles of learning theory to understand the evolution of developmental organisation.
PLoS Computational Biology
author_facet Kostas Kouvaris
Jeff Clune
Loizos Kounios
Markus Brede
Richard A Watson
author_sort Kostas Kouvaris
title How evolution learns to generalise: Using the principles of learning theory to understand the evolution of developmental organisation.
title_short How evolution learns to generalise: Using the principles of learning theory to understand the evolution of developmental organisation.
title_full How evolution learns to generalise: Using the principles of learning theory to understand the evolution of developmental organisation.
title_fullStr How evolution learns to generalise: Using the principles of learning theory to understand the evolution of developmental organisation.
title_full_unstemmed How evolution learns to generalise: Using the principles of learning theory to understand the evolution of developmental organisation.
title_sort how evolution learns to generalise: using the principles of learning theory to understand the evolution of developmental organisation.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
series PLoS Computational Biology
issn 1553-734X
1553-7358
publishDate 2017-04-01
description One of the most intriguing questions in evolution is how organisms exhibit suitable phenotypic variation to rapidly adapt in novel selective environments. Such variability is crucial for evolvability, but poorly understood. In particular, how can natural selection favour developmental organisations that facilitate adaptive evolution in previously unseen environments? Such a capacity suggests foresight that is incompatible with the short-sighted concept of natural selection. A potential resolution is provided by the idea that evolution may discover and exploit information not only about the particular phenotypes selected in the past, but their underlying structural regularities: new phenotypes, with the same underlying regularities, but novel particulars, may then be useful in new environments. If true, we still need to understand the conditions in which natural selection will discover such deep regularities rather than exploiting 'quick fixes' (i.e., fixes that provide adaptive phenotypes in the short term, but limit future evolvability). Here we argue that the ability of evolution to discover such regularities is formally analogous to learning principles, familiar in humans and machines, that enable generalisation from past experience. Conversely, natural selection that fails to enhance evolvability is directly analogous to the learning problem of over-fitting and the subsequent failure to generalise. We support the conclusion that evolving systems and learning systems are different instantiations of the same algorithmic principles by showing that existing results from the learning domain can be transferred to the evolution domain. Specifically, we show that conditions that alleviate over-fitting in learning systems successfully predict which biological conditions (e.g., environmental variation, regularity, noise or a pressure for developmental simplicity) enhance evolvability. This equivalence provides access to a well-developed theoretical framework from learning theory that enables a characterisation of the general conditions for the evolution of evolvability.
url http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC5383015?pdf=render
work_keys_str_mv AT kostaskouvaris howevolutionlearnstogeneraliseusingtheprinciplesoflearningtheorytounderstandtheevolutionofdevelopmentalorganisation
AT jeffclune howevolutionlearnstogeneraliseusingtheprinciplesoflearningtheorytounderstandtheevolutionofdevelopmentalorganisation
AT loizoskounios howevolutionlearnstogeneraliseusingtheprinciplesoflearningtheorytounderstandtheevolutionofdevelopmentalorganisation
AT markusbrede howevolutionlearnstogeneraliseusingtheprinciplesoflearningtheorytounderstandtheevolutionofdevelopmentalorganisation
AT richardawatson howevolutionlearnstogeneraliseusingtheprinciplesoflearningtheorytounderstandtheevolutionofdevelopmentalorganisation
_version_ 1725029376117964800