A Comparative Study of 10th Grade Turkish Cypriot Students’ Writing Errors

The present study aims to shed light on analyzing the types and the frequency of the written sentence errors committed by 58 tenth grade Turkish Cypriot English as a foreign language (EFL) students in two classrooms, that is, Class A and B at a public vocational high school in North Cyprus. A quasi-...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Yildiz Terzioğlu, Hanife Bensen Bostanci
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SAGE Publishing 2020-03-01
Series:SAGE Open
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244020914541
id doaj-6a283c394eb746ceae9eb418fa73022d
record_format Article
spelling doaj-6a283c394eb746ceae9eb418fa73022d2020-11-25T03:26:26ZengSAGE PublishingSAGE Open2158-24402020-03-011010.1177/2158244020914541A Comparative Study of 10th Grade Turkish Cypriot Students’ Writing ErrorsYildiz Terzioğlu0Hanife Bensen Bostanci1Haspolat Vocational High School, Mersin, TurkeyNear East University, Mersin, TurkeyThe present study aims to shed light on analyzing the types and the frequency of the written sentence errors committed by 58 tenth grade Turkish Cypriot English as a foreign language (EFL) students in two classrooms, that is, Class A and B at a public vocational high school in North Cyprus. A quasi-experimental design was employed in the study where Class A was the experimental group which was exposed to an audio-visual aid titled “the Little Red Riding Hood” and Class B who acted as the control group. Data were collected from the written sentences produced by the students. All the errors committed by the students were identified and categorized into syntactic, morphological, orthographic, and lexical categories. The results of the study showed that both classes of students committed 11 types of common errors: (a) wrong use of articles, (b) wrong use of prepositions, (c) word order, (d) verb tense, (e) omission of plural –s, (f) misuse of the possessive –s, (g) incorrect use of comparative adjectives, (h) incorrect spelling, (i) punctuation, (j) capitalization, and (k) wrong words. However, the experimental group committed less errors ( N = 232, 57.14%) as compared to the control group ( N = 320, 78.82%). The findings have implications for EFL teachers to incorporate audio-visual aids into their teaching methodologies when teaching the writing skill.https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244020914541
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Yildiz Terzioğlu
Hanife Bensen Bostanci
spellingShingle Yildiz Terzioğlu
Hanife Bensen Bostanci
A Comparative Study of 10th Grade Turkish Cypriot Students’ Writing Errors
SAGE Open
author_facet Yildiz Terzioğlu
Hanife Bensen Bostanci
author_sort Yildiz Terzioğlu
title A Comparative Study of 10th Grade Turkish Cypriot Students’ Writing Errors
title_short A Comparative Study of 10th Grade Turkish Cypriot Students’ Writing Errors
title_full A Comparative Study of 10th Grade Turkish Cypriot Students’ Writing Errors
title_fullStr A Comparative Study of 10th Grade Turkish Cypriot Students’ Writing Errors
title_full_unstemmed A Comparative Study of 10th Grade Turkish Cypriot Students’ Writing Errors
title_sort comparative study of 10th grade turkish cypriot students’ writing errors
publisher SAGE Publishing
series SAGE Open
issn 2158-2440
publishDate 2020-03-01
description The present study aims to shed light on analyzing the types and the frequency of the written sentence errors committed by 58 tenth grade Turkish Cypriot English as a foreign language (EFL) students in two classrooms, that is, Class A and B at a public vocational high school in North Cyprus. A quasi-experimental design was employed in the study where Class A was the experimental group which was exposed to an audio-visual aid titled “the Little Red Riding Hood” and Class B who acted as the control group. Data were collected from the written sentences produced by the students. All the errors committed by the students were identified and categorized into syntactic, morphological, orthographic, and lexical categories. The results of the study showed that both classes of students committed 11 types of common errors: (a) wrong use of articles, (b) wrong use of prepositions, (c) word order, (d) verb tense, (e) omission of plural –s, (f) misuse of the possessive –s, (g) incorrect use of comparative adjectives, (h) incorrect spelling, (i) punctuation, (j) capitalization, and (k) wrong words. However, the experimental group committed less errors ( N = 232, 57.14%) as compared to the control group ( N = 320, 78.82%). The findings have implications for EFL teachers to incorporate audio-visual aids into their teaching methodologies when teaching the writing skill.
url https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244020914541
work_keys_str_mv AT yildizterzioglu acomparativestudyof10thgradeturkishcypriotstudentswritingerrors
AT hanifebensenbostanci acomparativestudyof10thgradeturkishcypriotstudentswritingerrors
AT yildizterzioglu comparativestudyof10thgradeturkishcypriotstudentswritingerrors
AT hanifebensenbostanci comparativestudyof10thgradeturkishcypriotstudentswritingerrors
_version_ 1724592810071425024