Adherence to tobramycin inhaled powder vs inhaled solution in patients with cystic fibrosis: analysis of US insurance claims data

Kamal Hamed,1 Valentino Conti,2 Hengfeng Tian,1 Emil Loefroth3 1Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation, East Hanover, NJ, USA; 2Novartis Global Service Center, Dublin, Ireland; 3Novartis Sverige AB, Täby, Sweden Purpose: Tobramycin inhalation powder (TIP), the first dry-powder inhaled antib...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Hamed K, Conti V, Tian H, Loefroth E
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Dove Medical Press 2017-04-01
Series:Patient Preference and Adherence
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.dovepress.com/adherence-to-tobramycin-inhaled-powder-vs-inhaled-solution-in-patients-peer-reviewed-article-PPA
id doaj-6a28e6d5ee514051af2cc7b5dea140e3
record_format Article
spelling doaj-6a28e6d5ee514051af2cc7b5dea140e32020-11-25T01:11:18ZengDove Medical PressPatient Preference and Adherence1177-889X2017-04-01Volume 1183183832584Adherence to tobramycin inhaled powder vs inhaled solution in patients with cystic fibrosis: analysis of US insurance claims dataHamed KConti VTian HLoefroth EKamal Hamed,1 Valentino Conti,2 Hengfeng Tian,1 Emil Loefroth3 1Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation, East Hanover, NJ, USA; 2Novartis Global Service Center, Dublin, Ireland; 3Novartis Sverige AB, Täby, Sweden Purpose: Tobramycin inhalation powder (TIP), the first dry-powder inhaled antibiotic for pulmonary Pseudomonas aeruginosa infection, is associated with reduced treatment burden, increased patient satisfaction, and higher self-reported adherence for cystic fibrosis (CF) patients. We compared adherence in CF patients newly treated with TIP with those newly treated with the traditional tobramycin inhalation solution (TIS), using US insurance claims data.Patients and methods: From the Truven MarketScan® database, we identified CF patients chronically infected with P. aeruginosa who had been prescribed TIP between May 1, 2013 to December 31, 2014, or TIS between September 1, 2010 to April 30, 2012 with at least 12 months of continuous medical and pharmacy benefits prior to and following prescription. TIP and TIS adherence levels were assessed.Results: A total of 145 eligible patients were identified for the TIP cohort and 306 for the TIS cohort. Significant differences in age distribution (25.0 vs 21.9 years for TIP vs TIS, respectively, P=0.017), type of health plan (P=0.014), employment status (72.4% vs 63.4% of TIP vs TIS patients in full-time employment, P=0.008), and some comorbidities were observed between the two cohorts. Although a univariate analysis found no significant differences between TIP and TIS (odds ratio [OR] 1.411, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.949–2.098), TIP was moderately associated with higher adherence levels compared with TIS in a multivariable analysis, once various demographic and clinical characteristics were adjusted for. These included geographic location (OR: 1.566, CI: 1.016–2.413) and certain comorbidities.Conclusion: This study of US patient data supports previous findings that TIP is associated with better adherence compared with TIS; however, further studies will be required to fully elucidate differences in adherence between TIP and TIS. Keywords: Adherence, convenience, inhaler, nebulizer, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, real-world evidence, tobramycin, treatment burden https://www.dovepress.com/adherence-to-tobramycin-inhaled-powder-vs-inhaled-solution-in-patients-peer-reviewed-article-PPAAdherenceconveniencedry powder inhalersPseudomonas aeruginosareal-world evidencetreatment burden
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Hamed K
Conti V
Tian H
Loefroth E
spellingShingle Hamed K
Conti V
Tian H
Loefroth E
Adherence to tobramycin inhaled powder vs inhaled solution in patients with cystic fibrosis: analysis of US insurance claims data
Patient Preference and Adherence
Adherence
convenience
dry powder inhalers
Pseudomonas aeruginosa
real-world evidence
treatment burden
author_facet Hamed K
Conti V
Tian H
Loefroth E
author_sort Hamed K
title Adherence to tobramycin inhaled powder vs inhaled solution in patients with cystic fibrosis: analysis of US insurance claims data
title_short Adherence to tobramycin inhaled powder vs inhaled solution in patients with cystic fibrosis: analysis of US insurance claims data
title_full Adherence to tobramycin inhaled powder vs inhaled solution in patients with cystic fibrosis: analysis of US insurance claims data
title_fullStr Adherence to tobramycin inhaled powder vs inhaled solution in patients with cystic fibrosis: analysis of US insurance claims data
title_full_unstemmed Adherence to tobramycin inhaled powder vs inhaled solution in patients with cystic fibrosis: analysis of US insurance claims data
title_sort adherence to tobramycin inhaled powder vs inhaled solution in patients with cystic fibrosis: analysis of us insurance claims data
publisher Dove Medical Press
series Patient Preference and Adherence
issn 1177-889X
publishDate 2017-04-01
description Kamal Hamed,1 Valentino Conti,2 Hengfeng Tian,1 Emil Loefroth3 1Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation, East Hanover, NJ, USA; 2Novartis Global Service Center, Dublin, Ireland; 3Novartis Sverige AB, Täby, Sweden Purpose: Tobramycin inhalation powder (TIP), the first dry-powder inhaled antibiotic for pulmonary Pseudomonas aeruginosa infection, is associated with reduced treatment burden, increased patient satisfaction, and higher self-reported adherence for cystic fibrosis (CF) patients. We compared adherence in CF patients newly treated with TIP with those newly treated with the traditional tobramycin inhalation solution (TIS), using US insurance claims data.Patients and methods: From the Truven MarketScan® database, we identified CF patients chronically infected with P. aeruginosa who had been prescribed TIP between May 1, 2013 to December 31, 2014, or TIS between September 1, 2010 to April 30, 2012 with at least 12 months of continuous medical and pharmacy benefits prior to and following prescription. TIP and TIS adherence levels were assessed.Results: A total of 145 eligible patients were identified for the TIP cohort and 306 for the TIS cohort. Significant differences in age distribution (25.0 vs 21.9 years for TIP vs TIS, respectively, P=0.017), type of health plan (P=0.014), employment status (72.4% vs 63.4% of TIP vs TIS patients in full-time employment, P=0.008), and some comorbidities were observed between the two cohorts. Although a univariate analysis found no significant differences between TIP and TIS (odds ratio [OR] 1.411, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.949–2.098), TIP was moderately associated with higher adherence levels compared with TIS in a multivariable analysis, once various demographic and clinical characteristics were adjusted for. These included geographic location (OR: 1.566, CI: 1.016–2.413) and certain comorbidities.Conclusion: This study of US patient data supports previous findings that TIP is associated with better adherence compared with TIS; however, further studies will be required to fully elucidate differences in adherence between TIP and TIS. Keywords: Adherence, convenience, inhaler, nebulizer, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, real-world evidence, tobramycin, treatment burden 
topic Adherence
convenience
dry powder inhalers
Pseudomonas aeruginosa
real-world evidence
treatment burden
url https://www.dovepress.com/adherence-to-tobramycin-inhaled-powder-vs-inhaled-solution-in-patients-peer-reviewed-article-PPA
work_keys_str_mv AT hamedk adherencetotobramycininhaledpowdervsinhaledsolutioninpatientswithcysticfibrosisanalysisofusinsuranceclaimsdata
AT contiv adherencetotobramycininhaledpowdervsinhaledsolutioninpatientswithcysticfibrosisanalysisofusinsuranceclaimsdata
AT tianh adherencetotobramycininhaledpowdervsinhaledsolutioninpatientswithcysticfibrosisanalysisofusinsuranceclaimsdata
AT loefrothe adherencetotobramycininhaledpowdervsinhaledsolutioninpatientswithcysticfibrosisanalysisofusinsuranceclaimsdata
_version_ 1725171754118152192